Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Obama 17: Superdelegates Waiting in the Wings to Put IL Senator Over the Top

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:47 AM
Original message
The Obama 17: Superdelegates Waiting in the Wings to Put IL Senator Over the Top
Edited on Mon May-26-08 10:48 AM by oldpol
Source: Barron's

The Obama 17: Superdelegates in the Wings
By JIM MCTAGUE
THE ROAD TO VICTORY FOR DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL Hillary Clinton is straight out of a nightmare: It keeps getting steeper and steeper the closer she gets to the end. By late next week, it may become obvious even to her that she'd have a better chance at winning the Power Ball lottery than pulling out a cigar room filled backroom victory against Barack Obama.

A highly placed Democratic Party source we've dealt with for many years tells us that Obama over the next several weeks will announce support from as many as 17 superdelegates, bringing his total delegate count from the current 1,965 to 1,982. This means that he need win only 40% of the 110 pledged delegates up for grabs in primaries in Puerto Rico, Montana and South Dakota to secure the nomination. Obama-campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor said it sounded as though our source was guessing; our source says he got his information from the Obama campaign. We add that the number does not include 17 delegates won in early primaries by former candidate John Edwards, who recently jumped on the Obama bandwagon.

Clinton's strategy is to win most of the 111 delegates and then persuade 201 currently uncommitted superdelegates to support her. She argues that she would have a less difficult time defeating Republican John McCain in November because she's won primaries in key swing states, like Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Primaries in Florida and Michigan did not count because the states violated party rules. Clinton hopes to persuade her party's rules committee on May 31 to seat delegates from those states anyway so as not to disfranchise their voters. She received the most votes in those unofficial primaries. Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan.


Read more: http://online.barrons.com/article/SB121158302459818657.html?mod=googlenews_barrons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spouting Horn Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Turn out the lights
the party's over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodrigo2xxx Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is exactly what she was looking for ... divide and conquer
She will do whatever possible to appear as a victim. Therefore the party has no longer legitimacy to impeach her for being a candidate and then, she can be a candidate without the party's support ... the perfect hold up ...
But, se already made mistakes all along the course of these primaries, another wrong idea ... by the clintons ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link is pretty much useless
You can't read the rest of the article unless you're a subscriber.


BTW I used to work with the writer of the article at a small NJ paper back in the mid-1970s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Have you not heard of BugMeNot?
http://www.bugmenot.com can get you in to most any site on the net. It's a nifty tool!

But, you din't miss much. The rest of the article:

Simon Rosenberg, president of NDN, which describes itself as a "progressive think tank," predicts the party will seat part of the Michigan and Florida delegations, not all of them. Democratic officials in other states want them punished for bad behavior, he says. Rosenberg, who was a member of Bill Clinton's campaign staff in 1992, says he believes Hillary is hanging on because "she believes she's the better candidate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're welcome
I love that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Thanks, Pastiche
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. You're welcome
Don't forget to bookmark the URL! It does come in handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another I-Hate-Hillary screed posted OUTSIDE of GD-P
:eyes:

Take it back to the funny farm.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Where in that post does it say anything about hating Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katerinasmommy Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Anything except saying Hillary will win...
is Hillary hating according to some it seems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. waiting? waiting for what, for goodness sake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. self deleted.
Edited on Mon May-26-08 03:49 PM by robinlynne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. the person in charge of the Puerto Rican election? Connie McCormack.
The same Connie who was charged with election fruad in Texas, then sent to "privatize" our Los Angeles elections, which she did. We are almost entirely run by Diebold and Diebold partners now. So, don't be surprised when.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. No time like the present.
If they wait much longer, we'll have to argue about why we wore tie-dyed tee shirts and "Jesus boots" all over again like we did with our parents 40 years ago!!

C'mon already!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey, Barrons. He gets 17 a WEEK!
17 over the next few weeks. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Someone remind me again what the fuck they are waiting for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC