Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats: McCain Financing Questionable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 02:40 PM
Original message
Democrats: McCain Financing Questionable
Source: Associated Press

Democrats: McCain Financing Questionable

AP foreign, Sunday April 13 2008

By HOPE YEN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic Party officials want a
federal judge to order an investigation into whether Sen.
John McCain violated election laws by withdrawing from
public financing, saying federal regulators are too weak
to act on their own.

A lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission, to be
filed Monday in U.S. District Court, questions the agency's
ability to enforce the law and review McCain's decision
to opt out of the system. The Republican presidential
candidate, who had been entitled to $5.8 million in federal
funds for the primary campaign, decided earlier this year
to give up that money so he could avoid strict spending
limits between now and the GOP's national convention in
September.

During a conference call with reporters Sunday, DNC
officials said the FEC is unable to act because four of
its six seats are vacant. They want a judge to either
order the FEC to begin an immediate review, or allow the
Democratic Party to file a lawsuit against McCain's
campaign challenging his decision.

Tom McMahon, the party's executive director, said “there
is a compelling public interest in determining whether
Senator McCain agreed to participate in the matching funds
program so he could get a loan for his campaign, then
violated the terms of that agreement so he could ignore
the spending cap and raise unlimited money from lobbyists
and special interests.”

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/7459379
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fighting back.
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Democratic Party officials...saying federal regulators are too weak to act on their own. Pot, kettle
Questionable? The word is I*L*L*E*G*A*L. Christ, they expect us to care about what they're doing about it (which will be nothing, new verse same as the first) if they can't even call it what it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. For Credibility's sake, I really hope Obama toes the
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 04:03 PM by ShockediSay
line if McCain must
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive_realist Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No
Obama has never filed to receive matching funds; McCain has. McCain has broken the law by exceeding the limits after agreeing to them.

The only reason to want Obama to adhere to the spending limits required to get matching funds is to decrease his chances of winning the GE. Are you a Democrat or not?

And yes, I'm well aware of Obama's statement that he would like to reach an agreement with the Republican candidate to both adhere to the limits. In light of the fact that McCain has already broken them after agreeing to them, Obama would have to be stupid to agree to them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. No, but in 2007 he signed saying he would take federal funds if
he was the nominee...yeah, he didn't file, but it's a pledge and everyone knows it. He is under no legal obligation to take federal funds, but this lawsuit will be turned back on the Dems by highlighting Obama not keeping his word. Too bad so many Dems voted for this schmuck without realizing he isn't ready for prime time. Say hello to President mcCain...let's just hope the Dems in Congress finally grow spines so he can be kept in check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive_realist Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not quite
Unless you can provide a link to the contrary. His statement was that he would accept federal funds only if the Republican nominee did the same. Since McCain has broken his pledge, Obama is no longer obligated (ethically, since he was never legally obligated) to keep his side of that deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's got Hilliary's support so its all good, who cares what Dean thinks anyway. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. keep the pressure on, the way all those criminals
in charge have been doing. Keep them busy, don't let them have an idle minute. Hopefully they will make an irreversible mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bow-tie Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If Hillary is forced
out she'll probably endorse McNuts. I used to be a Hillary supporter until I saw her in action in this campaign. It's going to get where no one will want to be prez except criminals and power hungry assholes. Both sides, look who steps up. A truely great guy, DK, get's pushed out before he get's started. ??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. As an aside, since you bring up Kucinich, let me say I have finally resolved
why it is that I could never get behind him wholeheartedly. I think it is this: Kucinich has really excellent ideas. He comes as close to expressing my political wishes as anyone on the national scene is ever likely to do. HOWEVER, I think he lacks the people skills necessary to serve effectively in office. I think he would be too inflexible to engage a broad cross-secion of the country in weaving together the practical patchworks we will need to create in order to solve our problems. Obama, on the other hand, seems to have those people skills, and will be able to pull us together--even though I am less enamored of his starting premises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftrightwingnut Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Endorse McCain? Hell, it's the new dream team: McCain - Clinton!
They are using the same advisers and talking points. They may as well run together.

If Hillary wants to go atomic, that's the way to do it. Threatening to go independent won't do her any good. Threatening to align with McCain might just get her some consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentj44 Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. well does this mean
they can stop mccain from running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. If a Democrat had been doing this, it'd be a nightly news headline
until said Democrat capitulated and apologized and offered themselves up for summary execution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Questionable? Criminal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. The lawsuit won't work
Obama has a hold in the Senate on the four nominees for the vacant seats. If he released his hold the Senate could vote on the nominees and the Federal Election Commission would be at full strength. The judge is just going to say release the hold, vote on the nominees, and problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Got a link for that?
You say that Obama has a hold on the 4 nominees for the vacant seats. I'd like to see a link to that please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sure.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/02/25/obama-hold-source-of-mccains-money-woes/. There are dozens of links if you just google it. That is just one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC