Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heavy Troop Deployments Are Called Major Risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:08 PM
Original message
Heavy Troop Deployments Are Called Major Risk
Source: Washington Post

Senior Army and Marine Corps leaders said yesterday that the increase of more than 30,000 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan has put unsustainable levels of stress on U.S. ground forces and has put their readiness to fight other conflicts at the lowest level in years.

In a stark assessment a week before Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, is to testify on the war's progress, Gen. Richard A. Cody, the Army's vice chief of staff, said that the heavy deployments are inflicting "incredible stress" on soldiers and families and that they pose "a significant risk" to the nation's all-volunteer military.

"When the five-brigade surge went in . . . that took all the stroke out of the shock absorbers for the United States Army," Cody testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee's readiness panel.

He said that even if five brigades are pulled out of Iraq by July, as planned, it would take some time before the Army could return to 12-month tours for soldiers. Petraeus is expected to call for a pause in further troop reductions to assess their impact on security in Iraq.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040102444.html?hpid=topnews



Yep, Bush broke the military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. "to assess their impact on security in Iraq"
What about OUR freaking security?

Supposedly the best military in the world, but we have so burned it out that if paraguay or somebody wanted to invade, we'd probably have to resort to nukes...

oh, wait...

that's what they want to play with anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney says..
How do you like my sig line? Just made it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Petraeus has one job - Iraq, our national security is not his job.
And the guy who's job it is, happens to be an intellectual midget and a moral disgrace who could not care less about "the details" of such things.

Iraq, Iran that's it. God told him so.

And then it's off to do color commentary on the baseball game and then off to sleep like a baby.

It must be so odd to be so detached from both any sense of moral conscience and the realities of the horrors your behaviors have created. But that's our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Strangely enough, clinton lauded him.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Her base (the corporations) demand it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dontcha just love doing this...
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 09:52 AM by LynnTheDem
"To point out that our military has been overextended, taken for granted and neglected, that’s no criticism of the military. That is criticism of a president and vice president and their record of neglect."

GEORGE W. bUSH, 2000

Throw the MFers' own words back in his ugly face, but the rightwingnuts are too stupid and too immoral to give a fuck anyways. Just like their hero, George W. bUsh.

Stupidest MFers ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. the recommendation is 12 mo. downrange, 24 mo. home
As stressed as the army is right now, 12m/24m, although better than the current 15+/12-, is still just a spartan remedy, Bush has deteriorated the armed forces that much.

And wouldn't ya know, he never served, nor Cheney, so they're not likely to sympathize considering all the bucks they're making off the backs of those who, as Cheney put it, "volunteered."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC