Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colombia: Evidence suggests Chavez gave FARC $300M

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:12 PM
Original message
Colombia: Evidence suggests Chavez gave FARC $300M
Source: CNN

(CNN) -- Evidence found in computers seized in a raid over the weekend suggests that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez recently gave the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia $300 million, Colombia's national police chief said Monday.


Ecuadoran soldiers board a helicopter Monday to Angostura, near the Colombian border.

1 of 3 Speaking at a news conference, Gen. Oscar Naranjo also said evidence in the computers suggests FARC had given Chavez 100 million pesos when he was a jailed rebel leader.

FARC has fought to overthrow the Colombian government for 40 years.

Chavez had no immediate response to the allegations involving him.

Naranjo said other evidence in the computers suggests FARC purchased 50 kilograms of uranium this month.

Meanwhile, Colombia said Monday it won't send troops to its southwest and northeast borders, where Venezuelan and Ecuadoran military forces were to be separately deployed after a Colombian raid into Ecuador


Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/03/ecuador.colombia/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. surrrrre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Let's take a vote to Authorize War on Venezuela.
Hillary, what's your vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. lol....ouch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Countdown....
To the U.S. is providing false intelligence excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
113. US INTEL is PRIVATIZED...and full of lies, 'PICK & CHOOSE' intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Way to post a hit piece!
And, yes, the Chavez government has responded.

"Venezuelan Vice President Ramon Carrizalez dismissed the charges, saying: "We are accustomed to the lies of the Colombian government."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080303/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/venezuela_colombia_19

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. warmongering is such an art form
as Bush said, "gotta catapult the propaganda!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The thing is, if you follow the coverage for a while, you can see it coming.
Complaining about RCTV while neglecting their crucial role in the coup, conflating pro- Chavez marchers with "student protestors" before the referendum, saying the Chavez government has nothing to say.

It's a pattern of misrepresentation and obfuscation. We either become good readers or we catapult the propaganda ourselves. :shrug:

In this instance, Colombia is the entity that is guilty of supporting terrorist activity against Venezuela and the entity responsible for murdering people instead of resorting to the law. So, how surprising is it that Colombia is accusing Venezuela and Ecuador of the same?

Not at all. Our tax dollars at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I Know.... I Know
I just don't give posters the benefit of the doubt as you do. They know full well what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And you'd expect the Venezuelan government to say anything else???
"Yes, we've been providing money to FARC."

You have no way of knowing if they are or if they aren't providing aid, neither do I.
At this point it's a he said, he said situation.

As to this story being a hit-piece... That's kind of a reactionary response...

You don't like the story, so therefore it lacks merit and is a hit-piece.

Do you do this with all stories that you don't like???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Tell you what. Despite that this story follows a familiar pattern,
I will retract my statement if you can find an objective report.

You won't.

Reactionary, my granny.

This is the same old, same old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nick303 Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
119. The answer to your question is yes.
Source: Every DU thread on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wouldn't really be very surprising
at all if it turns out to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's not the particulars of the hit piece. As always, it's the spin.
The implication is that Chavez supports terrorists.

And, that is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Chavez is a moron for starters
I see him as one of the three stooges of world politics, Bush and Ahmadinejad being the other two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No he is pretty smart..Check out LC on NYMEX.
Oil is up baby, that is what he sells. The dopeman is jacking up the price of his product. He may shed a tear for a fellow communista but money is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Certainly. That's why he has been so successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
101. BFD - the chimp was elected
twice. Also considered successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #101
104. No, the chimp was never elected once. And he has been a disaster. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #104
105. I'll give you the 2000 election
but I don't feel even if Ohio was a disaster in 04, the chimp won by more than 3 million votes. I know it's hard to believe and it took me a long time to recover, but he did win that election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. There's a crowd of people and a mountain of evidence that
hold the opposite view. If you get a chance, catch "Stealing Democracy" on LinkTv this week. It's on again on Friday, iirc.

Just in New Mexico alone, 21K people weren't allowed to vote for Kerry. Their ballots were "under votes" -- 21K people went to the polls, voted for Democrats but not for Kerry. Right!

Bush "won" the election there by something like 1/4 of that number. What happened in OH happened in lots of places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. And didn't NM have problems with
their primary this year? After 8 years of this shit, you'd think election reform would be on the top 10 of someone's list of problems for this country. You may be right about 2004 but we'll never know - 2000 was clearly a stolen election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Yes, New Mexico had an embarrassingly effed up primary.
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 01:47 PM by sfexpat2000
There are a lot of interesting voting practices in NM including some pretty public vote buying and selling.

Try to catch that documentary if you can. Most of the folks at the heart of the election reform movement are in it. It's a great primer for all the most common ways the Republicans are using to steal our votes.

www.linktv.org is their site and they have a schedule up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. I appreciate the into
and will defintitely look for it. Election reform is one of my pet issues and it makes me insane that nobody is talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INDIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Chavez says they aren't terrorists. So I guess in his little mind, supporting them would be ok.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:55 PM by India3
http://www.france24.com/france24Public/en/news/world/20080111-colombia-venezuela-hostages-chavez-political-FARC-terrorists.php

And what we DO know is that Chavez is close enough to FARC to broker the release of their hostages. So I don't know why you think the possibility of him monetarily supporting the group is "laughable." It would be reasonable to believe, judging by past and recent events, that it's quite possible. Don't you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. They're freedom fighters! What business is it of the US anyway! Hell, when you think of what
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 08:14 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
they're financing - and seem to have been from time immemorial! You fascist-lovers are totally mindless?

Oh my! I've just realised. If it's true, why it would mean Hugo would be trying to destabilise another country's government! Lawksamercy, did you ever hear of such a thang! Why, I do declare, Beulah. Pass me another grape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INDIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Lol!
We here at DU HATE WARMONGERING SABRE RATTLERS! Oh wait, Saint Hugo is doing it? Uhhhhhh.....THIS IS ALL URIBE'S FAULT!!1!11 Chavez is only sabre rattling to protect the people of Venezuala via Ecuador...errr....at leas a mile long sliver of Ecuador.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
110. You're quite right of course. The State Department, CIA and Pentagon
must be horrified if it turns out to be true that ANY country could pull such a dirty trick as to destabilise another country's government. If it' true, that's just plain UN-AMERICAN, Ugo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do you think Venezula/Ecudor and Colombia will get into a war?
Just want to know what you guys think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Colombian Gov't is Dimson's puppet FCOL.
You can no more take this seriously than you can WH or Pentagon *news* out of Iraq or Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. So true!!....What would Bushco do without all those profits from the drug trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. And Bush looks ignorant
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 06:43 PM by Tempest
"This is an odd reaction by Venezuela to Colombia's efforts against the FARC, a terrorist organization that continues to hold Colombians, Americans and others hostage," spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.


What is odd about being pissed over the violation of a neighboring country's sovereignty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. On its head.
The "odd" reaction is Colombia's reaction to the release of hostages by FARC.

A sane government would keep negotiating until they are all free, not go on a shooting spree designed to shut down the exchange. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. And those fiendish Chavez soldiers on the border are unplugging babies' incubators!
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:16 PM by Peace Patriot
Here is all you need to know about this situation (and Colombia's lies)...

"The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants** Like Chávez," by Donald Rumsfeld, 12/1/07
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/30/AR2007113001800.html

Translating Rumsfeld just a bit, he urges...

1. Billions more in military aid to Colombia's fascists (through Bushite fingers)--greatest war profiteer boondoggle outside of Iraq and Israel.

2. "Free trade" (kill all the union leaders you want to) for Occidental Petroleum, Drummond Coal, Chiquita, etc., in Colombia (where they chainsaw union leaders and throw their body parts into mass graves--documented, not fantasy war talk). (You wonder why there is a FARC--that is why. 40+ years of it.)

3. Economic warfare against Venezuela and against the hotbed of leftist democracies in the Andes region (where all the oil is) (i.e., Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina--all strong allies of Venezuela)--such as Exxon Mobil's moves last week to freeze $12 billion in Venezuela's assets, over a dispute about Venezuela's 60% share in its own oil (money going to social programs for the poor)--a deal that Norway's Statoil, France's Total, British BP and even Chevron agreed to. Destabilization, internal disorder.

4. Get rid of Congress and the State Department*, so the U.S. can "act swiftly" in support of "friends and allies" in South America. The Bushites have no "friends and allies" in South America, except for the fascist thugs running Colombia, the corrupt Peru "free traders," and U.S.-funded rightwing political groups and paramilitaries within Venezuela and its closest allies. I.e., "swift" U.S. military intervention in support of Colombian aggression and fascist coups in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and/or Argentina. (My guess--Bolivia will be the first to suffer serious disorder, from the rightwing, Bushite-supported separatists in the rural provinces where the gas and oil reserves are located.)

To sum up: We are looking at Oil War II, orchestrated by Donald Rumsfeld. If you've wondered what he's been doing in his "retirement," since the U.S. military, and China, nixed his plan to nuke Iran--this is what--finding more oil fields to hijack, by force, amidst a shit-storm of lies.)


-----------------------

*(You might think getting rid of Congress and the State Department--which is basically what Rumsfeld urges--is a bit of a Dark Lord fantasy. But the real Democrats in Congress actually DID something right--they blockaded the Colombia "free trade" deal because of the short lifespan of union organizers in Colombia. And the State Dept.? Dunno why he would hate them, except maybe their thrust is more corporate than war profiteer--they don't mind killing lots of people, but, once it's over, they want stability so folks can do bidness--know what I mean?--folks like Chevron and Exxon Mobil. And Rumsfeld, he's a chaos man--more war profiteer than corporatist. Anyway, his line back in December--before the Colombian "free trade "deal" was dead--was economic warfare as the preliminary. That failed. (He wasn't able to get rid of Congress--not yet anyway.) He got Exxon Mobil to fill that void. Now he's ready for war.)

**(Chavez is not a "tyrant." But Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney are.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. OIL up to 103..
that is a valuable dead communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. from that perspective, I'll tell you
Hi oil prices will help to pay for the war in Iraq, don't just speculate that Chavez will benefit from it see the whole picture. The Saudis will have more money to maintain their anti democratic regimens, in Dar fur oil prices will help the genocide to prevail.

Thanks God I do not agree with that point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. And Inflation
may slow down in Venezuela. They supply more oil to us than saudi does.

Chavez is an oil man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. I see that is your point of view but I don't like undemocratic regimes like the Saudis
I do not like to support Kings that's medieval times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Nor do I , Theocrats and communistas
are the price of our dependence on their product. Gold toilets and animal farm are paid for with our money.

I would GLADLY pay $2 more for gas and milk for an energy product that cuts these idiots off at the knees.

Short term pain, long term gain.

Cross party issue should be adopted asap, except they all take money from big oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. To do that the whole system needs an overhaul, also I don't like facist
and big money pulls the strings of everybody in politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. Big question about CNN's article: How do you give someone a lot of money when he's a prisoner?
From CNN's prize winning reporting:
Speaking at a news conference, Gen. Oscar Naranjo also said evidence in the computers suggests FARC had given Chavez 100 million pesos when he was a jailed rebel leader.
Would this mean someone brought it to him in a bag as a visitor, and it allowed him a lot of "walking around money," which enabled him to buy many toothbrushes, cigarettes, candy bars? Now you're talking. He must have really lived it up.

I have a feeling Colombian forces brought with them their own bogus "guerrilla laptops" and claimed top guerrilla secrets were exposed. These same laptops allegedly had the goods on evil deeds by the Ecuadorean President, too! Amazing, isn't it?

I'm still interested in the laptop seized by the Colombian attorney general:


Rodrigo Tovar

~snip~
The para-politics scandal has its roots in allegations made following the March 2006 congressional and municipal elections that paramilitary leaders had worked closely with right-wing pro-Uribe candidates in northern Colombia to ensure their victory at the polls. The scandal escalated dramatically following the seizure of a laptop belonging to AUC commander Rodrigo Tovar, also known as “Jorge 40.” The laptop was not delivered to authorities as part of the demobilization process; it was discovered in the possession of Tovar’s right-hand man when he was arrested in early 2006.

According to Colombia’s attorney general’s office, the laptop contained evidence that unemployed peasants in northern Colombia were paid to impersonate paramilitary fighters and to participate in the demobilization process while real paramilitaries continued committing crimes. These crimes, according to information on the laptop, included the killing of 558 individuals in just one region of northern Colombia during the cease-fire. The laptop also contained evidence of paramilitary links to local and national politicians as well as to state security forces. It is the information found on Tovar’s laptop that spawned the para-politics investigation, not confessions or evidence obtained under the Justice and Peace Law.

Despite the evolving rift between the Uribe administration and the paramilitary leaders caused by the para-politics scandal, Mancuso continued to play by the original script when he was called to testify under the Justice and Peace Law in early 2007. The AUC leader only revealed paramilitary collusion with dead or imprisoned politicians and military officers, thereby protecting active representatives of the state. The testimony of other paramilitary leaders primarily focused on revealing the whereabouts of mass graves containing the bodies of the thousands of victims of paramilitary massacres. This strategy was intended to appease human rights and victims rights groups critical of the demobilization processto by creating the illusion that the AUC leaders were confessing all their crimes.

The para-politics scandal, however, continued to evolve. By May 2007, more than 50 national and local elected representatives were under investigation by either Colombia’s attorney general’s office or the Supreme Court for ties to paramilitaries. More than a dozen had been charged with crimes, most of them close political allies of President Uribe. The fact that the para-politics scandal was beginning to tarnish President Uribe’s reputation and undermine the credibility of his administration became apparent when the Colombian leader received a hostile reception on a visit to Washington, DC in early May. Congressional Democrats were outspokenly critical of the Colombian leader and his country’s political and human rights crisis.
(snip)
http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia258.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I bet those laptops can tell us where Osama is and what happened
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:27 PM by sfexpat2000
to Baby Jane! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Maybe they can tell us how so many trolls are jamming up D.U.! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. And al about Eyeran's nooks, to!!11!!
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. I'm hoping they'll reveal whatever happened to Judge Crater!
JUDGE CRATER -- VANISHED!
What Happened to the "Missingest Man in
New York"?





http://www.prairieghosts.com/crater.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. LC is up, So Chavez is happy.
It would be hard to believe that two groups that have been killing each other for many years do not get money from friendly sources. Do you think Hugo, the man in red, does not fund the FARC? I mean I have an opinion, but no one has fact. At least that they are releasing yet.

Just like Saudi funnels money to the Fatah government quietly, I would bet the leftists funnel money to fight the evil us empire. Easily done by funding farc. Obviously we funnel money to columbia.

Communists tend to die in Latin America, it is not uncommon. A full fledged war over communists is not uncommon.

Lets see what Hugo does next. May be more difficult than giving orders to a few thousand guys for show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
60. thank you for a voice of reason on this thread
I am amazed at the political naivete expressed by many here. The number of people who judge geopolitical situations in stark black-and-white based on who is 'bush's poodle' is quite frightening. Perhaps they might consider seeing how former hostages of FARC feel about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #60
77. surely they feel like The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo
The mothers who's sons and daughters look like communist thats why they were thrown in to the ocean.
I don't think the latest killing of the guerrillero would bring any hope for those families of the hostages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #77
81. Indeed, War is Hell. There is no answer to your comment
which will change the heartbreak felt for innocent victims, of which the hostages are only a small part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. sadly in this board some function like cheer leaders of violence
none of those cheer leaders have been in a situation like many people in latin america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. Are you referring to me? (I don't think so but not sure)
I am sitting ~150 miles from FARC, which has a presence in Darien.

Thankfully the worst of the problems that plague colombia have not reached here yet, though some have....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. no not you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #60
86. The former hostages want PEACE. They are joining a march for PEACE. They
had just called upon Uribe to start PEACE TALKS and to cooperate with Chavez on more hostage releases. They have been unanimous and quite vocal about this. All four of the former legislators who were recently released just held a press conference about this--just before the deliberate murder by Colombia of the CHIEF HOSTAGE NEGOTIATOR, Paul Reyes, in the massacre on the Colombian-Ecuador border.

You ask, "Perhaps they might consider seeing how former hostages of FARC feel about this?". Read the following and you can answer your own question. How do they feel? They must feel like all their suffering was FOR NOTHING--because Colombia just killed any hope for peace and doesn't give a crap about them, or any of the hostages. They didn't want Paul Reyes DEAD. They wanted more hostage negotiations and peace talks to find a political solution!

------------


Chavez, freed FARC hostages call for political solution to Colombian conflict
February 29th 2008, by Kiraz Janicke - Venezuelanalysis.com
Luis Eladio Pérez and Gloria Polanco speaking at the press conference in Caracas (Reuters)

Caracas, March 1, 2008 (venezuelanalysis.com) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has called for international mediation group to negotiate a humanitarian accord in neighboring Colombia, after a successful Venezuelan led humanitarian mission secured the release of four former legislators held by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), on Wednesday.

During a telephone call to state owned VTV Thursday, Chavez indicated that France, Ecuador, Brazil and Argentina as well as the Organization of American States support such a move. It is "essential" that Venezuela is part of any international mediation group, because "the FARC have demonstrated that they don't believe in anyone else," he added.

In a communiqué, released minutes after the hostage handover the FARC said this would be the last unilateral hostage release. The FARC reiterated their longstanding call for a military free zone as a precondition for any further negotiations for a humanitarian exchange of 40 remaining high profile hostages for 500 imprisoned guerrillas. However, the Colombian government immediately rejected this proposal.

Chavez said the desire for peace by the majority of Colombians and that the pressure of world opinion would force Uribe to change his position.

"President Uribe is going to have to change his position. Everybody is in agreement except for Uribe, " he declared.

Speaking at a press conference in Caracas on Thursday night, the former Colombian legislators, Luis Eladio Pérez, Jorge Gechem, Orlando Beltrán and Gloria Polanco, also spoke out in favor of a military free zone to facilitate a humanitarian exchange.

"I publicly challenge President Alvaro Uribe to demonstrate the success of his policy of democratic security and clear the military from the municipalities of Pradera and Florida and after 45 days the Armed Forces can recuperate this territory," Perez said after his liberation. "The solution is political, Mr. President Uribe," he repeated twice during the press conference.

"If you persist in the foolishness of insisting on a military rescue you are going to receive, Mr President Uribe, 40 or 50 corpses. It is absurd to think of a military rescue with the conditions that we had in captivity. There would be a massacre," Pérez stressed.


He revealed that the four recently liberated ex legislators have a proposal to present "to President Uribe, the President (of France Nicholas) Sarkozy and, of course, to President (of Venezuela, Hugo) Chavez." This proposal would only be made public after the three heads of state had been informed, he said.

Pérez who classified the FARC as a "political military group who use terrorist practices" also referred to former Colombian presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt, captured by the guerrillas in 2001, who he said is in a "very bad state of health."

In a message released in 2003 demonstrating Betancourt's proof of life, the former presidential candidate indicated that she was opposed any form of military rescue, as she feared a repeat of the tragedy that occurred in May that year when ex governor of Antioquia, Gilberto Echeverri, and the del ex Defense Minister, Guillermo Gaviria, died during a botched military rescue ordered by Uribe.

Betancourt maintains this position Perez said, however she is also conscious "of the high risk and lack of commitment of the President of the Republic."

In contrast Betancourt calls for a political solution to the conflict based on the Geneva Convention and believes that "fundamentally President Uribe has to recognize the political status of the FARC guerrillas," Perez said.

Pérez also affirmed that after an attempted escape, Betancourt, "remained chained up during the night," and her captors, "humiliated her, obliged her to walk barefoot, tied her to trees and rationed her food."

Ex congressman Orlando Beltrán condemned "all terrorist acts, wherever they come from. I condemn the terrorism of the FARC, of the paramilitaries and the terrorism of the State." He pointed out that Colombia "is the only country in the world that has disappeared an entire political movement, more than six thousand leaders of Unión Patriótica were disappeared, to speak only of this case."

Under a previous peace accord in the 1980's the FARC demobilized and formed Unión Patriótica, however after they laid down their arms thousands of former guerrillas were hunted down by paramilitaries, backed by the Colombian state, and massacred, forcing them back into the armed struggle.


Beltrán added that the Colombian State "has to assume responsibility and understand that they must create the conditions to achieve a humanitarian accord. I don't understand why, when make these handovers in a unilateral manner, they say they are not going to clear the military from a centimeter of the national territory."

Gloria Polanco asserted, "It is necessary to reach the heart of President Uribe, to speak to him, to explain, because he has to understand that if he does not clear the military from Pradera and Florida, which is what the FARC ask, our comrades will die in captivity."

"I am asking for a humanitarian accord, because they have to place value on life, not on a piece of land, not on a piece of territory," she said.

All four ex-legislators confirmed that they would participate in an international day of action organized by human rights organizations on March 6 in protest against paramilitary violence in Colombia. Uribe has condemned the protest scheduled to take place in some 150 cities around the world, claiming it is organized by the FARC.


(emphasis added)
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/3213
(Note: Venezuela Analysis is a Fair Use web site.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #86
93. Uribes actions were a sabotage to peace
anybody who has follow the events knows that all the political movement was to liberate and disarm the FARC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #60
87. Several of them probably feel grateful to Hugo Chavez. n/t
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 08:21 AM by sfexpat2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #60
100. While you're at it...
Why don't you ask the survivors of Colombian military and paramilitary massacres how they feel?

Why don't you ask the family members of all the murdered trade unionists how they feel?

The FARC has no monopoly on political violence in Colombia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #100
112. Agreed, in Colombia there is plenty of blame. I do not feel that this
excuses simply ignoring the role FARC has played in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
63. How freaking idiotic can you possibly be?
"Communists tend to die in Latin America..."

Why don't you do a little research into just WHY and HOW they die? In the first place, "Communist" is an all-inclusive label for anyone who stands in the way of American profits in Latin America.

"Communists die" - men, women and children are killed by US-funded monsters with death squads and American weapons. Brought to us by the same people who send trolls to message boards to post the kind of shit that you just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
97. I thought the FARC was getting rich off coca and cocaine...
...like all the other players in Colombia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. I was wondering that too
they could have a mantion, why they had to sleep in the jungle for so many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
115. You forgot the boiling frogs, Animal Farm, petro state, pimp and
communista (because we all know if you put an "a" at the end of the word it makes it even more sinister. But kudos to you on bringing the red shirt for the millionth time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave From Canada Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
123. I'd also like to thank you for a voice of reason. Hugobots really annoy me sometimes. They must
have a pair of Rummy's rose-coloured glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. how do they power those laptops with dynamos? and what ISP they use?
I mean are they using google maps to move in the jungle?
how do they get their ink for the printer?
did they have access to myspace?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. mine
ran off a diesel generator or a dc inverter. ISP provided by satellite. This was around many years ago, and I am sure is still available.

Might even explain how this communist was found and killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. So maybe the ISP did spy on them for not paying on time
and you know in Colombia you don't have to be communist to be kill, so don't worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. ISP would not need to be helping(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. That's for damned sure. Too much information already out about both the military & the death squads
slaughtering people in villages then dressing them so they LOOK like rebels, for appearances. It has been admitted formally by these fools.

They kill people they may suspect are leftist sympathizers, or for many other reasons, including being union workers, human rights workers, journalists, etc. If they don't like what someone's doing they explain killing him as killing someone who's working for the enemy, as with reporters who do material they don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Seems like they killed
a communist terrorist. A bit to overtly, but a big farc fish is now dead. I wonder if he killed himself by using a sat phone or who sold him out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Uribe's claim to Correa was that the rebels were firing at them and that's why they had to go in
there and wipe them out. Fat chance, since they were all asleep when they were slaughtered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Big guy dead..
"slaughter" is a risk in that business. FARC is not a labor group. They should know the business they are in. Seems they managed to kill a columbian raider, maybe they were sleep walking..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I'll check if those communist terrorist have a myspace website
don't forget they were trying to buy uranium, see Iran and Korea with all their resources couldn't make a nuke out of it, those guys may have some new technology.

On the other hand never go to Colombia, there, if you are a communist the government will kill you, if you look like a communist they'll kill you too, if you question the elites then you look like a communist and you know what happened. if you are a drug addict don't worry narco lords in the government do free home shipping and the last one, you could be kidnap by the FARC.

Colombia is a state with many problems to solve and little has been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
91. You WILL believe in whatever bullshit accusations the Colombians say was in that laptop, won't you?
I advise you to type a feet or so away from the keyboard. Your salivation might short circuit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #36
96. Farc only has Tom as a friend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polticalpout Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. No denial yet from Chavez that he gave the terrorist organization the $
And yea, FARC are terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
90. Ah, yes, of course there was a denial. It's in #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
99. Let's cut out this "terrorist" bullshit, shall we?
The FARC is a guerrilla army that has been around since the 1960s. It is a belligerent actor in a low-level civil war that has been going on ever since then.

The word "terrorist" and all its variants should be scrubbed from the political discourse. It is purely a term of propaganda generally meaning "someone who commits political violence of which we do not approve."

Palestinian bombers = terrorists
Israeli bombers = not

Al Qaeda in Iraq = terrorists
US in Iraq = not

Salvadoran FMLN = terrorists
Nicaraguan Contras = freedom fighters

Taliban = terrorists
Northern Alliance = not

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. Peter and the Wolf springs to mind, but without the wolf turning up.
I think that'll be the lupine Peter, himself, donning his Grandma drag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Evidence"? As in psy-ops and spin
Since when has Uribe actually been consistent with the facts?

This man is part of a narcotrafficker-industrialist clique in Bogotá, Colombia. Check his past record. Uribe had been on the DEA’s "most wanted" list until he was suborned by the CIA in a deal in which he was to be used against all the guerrilla forces in the Americas. He is obeying his masters in Washington very well. He has nothing to fear from FARC because he will get plenty of protection oweing to his steadfast loyalty toward US imperialism.

I think in Latin America there is something called the Treaty of Tlatelolco, which Washington completely ignores. Uribe must know this much. It is the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean. I think that FARC, being itself representative of the aspirations of a great majority of Columbians, and like all other Latin America governments, they do not want this plague to be here. So this accusation of the purchase of the "yellow cake", the uranium isotopes, or whatever they want to call it, this is of course nuclear bomb-making material, but it is an absurdity, a total absurdity to bring up this malicious progaganda against FARC. There are real idiots at work for Uribe these days.

http://www.opanal.org/opanal/Tlatelolco/P-Tlatelolco-i.htm

It is really the US of A which needs to be held accountable for its steadfast refusal to make this hemisphere free of nuclear weapons. What does that have to do with FARC? Nothing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh, man, you GOTTA see BoRev.net about this!
It is hilarious!

www.BoRev.net. Go there now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. ROFL
:rofl:

Oh man this guy knows what he is talking about, he must be a latino.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Omigod!


That is SO good! And so right, too! It takes that special effort to get people to remember to put together the fragments they've already learned, instead of waiting for the corporate media to spin it all for them.

Gotta remember that name: BoRev.net
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. One thing about BoRev.net--funny as it is, you always LEARN something there.
And I just learned this: The person that Uribe's forces were targeting, and killed in his sleep, Raul Reyes, was the CHIEF HOSTAGE NEGOTIATOR. HE was the person that Chavez had talked into releasing the six hostages. They killed him! They goddamned killed the key person in the hostage releases, and no doubt the key person for peace talks.

This means that the hostage negotiations are OVER. Fini. Kaput. No more will be freed. And it means the hopes for peace are dead. It also means that the hostages were nothing more to Uribe and his Bushite masters than pawns in the Oil War game.

Jeez. It's worse than I thought. I thought it was just an opportunistic target. They KNEW who they were going after. They LIED to Rafael Correa (president of Ecuador) that it was a hot pursuit. Reyes and his group were not shooting at anybody. They were hiding out, asleep, in a camp. And somehow the Colombia fascists found out where Reyes was, and went and KILLED HIM and 16 others. Only one Colombian soldier died, and that means it was a slaughter.

Oh, my! I'm beginning to understand why Hugo Chavez was so upset. They killed the guy he was negotiating with!

And, furthermore, the negotiations and the hostages releases were undoubtedly why Reyes and his group--who normally hide deep in the jungle--were more vulnerable to such an attack.

Well, I hope this is the end of Uribe--and of Rumsfeld's and the Bushites' stinking activities. I hope the OAS throws Colombia AND the U.S. out of the organization. Daniel Ortega proposed that, at the meeting of Latin American countries, Spain and Portugal, recently--forming an OAS without the U.S. as a member. (There was a four hour meeting about it--news of which got eclipsed by the tiff between the Chavez and Juan Carlos.) Now, the Bushite puppetmastery in Colombia is plain for all to see. They went and killed the hope for peace in Colombia's civil war. That is unforgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. The guy resumed all that we have been discussing here this morning plus
he used the proper terms 'he invaded Ecuador'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #42
92. BoRev's article, plus this comment of yours, deserve an OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
94. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
117. Now Colombia even says they found Reyes by tracking hostage-release-related traffic:
the old don't even try to release your hostages or we'll hunt you down and kill you routine

Alleged Chávez's call to Reyes revealed location of FARC camp
A phone call Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez allegedly made to rebel leader Raúl Reyes revealed the location of the guerilla leader, according to Colombian intelligence reports radio station Radio Cadena Nacional (RCN) disclosed on Wednesday ...
http://english.eluniversal.com/2008/03/05/en_colcd_art_oas:-ecuador,-colomb_05A1410289.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. I recall that for the last two weeks Colombia was telling the world they knew exactly where the
rebels were keeping the hostages.

Interesting new bit of info. they just floated about how they allegedly located this group inside Ecuador.

Looks as if there's almost nothing we can believe from the Colombian government other than they want more U.S. taxpayers' dollars, and make it snappy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
70. Brilliant!
Calls the BS out for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. see for your self
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Love that quote in the article:
Eduardo Galeano once said, speaking about the global media companies, "Never before have so few fooled so many."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This reminds me I got a book by Eduardo Galeano for Christmas which I've been too busy to read, and I'd better get busy!

Thanks for posting the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. I like an interview were
Galeano says " ..in Venezuela every day in the morning you turn on the TV, the first thing you listen is that in Venezuela there is no freedom of speech, could they say that if there were no freedom of speech?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
64. It is human nature, and I do not understand why people insist on thinking
they can have socialism without the human element in the nature of the government.

"Jesus Christ, is it that hard to take such a great humanitarian concept and NOT F'k it up every time?"

Yes, and those who insist on forcing this concept on the masses time and time again have killed tens of millions directly (consult Joe Stalin, mao tse-tung)

Power corrupts. It is how we are made. To deny it is to repeat the experiments of Imperial Russia --> USSR, China -->PRC, etc., time and time again.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #64
88. Americans are probably the last people who should be lecturing anyone
on failed social experiments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #88
111. Please illuminate us with your wisdom
To which failed experiments do you refer? How do they compare with the Glorious Revolution in China, the Rise of the Soviet Union, and other notable failed social experiments?

Somehow I cannot see how a country where the government isn't killing millions via various direct methods, and where virtually everyone can eat, as a failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. Um, how many people have we killed in Iraq? And everyone can't eat here.
There seem to be some places where light does not penetrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
51. so despite the hysteria here, Colombia simply ignores the military build up near its borders
as well they should.

"Meanwhile, Colombia said Monday it won't send troops to its southwest and northeast borders, where Venezuelan and Ecuadoran military forces were to be separately deployed after a Colombian raid into Ecuador."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080303/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/south_america_saber_rattling

"But otherwise, there was relative calm on the ground. Colombia's defense minister, Juan Manuel Santos, said no extraordinary military moves were planned, and vowed not to be drawn into a conflict with Chavez. "

"I prefer to leave President Chavez out of this discussion," he said. "We're not commenting on what he does, says or suggests."


The rebel presence has made many Venezuelans who live near the border uneasy. Chavez's threats have only made these people more anxious. And war fever seemed absent from the streets of Caracas.

"I hope Chavez isn't thinking about the madness of sending our sons to die in an absurd war with Colombia," said Carmen Arellano, a 41-year-old homemaker. "Chavez wants to fight a war to conceal the social and economic crisis in this country."

Venezuelan political analyst Teodoro Petkoff said he doesn't believe war is imminent, despite Chavez's rhetoric: "For me he's a barking dog that doesn't bite."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. It's going to take a wild for them to invade another country n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. a "wild", no entiendo. seems like Chavez and Correa are well are their way
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. ask Uribe not me
I don't have the answer you want to listen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I don't want the war that you do
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. Thanks but I advocate for peace not for murder
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:31 PM by AlphaCentauri
I don't care who negotiate peace in Colombia, I just want to see peace there. All those advocating murder and violence favoring the invasion of another country are simple wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. Chavez would like nothing more than to be head of state of
Gran Colombia, which is today split into ecuador, colombia, and venezuela.

Mark my words, this man will at some point provoke a regional war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Panama too..
since he thinks he is bolivar he would want panama back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #72
83. (from someone sitting in Panama City)
He knows it would never be allowed. The Canal Treaty remains in force (the neutrality clause), and even Chavez knows better than to mouth off about it. He uses the carrot approach here, but Panama is implicity under the US security blanket, and quietly works with the US on the Darien/Farc problem.

Also, was the isthmus part of Gran Colombia? IIRC it was part of the Estados Unidos Centroamericanos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Military buildup? Hot one! DU'ers are certainly too bright to buy that crap.
Speaking of military build-up along the border, we are well aware that Uribe has mentioned building not one, but THREE MILITARY BASES on the Colombia Venezuela border, once it was understood the Manta Base in Ecuador was going to be closed to the U.S.

Now THAT'S a military build-up.

No fool in his right mind would fault Venezuela and Ecuador in wanting to keep Uribe's forces out of their countries.

It's not as if armed Colombians haven't ALREADY barged in there and set up camp outside Caracas, at the behest of Cuban-Venezuelan asshole, opposition militant activist, Roberto Alonso, where they were captured, and questioned, and jailed. Many of them were allowed to return to Colombia at a later date, an act most Presidents wouldn't consider. Chavez said they hadn't harmed anyone, at that point, and had been following someone else's direction, and turned them loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. straight from the jackasses' mouth. Chavez ordered troops to the border
that's more than enough evidence for you. maybe they'll try keeping the FARC out of their countries now???? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #59
103. Damn Right We ARE
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 12:43 PM by fascisthunter
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. Mr. Arellano should consult DU on why his views are incorrect ntxt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. yep, reading to many press releases won't help n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
80. Perhaps holding out for more military aid
body counts require $ in Latin America, and the history just of what we "know" is nearly beyond belief particularly in Columbia...hopefully things will be different this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
71. The U.S. has no right to complain
not after funding

1. The Contras against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua (who were elected TWICE in elections that international observers agreed were fair)

2. The Mujahadeen in Afghanistan

3. the CIA-backed overthrow of several governments, including those of Iran, Brazil, Guatemala, Panama, Grenada, Haiti, Chile, and some we probably never learned about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. How much money from drug traffic goes to the colombian paramilitaries? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #71
89. East Timor, South Viet Nam. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #71
116. You can add Vietnam, Cyprus, East Timor,....oh never mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codedonkey Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #71
120. I'm doubting this whole thing is ture..
or maybe it is.. I don't know. But let's just assume it is for the sake of argument. While the US government may have no right to complain, that doesn't make it right. Two wrongs don't make a right...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
76. I don't believe it. In all likelihood, this is a load of propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. to change the focus off the real problem n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:59 PM by AlphaCentauri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codedonkey Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #78
121. Brittney Spears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
79. now THAT is some good old fashioned cold war ruuuuskie propaganda!!!
i particularly like the bit about the uranium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #79
95. sounds like a more recently WMDs allegations in the middle east
The Uranium staff must be the most stupid allegation, countries like Iran haven't been able to develop a nuke how come a guerrilla in the jungle would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
98. Trying to overthrow our corrupt Columbian puppet government? Bravo Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave From Canada Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #98
122. It's not his business to overthrow other countries governments. Just as it isn't Bush's either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC