Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court to Review FCC Ban on Profanity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:59 PM
Original message
Supreme Court to Review FCC Ban on Profanity
Source: Washington Post


The Supreme Court today announced it would review the Federal Communications Commission's policy banning even the fleeting use of expletives on the airwaves, the first time in 30 years the court has considered broadcast decency standards.

The FCC in 2004 reversed its previous policy and said even the one-time use of obscenities on broadcast television and radio was a violation of decency standards. The agency reprimanded Fox Broadcasting for separate incidents in 2002 and 2003 when singer Cher and celebrity Nicole Richie, during live award shows, used variations of a vulgar, four-letter word.

The FCC said the rules were necessary to protect the public from declining standards of decency, and said technological advances made it possible for networks to better police what went out over the airwaves.

...

The Bush administration urged the Supreme Court to take the case. The appeals court ruling, Solicitor General Paul D. Clement said, had placed the commission in the "untenable position of having a grant of authority that the public expects it to exercise . . . but that the Second Circuit has indicated cannot be meaningfully exercised'' consistent with the First Amendment.

Washington Post


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/17/AR2008031700842.html



It must require years of practice to simultaneously render the Constitution a 'dead letter' while claiming to uphold the Amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. FI!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Nation of Grumpy Old Men, Not Laws
Cheney doesn't really need Supreme Court dispensation, guys. He's a law unto himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Supreme Court to Review their Right Wing Judicial Activism
such as unconstitutionally appointing a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is crucial, I'm SERIES!!!1!
If only there were fewer 4-letter words on the boob tube, all our problems would be solved.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC