Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama To Army Vet: No Lower Drinking Age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:22 PM
Original message
Obama To Army Vet: No Lower Drinking Age
Source: CBS News/AP

Democrat Barack Obama on Monday promised Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans help with their grievances - save one.

"I know it drives you nuts. But I'm not going to lower the drinking age," the presidential candidate said.

Army veteran Ernest Johnson, 23, of Connecticut, said one of the things that peeved him before he turned 21 was that he couldn't come home and drink a beer - even though he was old enough to serve in the armed services and die for his country.

Obama told Johnson he sympathized, but that setting the legal drinking age at 21 had helped reduce drunken driving incidents and should remain.

The Illinois senator was taping a round-table discussion with eight veterans that is to be broadcast by MTV on the fifth anniversary of the start of the Iraq war.


Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/17/politics/main3946522.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then raise the fighting age to 21. Nobody that young should be in active duty, nt
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:28 PM by onehandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I think that's a good idea....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. I'm all for that. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Great point
18 is much too young an age to decide whether or not you are willing to give your life up for your country. If you are not mature enough to drink a beer, you are not mature enough to pick up a rifle in defense of a nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. Yet you can walk into a voting booth
and vote for the next President of the United States. Do you believe that is to much responsibility for an 18 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. Voting, fighting, drinking--they all should be the same, IMO.
You can't be an adult in one area, and a "child" in others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
42. I wouldn't ask anyone to kill and die for */Cheney...
...especially not without access to alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. I agree, and if one studies brain growth, one is easier "trainable" before age of 21.
.
.
.

The military training is just another form of brainwashing, and having young brains to wash/impress/direct is much easier in teens.

You would see a great difference if the military chose "mature" people to train - at least those of maturing age of 21 and over.

The young interns are trained to "obey", as one teaches a pet; with reward or punishment.

Input from the interns is unwelcome - they must follow the rules from day one.

No input = no progression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Drinking isn't a right
It's a privilege. Voting is a right, and the issue was that people could be drafted to fight in a war started by officials they didn't have the opportunity to vote for or against.

Here's a good link for info about drinking in the US and military drinking laws: http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/InTheNews/UnderageDrinking/1106156025.html

Besides, in America, unlike the rest of the world, the driving age is 16. People cannot master driving and alcohol-related decision making so close together. And it has been proven that a drinking age of 21 lowers alcohol related deaths in the 16-21 age group.

There are many people 18-21 who are in the military because they lack the discipline, skill, drive, money, etc to attend college. What to you suggest these people do with their lives between high school and being 21? The military is a great opportunity for thousands of people. And, just like any other American citizen, they can drink when they go overseas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Nobody under the age of 21 should be in a kill or be killed situation.
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 10:27 PM by onehandle
There should be public service outside of war zones. Seems obvious to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pegleg Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
59. Very wise and sane idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. good for Obama nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If you're old enough to die for this country, you're fucking old enough to have a beer.
You could limit it to people actually in the military, at least.


Either you're an adult or you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or just permit it on bases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Do you want 18 year old getting drunk and driving...but I do think
maybe they should raise the age to 21 before they have to go fight in a war..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I'd have no problem limiting it to bases or raise enlistment age to 21
BTW, how does the military handle it when soldiers are stationed in countries where drinking age is under 21?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. Local law governs in those cases
They may have changed it--and, knowing our suddenly puritanical military, they probably did--but if the drinking age was 18 off post, they set the drinking age to 18 on post. The club system wouldn't have it any other way--if you told all the sub-21 troops "you can drink at the bar right outside the main gate, but you can't drink at the one just inside it," they'd just walk to the bar off post, stumble home, then NEVER set foot in the one on post once they turned 18. And, of course, all the 22-yo soldiers in Bravo Company with 20-yo girlfriends down in Charlie Company would go to the bars off post to be with them.

Differential drinking ages, assuming the military system's age was higher than the local system's, would kill the club system. So they won't do it, or at least SHOULDN'T do it.

Then again...they DID eliminate the dirty magazines from the exchanges on the theory some soldier would bring his kid in the barracks and said kid would see a Dirty Magazine sitting on a soldier's footlocker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. trust me
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 12:08 AM by lwfern
that's not helping the vets deal with their problems; it's just creating new ones for them.

the real problem is that enlistment age is too young.

Actually I think to enlist you should have to be old enough to be elected to congress. (And actually serve in it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Read post #1. Hits it on the head. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Then you bring the troops home, you don't have to lower the drinking age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Drinking is overrated. I honestly don't give a damn about this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
41. "I'm not a woman, so I don't give a damn about abortion or contraception rights."
Same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Not at all the same. Drinking is a luxury. A woman's health is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. The attitude is the same
"I'm not affected by this violation of rights, so I don't care."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. No, you can cut distinctions finer than absurd moral absolutes.
Certain laws matter more than others. Drinking is not a right to health, life, or freedom. Drinking is an absolutely unnecessary luxury and any constraint the government makes on it is fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. "Any constraint the government makes on it is fine with me."
Wow.

Looks like I have made a mistake in post #43, namely "and won't admit it."

You DO admit it.

Wow.

Go to Saudi Arabia. You'll love it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good for him
The right wing is always looking for some angle to rile young people up, even though they've got no intention of doing anything about the issue they blather about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree with Obama. No one driving for less than 5 years should be legally able
to buy alcohol. And that goes for weapons or any other heavy machinery people are exposed to before the age of 21--you need time to become more experienced and understand your physical limitations. If younger people find a way to sneak around it, then that's their problem--but Obama's right. Drunk driving accidents HAVE gone down.

I was IN a drunk driving accident not too long ago (though I wasn't the one driving), and there are few issues I care about as much as this one.

Good for him for not backing down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. As if the laws stop people...
How's the war on drugs going? It's not so much about the beer, but the point. If you're responsible enough to take the lives of others in the name of your country, you damn well should be allowed to enjoy the FULL rights and responsibilities of being an adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. As Judge Judy would say "they are not fully cooked yet"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. "No one driving for less than 5 years should be legally able...
to buy alcohol". Or be given the choice to go and die for his country. Raise the legal enlistment age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. Why not raise the drinking age to 35? or 50? That'll bring accidents down too
The smart thing to do is to teach kids the propriety of drinking in moderation at home, like most cultures do.

But of course, that would be "immoral"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. Why connect driving and alcohol in that way?
What if someone doesn't drive at all? Would you limit their ability to buy alcohol, whatever their age? And why does 5 years of driving change the interaction of driving and consuming alcohol? Are you saying that it's OK to drink and drive if you have 5 years' driving experience?

Wouldn't it be better to increase the penalties for drinking and driving, rather than pretend that consuming alcohol always involves driving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
65. So when did you have your first drink?
Mine was Scotch at the tender age of 15.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
66. ? Then explain to me why it works in England, and other places in the world..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. OHNOES! Obama just lost the drunk driver vote! oh wait, my bad, they are Hillary's leftover base.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:43 PM by bushmeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thought they were the drunken Bush's leftover base n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone who thinks lowering the drinking age to 18
should spend a weekend here in Christchurch, New Zealand, or hop across the Tasman to Sydney. You'll change your mind right quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
40. Having lived in the state next to yours when that was the law, I remember it as no worse
and possibly better than having the age be 21 because we understood that we had the right AND the responsibility. The binge drinking phenomenon grew after the age was raised back up to 21 and as far as I can tell it made no difference on very young underage drinking either -- if anything, more 14-18 year olds seem to be drinking these days.

We stand apart from most of the world, where the minimum legal drinking age is mostly age 18 (if there is a stipulation at all.) Since everyone's favorite argument is about drinking and driving, perhaps those who don't drive should be allowed to drink at 18. Better yet perhaps no one should be able to drive until they're old enough to be responsible for their actions legally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hell they should raise it to 25
And enlistment too. At that age you should be mostly done with college or married with kids and drinking might not be what you want to do at that age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. I suppose he could have pandered and told the guy what he wanted to hear
But that's not leadership.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. there should only be laws against drunking,not drinking.
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 02:29 AM by Algorem
is obama still smoking?what's the smoking age?

the only thing he's going to end up lowering is his own expectations.


http://www.indiana.edu/~engs/articles/cqoped.html

...Research from the early 1980s until the present has shown a continuous decrease in drinking and driving related variables which has parallel the nation's, and also university students, decrease in per capita consumption. However, these declines started in 1980 before the national 1987 law which mandated states to have 21 year old alcohol purchase laws.

The decrease in drinking and driving problems are the result of many factors and not just the rise in purchase age or the decreased per capita consumption. These include: education concerning drunk driving, designated driver programs, increased seat belt and air bag usage, safer automobiles, lower speed limits, free taxi services from drinking establishments, etc.

While there has been a decrease in per capita consumption and motor vehicle crashes, unfortunately, during this same time period there has been an INCREASE in other problems related to heavy and irresponsible drinking among college age youth. Most of these reported behaviors showed little change until AFTER the 21 year old law in 1987. For example from 1982 until 1987 about 46% of students reported "vomiting after drinking." This jumped to over 50% after the law change. Significant increase were also found for other variables: "cutting class after drinking" jumped from 9% to almost 12%; "missing class because of hangover" went from 26% to 28%; "getting lower grade because of drinking" rose from 5% to 7%; and "been in a fight after drinking" increased from 12% to 17%. All of these behaviors are indices of irresponsible drinking. This increase in abusive drinking behavior is due to "underground drinking" outside of adult supervision in student rooms and apartments were same age individuals congregate and because of lack of knowledge of responsible drinking behaviors.

Based upon the fact that our current prohibition laws are not working, the need for alternative approaches from the experience of other, and more ancient cultures, who do not have these problems need to be tried. Groups such as Italians, Greeks, Chinese and Jews, who have few drinking related problems, tend to share some common characteristics. Alcohol is neither seen as a poison or a magic potent, there is little or no social pressure to drink, irresponsible behavior is never tolerated, young people learn at home from their parents and from other adults how to handle alcohol in a responsible manner, there is societal consensus on what constitutes responsible drinking. Because the the 21 year old drinking age law is not working, and is counterproductive, it behooves us as a nation to change our current prohibition law and to teach responsible drinking techniques for those who chose to consume alcoholic beverages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. So Obama, who admits to the use of illegal drugs as a teenager,
tells vets that they aren't capable of handling beer.
Isn't that a bit hypocritical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Sometimes one learns from their own mistakes, and learns not to
pass them on to others.

Alcohol is a dangerous matter, and has snuffed out many lives before it was required. I have seen lives destroyed by, specifically, underage drinking, and it was devastating. No need to increase that horror as being in war is bad enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
27. You mean he doesn't tell the crowd whatever will make them happy?
HOW WEIRD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fedja Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. The crowd isn't qualified to judge that decision..
due to being systematically misinformed in the past.

My country has an "official" drinking age of 18, but it's not enforced really, so just about anyone can go out to a cafe and have a beer. Sure, you may get laughed at by the waiter at 14, but anywhere over that is fair game.

"Drinking a beer" does not by default require you to be a mature adult.

However, our driving age is 18. Yes, driving is more important than having a beer, and we don't allow minors to drive cars that kill people in accidents even when driven responsibly.

Drunk driving is a different matter and in no way connected to the drinking age. Those 2 concepts about as relative to each other as "killing someone" and "having arms". When it comes to drunk driving, we have strict enforcement, cops sweeping random stops and testing people on weekend nights, astronomic fines, and many other legal provisions for the event.

- "a beer" is usually fine, if you don't down it right before you go drive
- "2-3 drinks" is a fine of approximately 50% of the average salary, and a repeat of this fine within 2 years is an automatic loss of license
- "being drunk" carries a gigantic fine, loss of driving license, ban on any kind of driving for 6 months-2 years...


It is my humble opinion that a country has grave issues to address when someone is old enough to buy a shotgun, but not old enough to have a beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. 20 year vet here... I'm in total agreement with Obama
I've spent too many nights escorting drunk shipmates home, and/or standing "drunkwatch" to make sure they didn't throw up and choke on their vomit while sleeping to really have much enthusiasm for lowering the drinking age. Not being able to drink didn't bother me while I was in the service from the age of 18-21, and it doesn't bother me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRK7376 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
60. I too have spent many a night
watching drunk soldiers stumble back into the barracks and sleep on the bunk springs rather than puke on the mattress. As a young junior officer many years ago on an exercise in Japan, I had a very, very drunk Major stumble back into our room, we had 8 officers in a small room in a Japanese Army barracks, he was assigned to our room. But this drunk major chose my bunk as his target that evening. He hurled all over my bunk then proceeded to sleep in it. He was too drunk to climb up into the rack above me that he was assigned to. Fortunately I was not in the bunk when this happend. If I drink, I will not drive....But for society to ok a young person to enlist and serve their country, they should be allowed to have a drink. Bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
34. The bottom line is that it is the states that decide the legal age to drink.
I happen to think if they're ready to have you fight and die, they should be willing to give you a beer before you go. Obama is entitled to his opinion - he does have a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rolleitreks Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
36. I think attitudes towards drunk driving have changed a lot in this country.
I'm doubt you'd have hordes of drunken 18 year olds out drinking and driving. You could also implement a zero tolerance law for people below age 21 having any alcohol in their system at all when driving. The US is practically alone in the world with high drinking age. I think it sends the wrong message, and probably encourages binge drinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. And, the high drinking age breeds disrespect for the law.
No one under the age of 21 refuses a drink because it's illegal. A 20 year old may refuse to drink for many reasons, but being underage is not one of the reasons. Let's be realistic.

Anyone under 21 who wants alcohol will get alcohol, with a variable range of difficulty. Especially 18, 19, and 20 year olds, who know they are technically and legally "adults", yet are prohibited from one specific substance, solely based on their age. This unfairness creates scorn and disrespect for laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Anyone with a net worth less that $1M should be excluded from combat
Make sure the ones who do the profiting are the only ones who take the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. That would end war for good!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
39. There is no proof that raising the drinking age lowers DUIs
And before you post a bunch of MADD stuff, please note the difference between correlation and causation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
43. I see lots of people here who hate the 21st Amendment but won't admit it. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. I favor much higher taxes on alcohol. I think people drink far too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #43
61. Six of one and all that.
There also seem to be people reading quite a bit of information about the opinions, ideals, mores and standards from a mere opinion or two from others...

Six of one and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. Huh? When does the president decide on the drinking age???
Isn't that a state, not federal function?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. I disagree with Obama here
And I'm amused by the people who honestly seem to believe the 21 drinking age actually stops people under 21 from drinking. Have you been to anywhere near a college campus lately?

I've got news for you: It doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
50. There goes the college votes
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
51. If it is all about drunk driving
Then raise the drinking age to 30 or 40. I agree, it doesn't compute that you can join the army at 18, yet not join your older comrades for a beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
58. "... before he turned 21 was that he couldn't come home and drink a beer.."
But let's be real.

He DID drink some beer before turning 21. So it wasn't legal, but he most certainly had access to alcohol after becoming an adult, but before turning 21.

How is any person supposed to respect a law unfair as that? The answer is, 18-20 year olds don't respect the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
62. lower the drinking age on post, it's a controlled environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
63. Lower the drinking age or raise the age to enlist in the military!
If your old enough to die in an illegal war, your old enough to drink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
64. Lower the drinking age, and be like the Yurpeens, who have VERY very strict drunk-driving laws, with
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 09:17 PM by kath
huge penalties for drunk drivers of ALL ages. This is by far the most sensible approach. Like in so many other areas, those pinko commie Yurpeens are WAY ahead of us...


on edit, wish I could post that great Steve Bell cartoon here, from Chimpy's first trip to Europe, where I first saw the term "Yurpeens". Chimpyshit is getting off of Air Force One and says "Is this Yurp? Are these Yurpeens?" and then, in small letters, "can I have my light saber?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC