Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pilot's gun discharges on US Airways flight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:48 PM
Original message
Pilot's gun discharges on US Airways flight
Source: WCNC TV

CHARLOTTE, N.C.-- A US Airways pilot’s gun accidentally discharged during a flight from Denver to Charlotte Saturday, according to as statement released by the airline. The statement said the discharge happened on Flight 1536, which left Denver at approximately 6:45am and arrived in Charlotte at approximately 11:51am. The Airbus A319 plane landed safely and none of the flight’s 124 passengers or five crew members was injured, according to the statement. It was a full flight. And airline spokeswoman said the plane has been taken out of service to make sure it is safe to return to flight. A Transportation Safety Administration spokeswoman reached by WCNC Sunday said the pilot is part of TSA’s Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program, which trains pilots to carry guns on flights. Andrea McCauley said the gun discharged in the cockpit, but she could not release how the gun was being transported at the time. She did not release the pilot’s name, but said he was authorized to carry the weapon and was last requalified in the FFDO program last November. A statement from TSA said the airplane was never in danger, and the TSA and the Federal Air Marshals Service are investigating the incident. WCNC reporter Diana Rugg is following up on this story.



Read more: http://www.wcnc.com/news/topstories/stories/wcnc-032308-sjf-gunonplane.1c4cabd1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Correction "Pilot discharges handgun.."
they don't go bang on their own...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe it was one of those special AI ones that think and go bang on their own?
Indeed, the writing puts responsibility onto the gun for discharging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Guns don't kill people
Pilots who don't know how to handle guns kill people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Maybe he left it in the oven. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Where do you get that from the article?
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 09:11 PM by wuushew
Unintended oxidation of explosives does seem consistent with the known rules of chemistry.

Jumping to the conclusion of pilot error seems imprudent without more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. never seen it.
fired thousands of rounds from various weapons. even the m16, that had a tendency to dimple rounds when the bolt released, never popped one.

Not saying it is not possible, just very very improbable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Almost impossible
Believe me this was pilot error. No excuse for a negligent discharge. For whatever reason he must've had it out of the holster and when handling had finger in trigger instead of along side the gun. BOOM! Wonder if any brown stain pants in cockpit!!!!! That had to be really loud in the enclosed space of a cockpit. Send that pilot back for retraining in firearms or pull his/her license to carry on planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Were you in the cockpit with the pilot?
If not, whatever you post is mere speculation, nothing more, nothing less.

Peopel who post absolutes without having the experience of being there to witness something are more often than not wannabe's who are looking for attention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. No - but you ask anyone who handles handguns
& incidentally I've been shooting competition for 10 years and shooting for 15. The kind of handgun that pilot would've been carrying wouldn't have gone off w/o him pressing the trigger.

People have Negligent Discharges most often when they are holstering/unholstering or when they drop a gun and instead of letting it hit the deck make a grab for it. BOOM.

I don't have to be in the cockpit to know the likely scenario. It wasn't ammo going off on its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I have experience with weapons as well
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 11:20 AM by Sweet Pea
and also know that accidental discharges CAN happen without anyone touching a trigger or in some cases the weapon itself. Corroded firing pins, eroded hammer stops, poorly maintained hardware - any number of reasons could have resulted in that weapon discharging accidentally without the pilot's hand even getting close to that trigger. You weren't there so you don't know shit about what happened. All you can do is speculate, and my fucking dog could speculate as well as you can, it appears.

Perhaps you do think you are the end all and be all as far as weapons are concerned (with a nick like Rambo, my doubts are erased) but I reiterate my initial comment - anyone who states an absolute without even being at the scene of whatever happened is a poseur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Well this expert agrees with me
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 12:09 PM by RamboLiberal
Mike Boyd, who runs the Colorado-based aviation consulting firm The Boyd Group, said: "The TSA has never been real supportive of this program. It's something I think Congress kind of put on them."

Boyd supports the program. He said the only way he can surmise a gun going off in flight is if it was not properly stored.

"A properly stored weapon with the safety on does not go off," he said. "The gun had to be out in the open. The gun had to be handled."

http://www.denverpost.com/rapids/ci_8686897

The pilots to my understanding carry H&Ks. A very fine very reliable handgun. He wasn't carrying some piece of shit firearm that goes off on its own. Someone or something touched that trigger! I hope they release the report cause I bet I'm right on this one.

I've trained with enough firearms with a number of experts to know that most ND's are caused by a human brain fart and not some mechanical problem, especially with modern firearms like this pilot would be carrying! I'd bet 99% on human brain fart less than 1% on mechanical problem with gun.

My bet since they were on landing approach is he was stowing the gun. I read that they have to have some kind of lock or have the weapon locked when off the plane. I'm not sure what TSA requires them to use. Another possibility is he forgot to use the decocking lever which you know makes it that much easier for a lighter trigger touch to fire the weapon.

And my inital reply wasn't to you but to poster who speculated some chemical reaction in ammo magically caused it to fire. If you're such an expert you know with modern handgun ammo that is virtually impossible!

On edit they do carry H&K.

"The training is very rigorous and extensive," Baird said, adding that crew members who completed the program were issued Heckler & Koch .40-caliber semiautomatic handguns. Some pilots carry guns that are loaded and ready to go, he said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-pilot25mar25,1,537268.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. Another expert
But they all carry the same gun, the high-priced and high-quality H&K USP, which Alter said was specially selected for the program. Gun safety expert Ronald Scott, a ballistics expert who served for 25 years with the Massachusetts State Police, said the gun wouldn't discharge accidentally if dropped or jarred in some way.

"It's a top-of-the-line model," Scott said. "They're accurate and highly reliable. This is not something that you would just walk into a gun store and buy. And it's also not something that goes off by itself. ... Someone would have to squeeze the trigger."

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hDecnvyEUT05TRqnyCbUfz9W5PegD8VKRCL00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Essentially, you're stating the gunpowder spontaneously combusted
FWIW, there are literally tons of surplus ammo on the market, some from WWII, that still functions properly when fired and doesn't explode randomly. You need extremely rapid oxidation, ie flame or spark from the primer, to set off the powder. A slow, steady oxidation of gunpowder simply converts it to fertilizer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ztarbod Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Absolutely correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. F*cking disaster waiting to happen. The plane was "never in any danger" my ass.
It was obviously in danger. The plane was hit by the bullet... obviously, because no people were.

Pilots are very busy people. Adding a gun to the mix is f*ing ridiculous! Anybody who claims the people on that plane were safer because of that gun's presence IS OUT OF HIS/HER MIND.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. many Air Force personnel
carry a weapon (used to be an m9) as part of their kit. Without hearing more it is not possible to get a good picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmm,his name
didn’t happen to be Barney did it? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. yup -- there we go.
you could see that coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. I guess the program just "trains pilots to carry guns on flights"
Apparently it does not train them in how and/or when to use them. If this jackass isn't fired, there will never be any excuse by any company to ever fire anyone for having done anything - ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. They have to requalify twice a year
The Federal Flight Deck Officer program, created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, trains eligible flight crew members in the use of firearms, use of force, legal issues, defensive tactics, the psychology of survival and standard operating procedures. Officers who carry firearms are required to requalify for the program twice a year.

"The training is very rigorous and extensive," Baird said, adding that crew members who completed the program were issued Heckler & Koch .40-caliber semiautomatic handguns. Some pilots carry guns that are loaded and ready to go, he said.

The pilot whose gun discharged Saturday last requalified on Nov. 7, according to the TSA statement.

"They go through same process it takes to join the FBI or other federal law enforcement organizations," Hesselbein said. "It's a stringent program. This was an accidental discharge -- no one wants to see this happen again. But it's a known risk, and they're going to see what they can do to make sure it doesn't happen again."

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-pilot25mar25,1,537268.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. THIS is the typical end result of having guns --- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. No, it's not typical...
...but statistically it's inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. And if fear of armed pilots prevents one plane full of people from crashing into a building
The danger of having pilots carrying guns is a small price to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. NORAD might actually come in handy to intercept planes . . .
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 01:46 PM by defendandprotect
and OOPS! that's exactly what they used to do prior to 9/11 --- !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sergeiAK Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. That might have an adverse effect
on the lives of those aboard. Are they expendable, because that's what you appear to be saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Living in Charlotte and forced to fly US "Scare" - this doesn't
surprise me at all. Worst airline ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. US AIR - Unfortunately Still Allegheny In Reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. And the plane did not experience an "explosive decompression"?
Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. They probably use bullets that specifically will NOT do that. I wonder
if the windows in the cockpit would be protected though. One would think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's a James Bond myth
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 01:33 PM by RamboLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. A bit more info
The Federal Air Marshall service said this is the first time anything like this has happened. Federal Flight Deck Officers use Heckler and Koch universal self-loading 40-caliber pistols and are allowed to carry these weapons ready to use -- like any other law enforcement officer. The Federal Flight Deck Officers need to be re-qualified twice a year.

A federal aviation security source told ABC the discharged round hit the side of the Airbus A319 and did not hit any sensitive equipment. The round likely exited the bulkhead but did not result in depressurization. The incident occurred on final approach.

TSA said passengers were not aware that the weapon was discharged and flight 1536 landed without incident.

The jet has been taken out of service for inspection.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/15690409/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. but, but, but... guns don't cause death
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 12:15 PM by fascisthunter
people with guns do...duh. It's why we need them so much....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
33.  Photos show bullet damage to plane
Source: Associated Press


In these undated images provided to the Associated Press, Tuesday, March 25, 2008, a purported bullet hole is shown in a US Airways aircraft. In the top photo a suspected bullet hole is shown in the left third of the photo. In the bottom photo the suspected bullet hole is shown in the bottom center of the photograph. A gunshot fired from a pistol belonging to the pilot of a US Airways flight blasted a small hole through the plane's cockpit wall. Airline officials have said the accidental discharge Saturday aboard Flight 1536 from Denver to Charlotte did not pose a danger to those on board.


CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Photos show that a shot fired from a US Airways pilot's pistol blasted a small hole through the cockpit wall of a plane that landed in North Carolina.

The photos obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press show a small entry hole in the lower side of the cockpit wall and a small exit hole on the exterior below the cockpit window.

The AP described the photos and the bullet hole to US Airways spokesman Phil Gee, who said "they sound authentic."

Airline officials have said the accidental discharge Saturday aboard Flight 1536 from Denver to Charlotte did not endanger those on board.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080325/ap_on_re_us/gun_on_plane_11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Oy. Well, at least the plane didn't undergo explosive depressurization....
It definitely could have turned out worse, I suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I think they have sealant to prevent that
There are too many things that can punch a small hole through an airliner in flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Paging AJNTSA Guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. That only happens in movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. As another poster pointed out - bullet explosive decompression
is a movie myth. Hey maybe the pilot was trying to be a mythbuster. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Was Hillary in the cockpit..
:evilgrin:

duck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Photo of pilot

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. CNN asked how gun goes off in plane
What I liked best about reporting on the accidental discharge of a gun in the cockpit of a US Airways flight to Charlotte, N.C., was the interview on CNN with a pilot (not the one who fired the gun). We news media types don’t know much about what happened in this incident. In fact, all we know is that a gun went off and the passengers didn’t even know about it. So the CNN reporter was asking questions like “How could a gun go off in an airplane?” … to which the pilot replied something like “Pretty much the same way it does on the ground.” Yup.

http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/andersmeanders/entries/2008/03/25/when_pilots_fire_accident.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. In other words, he was playing with it because he was bored
or trying to show off what a stud he is.

He was just damned lucky it didn't wipe out any of the important stuff living behind that cockpit wall.

That asshole should never be allowed to carry a gun on board again. He's proven he can't be trusted with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. The only way the gun could go off
would be if the hammer was cocked. Anyone carrying a gun in such a manner is an idiot (barring law enforcement). Having the safety off as well makes him a fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. No - hammer doesn't have to be cocked
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 04:06 AM by RamboLiberal
I'm not quite as familar with H&K as I am with Sigs, Glocks and S&W M&P but I believe the H&K he may have been carrying has a decocker and a safety.

Obviously the saftey had to be off.

Now he may have forgotten to use the decocker when he chambered the round. Therefore the gun would be in single action mode, i.e. only a light press against trigger would fire it.

Or if hammer down then a double action discharge could happen, but he'd have to have pulled a heavier trigger.

My guess is he was stowing the gun in carry case since they were on landing approach and either inadvertently pressed the trigger or dropped the gun and tried to grab as it was falling(I've heard of several NDs that way). I sure hope he wasn't showing it off in the cockpit.

But they all carry the same gun, the high-priced and high-quality H&K USP, which Alter said was specially selected for the program. Gun safety expert Ronald Scott, a ballistics expert who served for 25 years with the Massachusetts State Police, said the gun wouldn't discharge accidentally if dropped or jarred in some way.

"It's a top-of-the-line model," Scott said. "They're accurate and highly reliable. This is not something that you would just walk into a gun store and buy. And it's also not something that goes off by itself. ... Someone would have to squeeze the trigger."


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hDecnvyEUT05TRqnyCbUfz9W5PegD8VKRCL00

H&K USP



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Actually.....here is the pic of the "air marshall"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I thought for sure this was a thread about Hillary
And how a bullet hole in an airplane proves she was telling the truth. I guess I've spent too much time in GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. fighter pilot wanna be. I'd say he almost shot off his knee cap
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 04:47 PM by ohio2007
playing with the safety on that gun ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heliarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Wonder if he was aiming for Paul Prudhomme


http://www.wwltv.com/

Or if he shot Prudhomme accidentally :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. Shouldn't be a problem for someone with certain
skills

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. J-B Weld rocks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
52. I speculated it happened as he was stowing the weapon
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 04:22 AM by RamboLiberal
Since that made the most sense of why he had it out of the holster. Looks like that is what happened.

The report also revealed that the captain of Flight 1536 from Denver fired the shot as he "was stowing his weapon." The captain was carrying the 13-shot pistol as part of the Federal Flight Deck Officer program run by the federal Transportation Security Administration.

Officials have declined to say why the captain's weapon wasn't in his holster or flight bag.

TSA spokesman Nelson Minerly declined to say exactly how many pilots carry guns or under what circumstances they can have them out during a flight. But while they're in the cockpit, pilots in the program are supposed to wear the guns, and the guns should be loaded, Minerly said.

"Anytime the weapon is on the person," he said, "it needs to be ready to fire."


http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/552793.html

I don't know if the pilots are given a holster and of what type or if they can select their own. What they should have if they are stowing the guns in bags is a paddle holster so they don't have to remove the gun from the holster or have to get the holster off their belt. That way the gun can stay safely in the holster when taking off and putting on the holster.

I do wonder if he may have forgetten to decock the pistol when he originally chambered the round. It's an easy step to forget when chambering a round. But with the H&K the safety also had to be off. Well somehow he got his finger or something in the trigger with sufficient pressure to make it fire.

I understand they use a lock box when weapon not on their person.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
53. Probably drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. I seriously doubt that - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC