Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chavez ridicules Interpol report on rebels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:07 PM
Original message
Chavez ridicules Interpol report on rebels
Source: Associated Press

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is denouncing as "ridiculous" an Interpol report on documents that Colombia says were retrieved from the computers of slain rebels.

Chavez says a "show of clowns" has surrounded the announcement by the international police agency that it found no evidence of tampering with the computers.

Colombia maintains the documents suggest close links between the rebels and the Venezuelan government.

Chavez responded to a question on the matter at a news conference on Thursday denouncing what he called disinformation by a "media dictatorship."

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080515/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/venezuela_chavez_interpol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interpol's press release
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:28 PM by Andrushka
stated:

"INTERPOL's report also emphasized that the remit of its technical examination was not to evaluate the accuracy or the source of the exhibits’ content."
http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/PressReleases/PR2008/PR200817.asp

So, in other words, they could have been given a laptop with any old shit on it. All they had to do is verify that there was no "tampering."

Guess if it was put there in the first place by the Colombians, that would be pretty much guaranteed!

"However, between 1 and 3 March, direct access to the seized computer exhibits by Colombia's first responder anti-terrorist unit in order to view and download their contents did not follow internationally recognized principles in the handling of electronic evidence under ordinary circumstances."

:eyes:

Go to BoRev.Net for the "celebration" of Laptop Day. It's all you need to read: http://www.borev.net/

(on edit: HTML formatting)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interpol: Colombia has real rebel data
"We are absolutely certain that the computer exhibits that our experts examined came from a FARC terrorist camp," said Interpol's secretary general, Ronald Noble, adding: "No one can ever question whether or not the Colombian government tampered with the seized FARC computers."

Colombian commandos recovered the three Toshiba Satellite laptop computers, two external hard drives and three USB memory sticks after destroying the rebel camp just across the border in Ecuador. FARC foreign minister Raul Reyes and 24 others were killed in the March 1 raid.

Chavez has mocked Colombia's revelations about "the supposed computer of Raul Reyes" and questioned how a computer could survive a bombardment. He denies arming or funding the FARC, though he openly sympathizes with Latin America's most powerful rebel army.

Venezuela's embassy in Washington accused U.S. and Colombian officials of using the Interpol report to "spread the most reckless and irresponsible accusations" in a coordinated campaign that "closely resembles the steps usually taken by the Bush administration in order to generate ... instability and wars in other countries."

But Interpol was emphatic that the documents are authentic, and said the computers were found in metal cases that protected them during the raid.

"Mr. Reyes is now dead. But they were definitely his computers, his disks, his hardware," Noble said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080515/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/colombia_rebel_computers;_ylt=Am3ow.Xvwsun.q5md6uOMQm3IxIF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. how it could survive a bombardment?
anyone notice that nasa just recovered data from a hard drive that was on the Columbia and spent two years sitting in a field in Texas? unless there was a strong electro-magnetic field involved, data is recoverable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. People and things survive bombardment all the time
if it wasn't a direct hit then the fact that it survived is no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. Of course it could survive intact AND untampered with
after all, the passport of one of the hijackers was found in the rubble of the trade towers. War is peace, up is down, the government and corporate media don't lie.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. People will believe what the want to believe
this is one of those issues that no one will agree on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Yeah, there's no way it could've survived the bombardment
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080509/ap_on_hi_te/shuttle_recovered_data

Data from Columbia disk drives survived the shuttle accident
Fri May 9, 2008

Jon Edwards often manages what appears impossible. He has recovered precious data from computers wrecked in floods and fires and dumped in lakes. Now Edwards may have set a new standard: He found information on a melted disk drive that fell from the sky when space shuttle Columbia disintegrated in 2003. "When we got it, it was two hunks of metal stuck together. We couldn't even tell it was a hard drive. It was burned and the edges were melted," said Edwards, an engineer at Kroll Ontrack Inc., outside Minneapolis. "It looked pretty bad at first glance, but we always give it a shot."

Edwards had reason for pessimism. Not only were the drive's metal and plastic elements scorched, but the seal on the side that keeps out dirt and dust also had melted. That made the drive vulnerable to particles that can scratch the tiny materials embedded inside, destroying their ability to retain data in endless 0s or 1s, depending on their magnetic charge.

However, at the core of the drive, the spinning metal platters that actually store data were not warped. They had been gouged and pitted, but the 340-megabyte drive was only half full, and the damage happened where data had not yet been written.

Edwards attributes that to a lucky twist: The computer was running an ancient operating system, DOS, which does not scatter data all over drives as other approaches do. After cleaning the platters with a chemical solution, Edwards used them in a newly built drive. The process — two days from start to finish — captured 99 percent of the drive's information.


more at the link

The captured laptops probably weren't running DOS, but the point is that if one can retrieve information from a disc drive involved in a space shuttle break up, it's not that far fetched to think that data and disc drives could also survive nearby artillery explosions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Its not only about surviving physical damage
its actually more about the tampering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. correct, only a nuke woud have vaporized the material
and nobody is accusing Colombia of dropping a nuke on Ecuador
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flanker Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They were "untouched"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. they were.......
"Interpol addressed Chavez charges that no computer could have survived the bombardment by showing photographs of metal cases that protected them during the raid."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080515/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/colombia_rebel_computers;_ylt=Akn_tvKPbS6ZZw3Te1vMgui3IxIF

got any more pics????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's been described as ten 500 pound "smart bombs" in a small area.
You'd think that woulda scuffed them up a bit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Riiight
And they know because the user name was "Raul Reyes" no doubt.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Now can we discuss Uribes lies?
where are the evidence that everybody else is a member of the FARC except him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Sometimes a partial quote is a lie.
"Other key findings confirm that the Colombian Judicial Police computer forensic experts followed internationally recognized principles in the handling of electronic evidence from the time they received the exhibits on 3 March 2008. However, between 1 and 3 March, direct access to the seized computer exhibits by Colombia's first responder anti-terrorist unit in order to view and download their contents did not follow internationally recognized principles in the handling of electronic evidence under ordinary circumstances. INTERPOL's experts verified that this direct access and downloading had no effect on the content of any of the user files on the eight seized computer exhibits."

So they didn't follow procedure. However, this had no effect on the contents--they merely didn't follow procedure.

But "INTERPOL's report also emphasized that the remit of its technical examination was not to evaluate the accuracy or the source of the exhibits’ content" seems a well-grounded comment. Interpol isn't saying that what the documents say is accurate--they have no where of knowing. They also don't know if the documents' purported source is as indicated, either by the Colombians or the documents themselves--neither hinting there's doubt nor dispelling doubt. Just that the Colombians didn't alter the documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
51. And sometimes, not telling the whole story
gives other posters the chance to do this:

"Using their forensic tools, they (the Interpol experts) found a total of 48,055 files for which the timestamps indicated that they had either been created, accessed, modified or deleted as a result of the direct access to the eight seized exhibits by Colombian authorities between the time of their seizure on 1 March 2008 and 3 March 2008 at 11:45 a.m.



http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42391

"So they didn't follow procedure. However, this had no effect on the contents--they merely didn't follow procedure," huh?

Ouch! You may want to actually consider the whole story before taking someone to task here.

:evilgrin: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the Nobel Prize committee is so political, how political do you imagine
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:31 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
Interpol would be? The notion that it would be politically neutral becomes more ludicrous each day. (No pun on Noble was intended).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Nobel Prize to Henry Kissinger? Whaaaa?
Edited on Thu May-15-08 06:25 PM by Judi Lynn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
53. Al Gore got a peace prize,beating out an old woman for his box office movie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I read INTERPOL I automatically think CORRUPT.
Based on it's own corrupt past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So true. The terms corruption and interpol are interchangeable
No wonder Bush Admin had to go all the way over to the Interpol to find someone to back up his stance on this propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. I know zilch about its corrupt past, but would be surprised if it were not,
to say the least.

At every level of the system, law and order, after all, is defined and dispensed by the power people in furtherance of their own perceived best interests, not the general public's; least of all is it ordained and dispensed by the characteristically virtuous, although of course there are good people in the system, in spite of all. And what a good job that's the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. "...48,055 files...had either been created, accessed, modified or deleted..."
Edited on Fri May-16-08 04:44 AM by Peace Patriot
"Using their forensic tools, they (the Interpol experts) found a total of 48,055 files for which the timestamps indicated that they had either been created, accessed, modified or deleted as a result of the direct access to the eight seized exhibits by Colombian authorities between the time of their seizure on 1 March 2008 and 3 March 2008 at 11:45 a.m.

"The actual seizure of the eight computer exhibits occurred between 5:50 a.m. and 7:50 a.m. (local time at the place of seizure, GMT -5:00) on Saturday, 1 March. However, it was not until more than 48 hours later that the eight seized exhibits were given to the computer forensic specialists of the Colombian Judicial Police," the report goes on to say.

"Access to the data contained in the eight FARC computer exhibits between 1 March 2008, when they were seized by Colombian authorities, and 3 March 2008 at 11:45 a.m., when they were turned over to…the Colombian Judicial Police, did not conform to internationally recognised principles for handling electronic evidence by law enforcement.

"When law enforcement directly accesses seized electronic evidence without first making physical images of the data, such access leaves traces of the relevant law enforcement officer’s accessing and viewing of the evidence.

"Direct access may complicate validating this evidence for purposes of its introduction in a judicial proceeding, because law enforcement is then required to demonstrate or prove that the direct access did not have a material impact on the purpose for which the evidence is intended," the report adds.


(MORE)

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42391

-------

"...48,055 files...created, accessed, modified or deleted..."

Tell me why any files in these computers would be deleted. Therein may lay the key to this bullshit--IF the computers in fact belonged to Raul Reyes. What did Reyes know about Uribe (the Medellin Cartel's go-to guy, in his early career) and his death squad pals? Is it a mere coincidence that, just before this Interpol report was released (with another, "confidential" report for the Colombia government's eyes only, by the way), Uribe extradites a number of his righwing paramilitary accusers to the U.S.--and the Bush Dept. of Justice--on drug trafficking charges (a move to shut them up?)? Prosecutors in Colombia are investigating Uribe on death squad/drug trafficking charges, and over 50 of his political cohorts are under investigation, indicted or in jail for such crimes.

DELETED files. Why? Was there content in the computers that Uribe did not want Interpol (or anyone else) to know?

--------

On another point, this Interpol report has NOTHING WHATEVER to do with the CONTENT of the computer files. They used non-Spanish speakers for the examination!

"...the commission was made up of forensic experts from Australia and Singapore who do not speak or read Spanish, 'which helped to eliminate the possibility that they might be influenced by the content of any data they were examining,' according to the report."

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42391

Of course, that is if you believe this Interpol statement--that they didn't look at the content. They're SPIES, for crissakes. There may be reasons why they were so careful to use non-Spanish speakers --so the actual examiners couldn't make sense of what was created or modified or the CONTEXT of deletions. Another reason could be so that Interpol has deniability about content that indicts Uribe or the corrupt, murderous, drug trafficking people he runs with. Surely Raul Reyes would have had some info and opinions about his criminal adversaries in the Colombian government and military.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. "Tell me why any files in these computers would be deleted."
Are you serious? Why would anyone delete a file? Is that what you are asking?

Are you freaking serious? Is that a serious question?

I am choking on my corn flakes right now. That's freaking hilarious!

You must think Reyes is so fricking perfect that he never EVER has to delete files. EVER.

*choke*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. What about to delete evidences that would implicate Uribes government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Fine!
But don't sit there are wave a red flag because someone found a computer that had FILEDS DELETED!

My God...that is still the funniest thing I have ever read here!

Stop the presses!!! We found DELETED files on a laptop!!! Alert the media!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. "Using their forensic tools
they (the Interpol experts) found a total of 48,055 files for which the timestamps indicated that they had either been created, accessed, modified or deleted as a result of the direct access to the eight seized exhibits by Colombian authorities between the time of their seizure on 1 March 2008 and 3 March 2008 at 11:45 a.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Wouldn't that be evidence of tampering?
Edited on Fri May-16-08 02:05 PM by killbotfactory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #34
52. It certainly would.
And notice how the corporate 'news' sources continue to claim that "it (INTERPOL report) found no evidence of tampering with the computers". This bald faced lie clearly illustrates the degree of collusion between the media owners and the policy making establishment in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankmeCrankme Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. If you read more closely you'll see that the deletions occurred after seizure.
Now do you understand the impact of deleting, modifying or otherwise tampering with the files on the hard drive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunderdog Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. Chavez ridicules anyone who disagrees with him.
And his reference to a "media dictatorship" is priceless. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. A joke perhaps ?
Please elaborate especially on the subject of "media dictatorship" given that Venezualas' media is largely right wing owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Er,
after you have picked yourself up laughing on the floor there by yourself, you may want to actually inform yourself about Venezuelan media ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. When someone is manifestly in the right, although on one level what he is exposing may
be the stuff of nightmares, on another level, he cannot do so without seeming to deride its authors; because the subject matter is, in that aspect, inherently laughable.

Having truth on your side is a major credibility asset, when the falsehood of an attempted rebuttal of it is obvious to a fair-minded person. YOU LOSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
47. It's accurate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. This whole thing stinks to high heaven. The US is instigating
another attempt at ousting Chavez. Will Uribe be stupid enough to be the US puppet in a war against half of South America? Because if Columbia attacks Venezuela, there would be at least half a dozen SA states join with Venezuela against any aggression...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Caught NPR Pushing this BS
Ever since they went more private, I think in 1998, they have really been a dubious source for info. Sad....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. NPR went private in 1998?
Care to elaborate on that carefully researched statement of fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. To You? Why... all you do spread propaganda so now
Edited on Fri May-16-08 12:09 PM by fascisthunter
I have to be straight with the likes of you. I am being straight. Do your own research, neocon...

PS - you been put on ignore. Don't expect any chit chat from me...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. So you've got nothing
to back up your assertion. Figures.

And you've put me on ignore? Boo hoo hoo.

Guess you don't like your juvenile attempts to spread FUD challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
54. thats how fascist hunters operate
caught in a govt funded National Publis Radio lie. NPR still holds those annual public pledge drives......kinda doubt few but the richest foundations donate though ;)

BINGO !
Thats the facists angle on how the evil public radio support is controlled by evil big buisness

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. fascisthunter is not lying.
He said, "Ever since they went more private...", and he is correct.

Revenue gains seen in merger of sales teams

In a bid to bring more corporate underwriting into public broadcasting, NPR and WGBH are birthing a new sales unit to sell a larger and more diverse inventory of options — national, multimarket, local, radio, TV, website and more.

They’ll combine NPR’s national underwriting sales team with a purchase announced Sept. 11 — National Public Broadcasting LLC, a privately owned firm that arranges spot underwriting for national companies on selected stations. The new rep firm’s inventory also will include NPR.org, PBS.org and websites of dozens of stations.


<http://www.current.org/funding/funding0717npb.shtml>


Slate, NPR Partnership Could Be More Big Media Than Public Radio

When National Public Radio announced a deal to co-produce a new radio show, "Day to Day," with Slate.com, NPR called it an "historic collaboration." This would be the first time in its 33-year history that NPR co-produced a show with another commercial media enterprise. While online media fans may find comfort in one of its own scoring such a prestigious show with NPR, media watchdogs could be concerned.

The problem? NPR's deal with a Microsoft-owned publication brings up possible conflicts on Microsoft coverage (or lack thereof), as do the funding of NPR by Microsoft and by Chairman Bill Gates' charitable foundation. Plus, the NPR-Slate partnership is far more than just a radio show. The non-profit and for-profit entities will combine to offer cross-media advertisements and underwriting in the future, a deal that smells much more like Big Media than public radio.


<http://www.ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1054676989.php>


It takes no more than a few minutes worth of effort before you call someone a liar and make fool of yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. ahhhhh... that Felt Good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. So where's the beef?
Private = public only to brain dead Republicans.

Are you insinuating that NPR is controlled by private corporations promoting their agendas because it accepts corporate funding?

Oh, I forgot. You've got me on ignore. BTW, that's the root of the word ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. I'm Sorry... did somebody say something?
awwwwww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Gotcha
You either lied about putting me on ignore, or can't figure out how to use the ignore function.

Both are probably true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpikeTss Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
48. About the laughable 'NPR news'

Do you have seen this clip? You're definitely not alone with your thoughts about them:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uLaP_-KXPDY

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. At least IHT was nice enough to remove the abusive language.
Chavez: ' "Este señor Noble, que es innoble, es un policía gringo, un policía corrupto, inmoral que aplaude a unos asesinos... Es un vagabundo internacional, creo que tenemos que revisar la Interpol, qué es eso, si vale la pena estar ahí. Aquí somos gente seria", señaló en una rueda de prensa en la que dijo que respondía al "show de la Interpol con otro show".'

"This Mr. Noble--who's innoble--is a gringo cop, a corrupt cop, an immoral person who applauds killers.... He's an international vagabond; I think we have to review Interpol, what it is, if it's worth the bother of keeping it. We're serious people here," he said at a press conference at which he said he was answering the "Interpol show with another show".

Granted the pun is puerile, but still it achieves its speaker's usual lofty standards.

Yeah, I know that some will probably argue that "gringo" is a term of affection--just like "innoble", "corrupt" and "immoral" are compliments. But it draws group boundaries nicely. 'You're Latinos, my people--what are you doing even believing what an outsider, this gringo, says about one of your own?' Eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. Gringo in that context is most certainly not a term of affection
Edited on Sat May-17-08 12:55 AM by sfexpat2000
but more a fingering of a culprit. Most people in Latin America know that US policy has not been their friend. And Venezuelans know it more immediately since the attempted, CIA backed coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
44. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. Mickey Chavez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Hey, Curious George is also a trademark infringement





;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. So, let me get this straight...
The Miracle Laptop (doubly so - made it through the bombs and the devastation unscathed, and was fortuitously discovered by the Columbia soldiers, who were of course much too busy shooting people in the head to plant anything) was not tampered with. Oh, well - that explains everything! What brand of laptop? Must have been a good one.

Thank goodness for the mainstream media! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
57. Even if they contents of the laptop are real (which is doubtful)...
Colombia is still lying about what the documents actually say. They've been caught red-handed in three lies about these documents already, and it looks like they are making more false claims this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
58. Excellent observations made in a post by DU'er magbana:
REBELION: INTERPOL REPORT confirms computers WERE manipulated! And the press is manipulating us.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=405x4331
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. A very good read.
Latin American history professor Greg Grandin goes further. He believes "Almost all of Latin America and most of the world would take Venezuela's side in this dispute. Any move (against the Chavez government) would further isolate the United States in a region where it has been hemorrhaging influence."


Heh heh heh. They know what's up. They aren't fooled by the crude American propaganda-for-simpletons.

I was reading the thread about the violation of Venezuelan airspace. I noticed the Uribe butt muncher's rusty gears were turning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. Here's more on that same subject, which also mentions Greg Grandin!
Spinning the News - The FARC-EP Files, Venezuela and Interpol

by Stephen Lendman

Global Research, May 19, 2008

First some background. On March 1, the Colombian military (with US Special Forces help) illegally attacked a FARC-EP rebel camp inside Ecuador. US satellite telephone tracking located the site. Washington signed off on the mission. Over 20 people were killed, including 16 or more FARC-EP members while they slept. Key among them was Paul Reyes, the FARC-EP's second-in-command, key peace negotiator and public voice, and lead figure in the Chavez-led hostage negotiations with Colombia.

The action was a clear act of aggression and premeditated murder. It's not how the dominant media played it. Hostile verbal exchanges took place between Hugo Chavez and Ecuador's Raphael Correa on the one hand and Colombia's Alvaro Uribe and George Bush on the other. US presidential candidates, as expected, supported the White House and Bogota.

Tensions heightened further when Colombia's vice-president, Francisco Santos Calderon, revealed his nation's army recovered three laptops and other material at the FARC-EP camp with provocative evidence on their hard drives. He claimed it showed Chavez and Correa have links to the FARC-EP, and Venezuela provided weapons, munitions, and $300 million or so to the rebel group. In addition, the FARC-EP was accused of acquiring 50 kilograms (110 pounds) of uranium, that it wishes to sell it for a radioactive dirty bomb, it also sold 700 kilograms of cocaine for about $1.5 million, and more.

The story is preposterous, but the media grabbed hold of it. No evidence exists, so they invent it. In March, Colombian authorities asked Interpol to examine the computer files for authenticity. The organization released its report on May 15. On its web site, it states that Secretary General Ronald Noble "advised senior Colombian law enforcement officials that INTERPOL's team of forensic experts discovered 'no evidence of modification, alteration, addition or deletion' in the user files of any of the three laptop computers, three USB thumb drives and two external hard disks seized during a Colombian anti-narcotics and anti-terrorist operation on a FARC camp on 1 March 2008."

More:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9016

Thanks, ronnie624.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC