The RNC treasurer who was faking audits while money disappeared was linked to Wachovia. Note: if anyone knows whether Grover Norquist had ties to either Christopher Ward, his company, or Wachovia, please send me a private message.
NRCC Treasurer Under Scrutiny Was Thought of as 'Gold Standard'
By Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01
In the tiny world of people who keep the books for Washington's multitude of political committees, Christopher J. Ward was considered the Republican "gold standard," in the words of a former co-worker -- one of the few people with so much expertise in election law that everyone wanted Ward's services.
The quiet workaholic is listed as treasurer for 83 GOP fundraising committees over the past eight years, according to Federal Election Commission records. In the past five years alone, he oversaw the accounting for committees that raised more than $400 million, $368 million of it at the National Republican Congressional Committee, according to a Washington Post review of those records.
But in late January, Ward, 39, was dismissed as the NRCC announced that it had found financial "irregularities" that "may include fraud." The FBI is investigating what appears to be "a significant amount of money" missing from the House Republican fundraising arm, according to a law enforcement official.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/12/AR2008031204051_pf.htmlAlso, in this same time period, Ward started or moved the bank accounts for these funds to Wachovia Bank. The article notes that it was a loan from Wachovia that first alerted the NRCC to the forged audit.
NRCC officials contacted the FBI soon after discovering that the former employee, Christopher J. Ward, had submitted what they believe to be a fake internal audit to Wachovia as part of a loan application by the committee.
But here's the interesting thing about those accounts at Wachovia. In spite of the fact that Ward served as treasurer for a bunch of PACs and other funds using Wachovia, he didn't have those accounts all at one branch. He had them spread out at branches around DC and (in at least one case) in North Carolina. I suspect such an arrangement would make it easy to move between accounts while still hiding some of that movement. Add in the fact that all the NRCC's accounts got merged into one, and it sure seems like the set-up would make it relatively easy to launder money through these various accounts--presumably to benefit the people who were managing the books, but almost certainly also to launder soft money into hard, so it could be used directly on campaign expenses.
Mind you, this is all a big guess. But to this non-expert, it does look like the changes made it easier to move money between the various kinds of accounts at RNCC and in PACs to make it available for campaigns.
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/02/27/enron-accounting/