Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Stabenow's husband tells police he had sex with prostitute

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:51 PM
Original message
Sen. Stabenow's husband tells police he had sex with prostitute
Source: Associated Press

4/2/2008, 1:06 p.m. EDT
By NATASHA ROBINSON
The Associated Press

TROY, Mich. (AP) — The husband of U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow told police he used the Internet to make a date with a prostitute and paid her $150 for sex at a hotel, according to a police report.

Thomas Athans, 46, co-founder of the liberal TalkUSA Radio network, was stopped by police who were investigating Internet-based prostitution at the hotel, according to a police report obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press under the state Freedom of Information Act.

The Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News first reported on the case in stories on their Web sites.

Stabenow, in a statement, said it was "very disturbing and serious. Obviously it's a deeply difficult and personal matter."

Read more: http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/news-52/1207151651221760.xml&storylist=newsmichigan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a sad thing, she's a nice lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She would be a great pick for VP if not for where she was born
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Are you thinking of Jennifer Granholm, who was from Canada?
To my knowledge, Stabenow was born in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That was indeed what I was thinking
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Gladwin, Michigan?
I'm pretty sure that's where she was born...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Doh! I had her confused with Gov. Granholm
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Ah, that makes more sense
I'm not so sure about Stabenow being VP material. But Granholm, she's pretty darn good - especially considering the state of the state of Michigan these days. She's got a tough job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Not in my opinion. Nope.
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 02:43 PM by TahitiNut
Far too many Bush-enabling votes for my taste, including the despicable Bankruptcy legislation. :puke:

She's one of my Senators (the other is Carl Levin) and I just couldn't vote for her last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It's a good thing that nobody is taking your advice then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
78. She's a nice lady when she isn't voting for torture. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I recently "slept" with a prostitute LOL
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:04 PM by featherman
On a plane trip from New York to Atlanta. She was my right hand seat mate on the flight and had been in New York getting interviewed by various shows as an "expert" on the Spitzer scandal. After an interesting conversation with her about her line of work at the famous Moonlit Bunny Ranch, we both napped a bit. My spouse was on my left in the other seat so I guess that was really kinky. LOL

On edit: sorry. Didn't mean to make light of Ms. Stabenow's heartbreak and embarrassment but couldn't resist the topical opening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Legalize prostitution. It's no crime to want to have sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I find it disturbing and serious too that
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:01 PM by LoZoccolo
- tax dollars in Michigan, where I grew up and where my brother still lives, and is facing economic difficulties, are being spent on this frivolous sting operation for a victimless crime that people wouldn't even know is going on and...
- going in and out of a hotel room within fifteen minutes is considered probable cause of anything at all and...
- this guy seemingly didn't know that you do not tell the police anything; they will probably not go easy on you if you talk because there's no reason for them to do so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No victim? Isn't he married? Isn't Sen. Stabenow a victim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Do the police also set up sting operations to catch people having affairs? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Prostitution is a crime for many reasons including disease and public health
If you are seriously going to compare prostitutes, selling themselves to hundreds of men, with the average woman involved in an "affair" you are living in an alternative universe. What disease has this guy transmitted to the Senator? Who knows? She will have to get tested. You were the one who said there were no victims. I don't care what kind of conduct police target -- there are victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Do the police also set up sting operations to catch people having promiscuous uprotected sex? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I notice you have evaded the question - Is Sen. Stabenow a victim or not?
You said it is a victimless crime in your post. So what is your answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. In my opinion, Sen. Stabenow didn't become a victim
until she was informed of her husband's "crime".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. And you DON'T think she became a victim the first time she had unprotected sex with Mr. S.
AFTER he got home from the hooker?

For the love of God, get the senator to an STD test NOW. No Joke.

And have Mr. S. fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. But she didn't KNOW she was a victim til
her husband was arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. If he had bareback sex with a hooker, that doesn't matter.
Enough with the hairsplitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #64
83. He could have done that with anyone......
not necessarily a hooker.

My point is that the industry should be legalized and regulated, as it already is in many European countries.

And the people that work in that industry should not have to worry about being victimized by the judicial system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #83
109. The point is, the man endangered his wife's health and thus DID victimize her.
The fact that she didn't know of this until the story blew up hardly changes that.

And I'm not blaming the sex worker here, I'm blaming the senator's scumbag of a husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Yes, and prostitution is a victimless crime.
Adultery is not a victimless act.
Pimping is not a victimless crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #40
82. And if this woman had a pimp?
It sounds like she did, from the article. So ... not a victimless crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #82
110. Prostitution is a victimless crime. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. No, it's not.
If she is a victim of human trafficking, she's being raped.

A person buying a prostitute from Craigslist - much less one who says someone else set it up for her (sounds like a pimp to me) - has no way to know her circumstances or if she's even in a position to give consent. It's like shooting a gun into a crowd with a blindfold on, you don't know if you're going to victimize someone or not when you do it.

You aren't in a position to know if she's a victim or not.

Neither is anyone else on this forum - yet all the sympathy seems to be going to Debbie Stabenow, a privileged woman with power, and nobody seems to have 2 words of concern about a woman whose body someone else is arranging to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. Human trafficking is not a victimless crime.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 08:44 PM by LoZoccolo
Prostitution is a victimless crime.

We could go on and on but I'd just look like the smarter one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #113
114. How can you separate the two
if the person doing the prostitution is a trafficking victim? That makes the John a rapist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #114
116. How can you conflate the two
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:33 PM by LoZoccolo
if the person doing the prostitution is not a trafficking victim?

Some Chinese restaurants got busted this week for bringing in trafficked indentured servants. Are we going to get rid of Chinese restaurants? Are they going to be illegal now? That makes you a slavedriver, by the way!

Some concepts to assist you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #116
120. That's a big IF
the point is you DON'T know, and the odds are food if you pay to screw a woman, that she's not there willingly. In the netherlands, the estimate is 1 out of 4 women working as a prostitute is a sex slave - being raped daily. So a man there who buys rights to women there just twice has a 50-50 chance of being a rapist - and the people who support that really don't give a famn, they care more that a man has the right to jam his d*** into another person than they do about rape. And they hold that up as a shining veacon of sexual liberation. When a quarter of the women are in slavery, that's only liberation for men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #113
122. Look like the smarter one? Only if you're the only one looking at these posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
76. This is a very strange path that you're following. Currently marriage does not have a bearing on...
the legality of the sexual activities performed by the married couple. Adultery is no longer a criminal offense. So she's not a crime victim. Turning back the clock on this would re-open a whole lot of issues concerning government regulation of sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. They do at the Minneapolis Airport
Just ask Larry Craig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
70. Prostitutes are known disease vectors.
Prostitution is linked to human trafficking, child sex workers, drugs and organized crime. Most people don't want hotels full of hookers in their neighborhoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #70
85. Most people don't want hotels full........
And that's why there should be clearly defined districts in each community where the trades are practiced.

Workers go to these districts to work. When they are not working, the workers go home to their families. This has worked well for decades for many countries in Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkInLA Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. If we follow your logic...
...then we may as well make it illegal for anyone to have more than "x" number of sex partners per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Technically in most states it already is if you are married.
But I have a feeling that term has no meaning to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. adultery is not illegal.
unless money is exchanged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #48
100. It's a felony in Michigan.
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
#
750.29 Adultery; definition.
Sec. 29.

Definition - Adultery is the sexual intercourse of 2 persons, either of whom is married to a third person.
#
750.30 Adultery; punishment.
Sec. 30.

Punishment - Any person who shall commit adultery shall be guilty of a felony; and when the crime is committed between a married woman and a man who is unmarried, the man shall be guilty of adultery, and liable to the same punishment.

http://www.sherlockpi.com/infidelity-cases/michigan-adultery-law.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
104. Not everyone is monogamous, or has a monogamous relationship
Please stop projecting your personal morality on other people and their relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. If the industry were legalized and regulated............
then disease and public health concerns wouldn't even be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
71. If only.
Those arguments have long proven false in Germany and the Netherlands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #71
86. Prove it. Please provide a link...........
From all that I have seen and heard, the workers seem to be faring well in Europe.

These workers earn a living, take care of their families, pay their taxes and take annual vacations if they want. If a customer refuses to pay or steps out of line, they can call the police and make a complaint.

In Europe, the TRADE is a way to earn a living, nothing else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #86
96. In another thread
on this subject, someone posted a link saying that as the fees for being liscenced are high that many decide to go solo and it has not taken the problem of unregulated prostitutes off the streets in these countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #96
99. Well, that may be a "free market" issue..........
A person in the market for such services knows that he or she is taking a risk by using the cheaper services provided by an unregulated worker.

But my whole point in all of this is that it is counter-productive to make laws and use law enforcement resources to prevent adults from having $ex.

It hasn't worked for any length of time for any society in the past and it will never work for any society for any lengthh of time in the future!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
57. husbands of senators at least..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. no, she's not a victim, as she wasn't involved.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Not involved?
How about when she has sex with her husband? How about the smirks she knows she will get from her constituents? How about the fact that every other U.S. Senator will be thinking about this when she talks to them -- and she knows that? Oh, she's involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. not involved.
what about when she has sex with her husband? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #61
126. It's called the spread of disease. Understand now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
84. They only got married in 2003
Maybe it was a political marriage. She'd been divorced from the father of her children since 1990 and perhaps she found it's better to have a spouse in the senate. And as far as he is concerned, I'm sure marrying her was a step up for his business interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. That is the first thing I was thinking also. What do we care what her
husband is doing? It in no way makes her less effective at the job she is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Must be something...
because she voted for everything bush wanted...thats why she won't get my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. She may disagree with you. Especially if she catches a disease from him.
Do you really think she has no emotional feelings over this? Are they going to make her "less effective" at her job? It is pretty presumptuous of you to say this will have no effect on her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. I was not referring to the victimless crime part - I was referring to
using tax payers money in a case that no one else would have bothered to look at if he was not her husband. Do you think they would be chasing our husbands around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. I think the Senator needs to lose about a hundred and eighty pounds, or so.
A divorce might help her drop that weight QUICK!

I think this situation does make her less effective. When one has trouble at home, it affects work, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
56. LOL
with that I looked up her photo

She is almost 60 years old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #56
115. Never too late to trade the old dead weight in for a better model.
A smarter one, at the very least.

She oughta go younger, like those "cougars" do nowadays. Can't hurt!

Teresa Heinz got herself a young 'un, relatively speaking. So can the affronted Senator, if she has a mind to!

I hope she does--living well is always the best revenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
79. Why are you commenting on her body here? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #79
89. The 180 lbs is her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. Ahhh!
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 09:39 AM by lwfern
Okay, that's kind of funny, then. :)

(will drink more coffee here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. I thought the same thing at first-
Then I remembered the old joke- Want to lose 180 pounds of dead weight? Break up with him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #92
117. It's "jokes" like that
that make men seek the company of other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #79
106. Reread the post. Slowly, carefully. Without an expectation, or a shoulder chip.
The "weight" to be lost was the SENATOR'S HUSBAND, a hundred and eighty pounds being the weight of an average fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. It's already been explained. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Ah, good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Apperently they did go easy on him
Police did not bring any sex charges against him but later mailed him a ticket for driving with a suspended license.

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/news-52/1207151651221760.xml&storylist=newsmichigan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
77. It's not a victimless crime
We have human trafficking victims in the metro detroit area here. When you buy access to women's bodies, whether it's as a prostitute or in a strip club, the reality is that you don't know (or presumably care to know) whether they are sex slaves or not. Their situation, their humanity, really isn't a concern for the purchaser.

http://www.humantrafficking.org/updates/682/

I'm sorry that some folks think that women being raped daily and held hostage is a "frivolous" thing to worry about. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the relevance of this story is what?
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 01:06 PM by madinmaryland
Oh yea, because Fox Noise and the M$M say it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. No. It's because ...
... the Residence Inn a mere 3.5 miles to the north of me might be more fun than I thought. I'll have to check out those 900 sq' suites.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. She has only been married to him for a few years..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is what I think is more interesting
"co-founder of the liberal TalkUSA Radio network".

Liberals and Dems have been getting caught in a lot of stings lately. Some of this may a purposeful campaign from the RW leadership of our govt. Siegleman, Spitzer, now this guy. Could he have been set up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Did someone force him to use the internet to contact the prostitute?
Did someone force him to go to the motel? Set up??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. No but I bet they gleamed the info through warrant-less wire tapping of his web surfing habits!
Beware Big Brother is watching you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. I'd be happy to take that bet. A judge approved a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
63. Was that before or after they found out he was stuffing this pro?
I heard he did not make the withdrawals large enough to warrant a look by regulators. He was wiretapped on and then they started to look into the finances and got a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. You may be on to something........
Maybe this wasn't the first time you used the internet to set up a date.

Maybe his internet usage was being monitored, for the sake of National Security, due to the fact that he was a member of a subversive organization bent on spreading anti-repuke propaganda across the nation.

Just sayin'............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who gives a shit? Is he legislating "moral values?" No. Prosecuting other johns? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinerow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. He's a much more savvy shopper than Spitzer.
What? What did I say? Ow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. TTIWWP.
Perhaps then I can weigh in.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. Love your sig-line quote
One of my favs. :toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
69. Shakespeare, from "Branagh V" or something like that.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #69
101. It's the "once more unto the breach" soliloquy...
...for those keeping score at home. :thumbsup:

Personally, I can't wait for Branagh VI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #101
111. That one will actually be called "The YORKINATOR".
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #111
121. "They lost France, so one man is going to make England BLEED."
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. I knew you would be posting this when I heard the news
Anytime a Democrat gets in the slightest trouble, you are all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Who said that this guy was a Democrat?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. His wife is, that was your main reasoning
for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #45
65. You, otoh, would never have posted it
I'd rather hear the good as well as the not-so-good and make my own judgments.

I've seen a disturbing number of posts lately criticizing the messengers, and most of them include an insinuation or character smear.

Stubbs has been here for six years and almost 20,000 posts. He's got the right to post whatever he damn well pleases, and I have the right to read or not read his posts as I see fit, without interference or suppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #45
72. Maria Shriver is a Democrat. Is her husband a Democrat?
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 07:37 AM by Freddie Stubbs
Do you get angry when people post something less than flattering about him?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
103. Co-founder of Liberal Talk Network-You have been busted
again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. All liberals are Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Is it more appropriate to deny that Dems are occasionally idiotic (or worse), too?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
118. sorry, but i want to know of news of Democrats involved in this shit also
so i don't sound like a fool when i bring up the Vitter,Foley, Craig stuff to pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. Only an asshole would rejoice at Debbie Stabenow's misfortune. Consider the source. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #46
73. The Associated Press are assholes?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
49. OK...Stabenow is married to an asshole.....
And your point is...?

(Other than that the guy should probably sleep on his stomach tonight?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
51. Poor Debbie.
She deserves better than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
52. We celebrate and dance when it is a Republican who gets caught in sex hanky-panky,
but we beg off and make excuses when it is a Democrat, claiming it was a victimless crime or that prostitution should be legalized, or that it is a conspiracy just to get Democrats. Whether any of these actions are victimless or not, or whether the actions should be decriminalized, the point it that these things happen to people regardless of their party affiliation. That being said, there is little we can do in life of any importance that does not have an impact upon the lives of other people--friends, family, or even constituents. No man or woman is an island and life is much about choices and consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. What a pig.
I'd divorce him if that happened to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why the fuck do they have to interject Limbaugh's 2 cents worth?
This pisses me off to no end - who the hell is that fat bastard to comment on ANYONE'S situation, given his seedy past?

I live for the day when Limbaugh's obit appears in print..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. Because AP stands for "Advanced Propaganda". The AP is a fascist
tool and it is only natural for them to refer to other fascists, like Limbaugh, for their content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #54
68. Don't hold you're breath on that one. Limbaugh's among the undead.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
60. I'll never forgive Debbie for siding with the 'credit card bankers' and voting for the bankruptcy
"reform" bill however, I sympathize with her in this time of great personal distress...

Yes she is MY Senator from the great State of Michigan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
66. High powered woman with a dog of a husband. Sounds familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
67. What is it about these prostitutes?
Geeze!

Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
74. $150. It would take him a long time to match Spitzers $80k total
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #74
102. He's fiscally conservative...Good for him!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
75. Top 2 marrige spoilers
- Money $$$$$
- Sex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
80. Another example of how the system is stacked against women.
She has a pretrial hearing scheduled. He has no charges against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #80
88. Tell that to Elliot Spitzer. He is the one in hot water, not the ho.
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 09:20 AM by Freddie Stubbs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #88
91. "ho" is not an appropriate way to refer to a woman. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #91
93. It is usually a disrespectful to use the term, unless it is actually the person's profession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #93
94. "prostitute" is a profession. "Ho" is a gender slur. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. It is only a slur to prostitutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
81. Looks like the sex life of every Dem in the US is going to be investigated
between now and November. Get ready for the sleaziest campaign in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
87. This must be what Karl Rove has been up to...
go around the country and help his US Attorneys nail Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #87
123. This is not a federal case. It was a state case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
95. Why is this news? Who cares? Next we'll have a report on Britney's latest mental distress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
97. Good GRIEF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stupid sluts all over the place. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
119. I hope she dumps him instead of plays the good little wife.
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 04:00 AM by superconnected
If nothing else he's a health risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
124. Anyone who claims the husband is a health risk is assuming they are having sex..
There are a lot of "platonic" marriages out there..

The point being that we do not know the relationship between these two people and anyone making judgments either way is assuming information that they do not have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
125. Take this thread down, please.
It has been up five days and is an embarrassment to Sen. Stabenow. She doesn't deserve this. It is about her husband, not her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC