Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New trial for former Qwest CEO Nacchio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:25 PM
Original message
New trial for former Qwest CEO Nacchio
Source: 9NEWS

DENVER (AP) - A federal appellate court has ordered a new trial for former Qwest CEO Joe Nacchio, saying the trial judge incorrectly excluded expert testimony and classified information important to his defense.

At his trial, a jury concluded Nacchio sold $52 million worth of stock when he knew Denver-based Qwest Communications International Inc. was at financial risk but didn't tell investors.

The jury acquitted Nacchio of 23 counts.

Nacchio was sentenced to prison for six years but remained free on bail pending the outcome of his appeal.


Read more: http://www.9news.com/news/top-article.aspx?storyid=88289



Damn! Maybe his lawyers will take all of his money in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's important to remember Qwest told the NSA
to go jump in a lake when they wanted them to cooperate with illegal wiretaps.

I have no idea whether or not Nacchio is guilty of real wrongdoing. I do know that the first trial was full of prosecutorial wrongdoing and that he does deserve a fair trial with all the evidence presented.

If the government wants to convict somebody it doesn't like, it had better play by the rules or the conviction won't stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Man are you ever wrong.
This has nothing to do with wiretapping. This has everything to do with stealing money from shareholders and ruining jobs all while knowing your company is going to tank. Next to Kenneth Lay, Naccio was the biggest Republican supported crook of this decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Then let him be convicted honestly
BTW, you might read my whole post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Qwest
I am no fan,but the fact that he turned down illegal wiretaps and then later is prosecuted is a little too coincidental. Under any other administration I would have said justice has been served. Under this regime however, I question all coincidences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, it's important to look at it. Betrayal and revenge + highest motivators for Dick and George.
1) Two Governors?
2) x # of U.S. Attorneys ?
3) CEO's ?
4) Clarke, two O'Neills, how many more = smeared or more. ?

Just thinking about the VAST number of operatives it takes to plan, coordinate, and act.

We need to know.

Given their record for lying, stealing, destroying, plundering, snearing - we need to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And Nacchio's story is that Qwest lost money because of his refusal to wiretap
He's saying that other federal contracts, upon which Qwest revenue projections were based, were pulled when Qwest refused to go along with Bush's warrantless wiretapping program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Among the big telecommunications companies, only Qwest has refused to help the NSA
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm

Among the big telecommunications companies, only Qwest has refused to help the NSA, the sources said. According to multiple sources, Qwest declined to participate because it was uneasy about the legal implications of handing over customer information to the government without warrants.

Qwest's refusal to participate has left the NSA with a hole in its database. Based in Denver, Qwest provides local phone service to 14 million customers in 14 states in the West and Northwest. But AT&T and Verizon also provide some services — primarily long-distance and wireless — to people who live in Qwest's region. Therefore, they can provide the NSA with at least some access in that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. (Qwest CEO) Nacchio's Convictions Are Overturned
Source: Washington Post


A federal appeals court overturned the 19 insider-trading convictions of former Qwest Communications chief executive Joseph P. Nacchio after concluding that the trial judge improperly excluded expert testimony that would have helped Nacchio advance his defense.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said yesterday that the mistake justified a new trial because a business law professor could have offered important context in Nacchio's bid to persuade jurors that he had an innocent explanation for more than $52 million in stock sales while Qwest was struggling to meet profit targets.

The central issue in the case is whether Nacchio dumped stock in early 2001 because he knew the company was faltering or because he simply sought to diversify his financial holdings.

The three-judge panel's ruling erases the jury verdict from last year, as well as a six-year prison sentence for Nacchio, who had remained free pending the results of his appeal. "Armchair economics is not the way to decide complex securities cases," the appeals court wrote.

Washington Post


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/17/AR2008031702776.html



The best justice money can buy or the finance meltdown makes Qwest CEO dealings seem normal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Edwards was right, there are 2 Americas.
If it walks like a duck, and qu...oh fuck it, we are going the way of Rome...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. This phrase struck me...
"The three-judge panel's ruling erases the jury verdict from last year, as well as a six-year prison sentence for Nacchio, who had remained free pending the results of his appeal". And Mr. Siegelman is in prison pending his why? Mr. Nacchio was targeted for refusing to unconstitutionally invade the rights of we, the people, and tap our phones. Good on him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. K&R for Nacchio standing up for the rule of law
<eom>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. So this guy was free pending the results of his appeal? What
about Siegleman? Why isn't he free? Oh yeah, because he hasn't been able to file an appeal thanks to bush** administration corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Somebody at DoinJ probably got fired for not following the same game plan...
as with Seigelman.

Regardless, it seems even Nancy, Harry, the minions and other enablers can't hold off the shit-storm that's coming. But I am incredibly disappointed that there aren't more whistle-blowers/patriots willing to rat out these criminals. How bad does it have to get before people who are involved and know what's been going on finally realize the actions of this gang are going to negatively impact them, personally, for the rest of their lives along with the rabble?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Maybe whistle-blowers need SOMEBODY to trust?
Did Congress Mistakenly 'Out' Secret Whistle-Blowers?

October 30, 2007

A clerical error by a congressional staffer may have revealed the e-mail addresses of government whistle-blowers.

The addresses were from a list of respondents to a congressional "anonymous" tip line set up to ferret out malfeasance within the Department of Justice.

ABC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I stand corrected. WTF was I thinking? Competence in government? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raincity_calling Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Incompetence?
"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." as stated by Franklin. D. Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. ANd remember, Seigelman was manacled and taken from the courtroom to prison.
White collar executives usually get start dates for the term that are later than the verdic tday. So, hauled off to prison just like a murderer. Also gets beaten in prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Compare Seigelman's treatment to three Execs at Purdue Pharma ...
Purdue pharma admits white lies. Lines up $600 million fine.

IN GUILTY PLEA, OXYCONTIN MAKER TO PAY $600 MILLION

The makers of Oxycontin, a mainstay of cancer patients and fratboys alike, have pled guilty to knowingly promoting the drug as less dangerous and less powerful than it actually is. They argued that since it contained a time release coating, it was safer and less likely for abuse than Vicodin. Obviously nobody did any real research (or any research they did must have been covered up) because people will hork this shit up their noses until their body gets so friggin’ down that their heart is too lazy to breathe. That’s how you die from Oxycontin.


Oxycontin competes with crack cocaine in street sales and causes hundreds of deaths. Yet, after more than ten years of ignoring oxycontin's addictive properties, the execs were fined and walked away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Let's see, he's wealthy and gets his convictions overturned because of a process issue
but the poor guy on death row in Georgia, where most of the witnesses against him recanted, was refused on his appeal.

Justice? Not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Exactly. Many dp inmate's appeals are denied for same reasons. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC