Source:
CNNMoney.comSix months after the first rate cut
Stocks are sharply lower since the Fed began its recent series of rate cuts in September, making this the worst reaction to an easing cycle since the 1950s.
By Alexandra Twin, CNNMoney.com senior writer
March 11, 2008: 3:59 AM EDT
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Despite five interest rate cuts in the past six months, Wall Street has remained impervious to the Federal Reserve's wooing, with investors taking a "thanks, but..." attitude to Ben Bernanke & Co.'s attempt to recharge the economy and stock market.
Since September, the central bank has lowered its federal funds rate, a key overnight bank lending rate, from 5.25 percent to 3 percent. This included a 75 basis point emergency cut in January. There are 100 basis points in one percentage point.
---snip---
Since the first rate cut on Sept. 18 of last year, through Monday's close, the S&P 500 is down 16.2%. That makes this the worst performance for the market following a series of rate cuts since the 1950s, according to Standard & Poor's research. And that's taking into account other times when the economy was in a recession, as may be the case now.
---snip---
Stovall found that the S&P 500 was in positive territory 7 of 11 times, for an average gain of 12.3% overall and a gain of 7.6% since 1980. For the years before 1980, Stovall looked at cuts to the discount rate and for the years after that, he looked at cuts to the federal funds rate.
Read more:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/11/markets/market_ratecuts/index.htm?section=money_topstories
Interesting read. I disagree with some of the conclusions (such as the problem may be that the feds cut rates, too late), but still worth reading to get a sense of what was supposed to happen, versus what has happened. One point -the fed cuts deal with liquidity, while the problems are less liquidity and more solvency (i.e., far more fundamental weakness).