Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: MI Caucus Likely, Says DNC Rules Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:04 PM
Original message
BREAKING: MI Caucus Likely, Says DNC Rules Committee
Source: The Plank

Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:17 PM


A member of the DNC's Rules And Bylaws Committee--the committee that stripped Florida and Michigan of its delegates for moving their primaries before February 5th--told me that Michigan plans to get out of its uncounted delegate problem by announcing a new caucus in the next few days.

"They want to play. They know how to do caucuses," the DNC source said. "That was their plan all along, before they got cute with the primary."

Michigan Democrats had originally planned on caucuses after the legally permissible Feb. 5 date, but then went along with top elected Democrats, including Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who pushed for an early primary.

Hillary Clinton won that Jan. 15 primary, but was the only major candidate on the ballot. Barack Obama and John Edwards had removed their names, although Obama supporters in the state urged voters to choose “uncommitted” over Clinton. Forty percent of the voters that day did just that, compared to 55 percent who voted for




Read more: http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/03/06/breaking-michigan-caucus-likely-says-dnc-rules-committee-member.aspx



Sent to me by a Friend who keeps me well-informed. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick! I wonder how expensive this is to do? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. So 40% voted AGAINST Clinton with nobody else on the ballot?
Bring. It. On.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No. Edwards and Kucinich were still in the race
and some Hillary voters voted uncommitted as well, because there was a theory that if all the delegates were uncommitted, they could later vote at a brokered convention.

But the 40% included plenty of votes that were FOR someone.

I am so tired of the anti-Hillary negativity I'm about ready to leave DU for awhile, and I've been here since almost the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. TaTa!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "Tata"
is quite fitting when referring to HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ah, the usual graciousness of an Obama supporter
Well, what did I expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Google "Clinton+TaTa Consultancy"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Edwards was not on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton and Mike Gravel were the only ones on the ticket in MI
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 07:36 PM by 1776Forever
http://michiganmessenger.com/tag.do;jsessionid=A83272C6041E5D17F1B8DE9B647C520A?tag=Dennis+Kucinich

(if you want to look at the link cut and paste it - it won't copy full link)

Kucinich campaign makes last-minute play for Michigan
by: Eartha Jane Melzer
Monday (01/14) at 11:06 AM

Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton and Mike Gravel are the only still-running Democratic candidates whose names are on the primary ballot here, and Kucinich is the only one to campaign in Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Edwards
was in the race -- but not on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. Later. Can't take the heat...
She deserves the hate, with her lies and attempts to cheat (not to mention her conservatism).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. Edwards was not on the ballot.
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 10:42 AM by MaineDem
Clinton, Dodd, and Kucinich were the only ones on the ballot, IIRC.

It seems I forgot Gravel.

http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/state?state=MI&ref=ipb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. Until then, Buh-bye.
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 12:18 PM by Infinite Hope
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I heart your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Most people didn't bother voting at all, so it's ridiculous to assume that percentage means anything
I'd be perfectly happy if they did a caucus at this point, since a primary is financially impossible in such a money-strapped state. The fairest thing though would be another primary, in which everyone is on the ballot. Then all of Clinton's supporters would vote who didn't vote before. And Obama's supporters can vote again. Win-win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. I'm in MI. I donated to Edwards. I voted "uncommited." I'm part of that 40%.
I wasn't alone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Awesome!
I think BO can take Michigan! Larger African American population than Ohio AND most of Michigan gets CBC so they don't have to rely on the Clinton News Network. The CBC, by the way, is heavily and accurately covering the NAFTA issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. MI also has the Michael Moore contingent.
And we know how he feels about her campaign and voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Right on! I am hopeful that this happens!
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. If this is good with the people of MI then I'm all for it.
They deserve a chance to be counted and if this is what it takes then so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I heard Mark Brewer said no to one.
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. He may be the party chair, but Gov. Granholm's the one in charge.
Brewer talks out of both sides of his mouth, too. Ugh. I can't stand that guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blunorsk Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Michigan Blues
a little known Republican state legislator from a small rural county proposed the change.
I live in MI; what a mess. The Michigan primary and the Florida primary are too flawed to accurately portray the voters' sentiments.
These two states Must be set aside (as Florida should have been set aside from the 2000 election)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton said on the news tonight she would NOT accept a caucus in MI.
No link, I can't even remember which network news was playing, but it was the 6:30 news on abc/cbs/nbc. Had to be one of them, since that's all I get.

She was emphatic.

Wat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. What, she expects to benefit from an unfair election?
Figures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. So what she wants matters more than the people of Michigan???
Hilary, Hilary, Hilary, there you go again. They're so cute at this age. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Apparently, she's adamant about the people having their say
except when doing so might cost her delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. I suspect Hillary won't settle for a caucus -- and I don't blame her.
If it was a primary, it should be another primary. In the primary, with many people voting, she would be up by 15% or so; in caucuses, with many fewer voters, Obama is the king, which is fine -- but how democratic is that? If they had a caucus before, it's one thing, but they had a primary. Fair is fair. Or do not replace it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The Obamists seem to prefer having the fewest possible people vote...wonder why?
Oh wait. Intimidation of polling places is a felony while it's accepted in caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. We had the lowest turnout I've ever seen.
No, we didn't have many people voting in our primary. The caucus is the only fair thing to do, and chances are, we can get the turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Goodness, I hope so.
This is the only right thing to do at this point.

And frankly, I'm mad as hell at our top party leadership here. This whole mess was started by the MIGOP (probably by the RNC and Rove behind the scenes), and our top party leaders were dumb enough to go along. It's time to clean house!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good for Michigan!
Take that talking point away from Hillary! Force her to accept that she can not win.

:patriot:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary: no MI caucus, no Florida primary redo...just seat them.
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Now isn't this just fair.......When Obama wasn't even on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. He was in FL, MI is another mess altogether
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. that is SO wrong. Lots of folks didn't vote because they knew it wouldn't count
AND the votes can't be allowed for Mich as Clinton was on the ballot but Obama had removed his name as the DNC asked....

I support a new vote - be it caucus or primary for both states - but the original votes cannot stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windex Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. that is unbelieveable
Everybody sees what is going on, I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. Not happening, Senator.
How in the world could you even begin to construe that as fair? Obama wasn't even on the MI ballot, for pete's sake! I don't understand her, I really don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azazel Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is election overkill. The US has gotten like some Third World country,
where it's always "election time."

This creates the illusion of democracy.

Well, the illusion is becoming a slow-motion nightmare as these endless primaries go on.

There have been twenty debates featuring Obama and Clinton.

This whole process started too soon and costs too much money.

I understand the wall-to-wall coverage of all-Obama/Hillary-all-the-time on TV and on the internet news sites. It keeps our minds off the war, and the weakening economy.

But if I want to be distracted from these serious issues, I prefer other, more elevating forms of distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. What Azazel said
Great post. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. Damn straight!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tachyon Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. Well that seems completely fair to me...it's a lot better than ignoring Michigan voters
altogether, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
33. Good news!
This seems the best solution, and much better than just validating the results of a third-world style previous vote. Let's see some serious campaigning and a real vote and a real voice in Michigan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
38. If this happens in Michigan, Florida
will look foolish.....again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
40. I think Ohio should have a "DO OVER" also nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. YES!!! I hope they have early this spring...either late March or April.
Easily doable in late March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC