Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China's first home-made jet flies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Doctor Cynic Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 09:46 PM
Original message
China's first home-made jet flies
Source: BBC

China successfully flight tested its first home-grown commercial airliner.

The ARJ-21's maiden flight lasted one hour and the aircraft did not rise above 900 metres in altitude due to safety reasons.

The 90-seat jet flew out of a local Shanghai airport and its manufacturer expects it to fly distances up to 3,700km.

Each jet will cost $27m (£22.6m) and first deliveries are expected to take place within 18 months.

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7755377.stm



Lemme guess...so how long before a plane crashes due to excessive lead content on the fuselage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. American airplane manufacturers have been manufacturing parts and subsystems in China for years.
This includes airliners and military airplane parts and systems.

Parts and subsystems for Cessna's new light sport airplane, the SkyCatcher, are being manufactured in China.

Chinese technology? Homegrown? American aviation companies, electronics companies, and others are selling the technology to China in return for opening up new markets for these companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksimons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. good for them, if they can do it, let them go for it


I wonder if they'll have the learning curve in about 20 years on what goes wrong with planes after 5-10 years and then will be a valid manufacturer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. if you want to steal a plane to copy.. dont copy an MD-80
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 10:22 PM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. you have no idea how much this will further hurt the US economy
Good for them?! Uh?

One of the few things we export is our aircraft. Honey, we can't continue to sell each other insurance.
Oh, but we have the film industry, I forgot. :yoiks:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's reverse-engineering
It's how Japan beat our ass in TV, electronics, cameras, cars, etc. Just build it better, like Toyota's, and steal the market away. China will probably kiss off Boeing in 20 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No....they....won't....
...they will produce an inferior product compared to Boeing because they simply lack the sophistication of close to 100 years of aircraft manufacturing. The planes will be sold to the likes of India, Pakistan and the emerging countries of Southeast Asia, but they will only fly domestically in those countries and they will never fly into Europe or the Americas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonEBrook Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. You're mistaken...because 100 years of 'sophistication' can be implemented
instantaneously by manufacturers. I will bet you they get an FAA type certificate within a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Not likely.....
....and even if they do, ALPA will scream bloody murder before putting its members on board these aircraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Even selling to those markets would hurt Boeing.
Those secondary markets are typically the purchasers of secondhand aircraft sold by the major airlines. Those airlines factor those resale values into their profitability projections when purchasing new planes. If the secondary sales market dries up, the major buyers of new planes will be reluctant to purchase as many planes, or may demand that the major western airline manufacturers reduce their prices in response to the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
29. I agree
Did you read this in the article?

>>>The Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China say they have secured over 200 orders and last month gained five firm orders from GE Commercial Aviation Services who have an option for a further 20 jets.<<<

What the heck? GE?

You're right about domestic flights:

>>>It's general manager Jin Zhuanglong said: "With less fuel consumption and longer flight hours, the ARJ-21 will reduce air fares by 8% to 10% for Chinese airlines, most of whom currently use large aircraft above 140 seats on short and medium routes." <<<



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The Japanese actually reverse-engineered...
cars like Mercedes and BMW. But the Japanese pulled this off because their goal was quality. China's only goal will be cheap production. Expect these planes to fall out of the air with frequency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. China can and does produce many high quality products.
It's a misconception that all production is ultra-efficiency geared without respect to quality. Military products, for instance, are good quality. It's products in the "tertiary" (consumer) sphere that are prioritized lower in the struggle for national resources. I expect these jets will be good quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. That is VERY true.
Granted, I've been guilty of making silly jokes, though I don't put up grossly politically incorrect racist pictures for others not to respond to because it's more fun to be a perceived sexist...

What was I talking about?

Oh yes. Not all products from China are bad and should not be. People should indeed be wary once a string of related problems occurs, and as the recalled products and such are from specific venues rather than everything being produced...

Still, if production is what defines an economy to free trade with, we should be making more at home than liquid soap and plastic drinking cups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Cheap
was a key note feature of things 'made in Japan' up till the late 60s early 70s. They made nothing but low cost junk like a lot of the stuff we see from China today. IMO that the Chinese will continue to improve the quality of their manufactured items. At some time in the future, they will equal the Japanese or our manufactured goods in quality. It takes time and time is on the Chinese side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. it isn't reverse engineered - we sold them the whole works
see my post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. "did not rise above 900 metres in altitude due to safety reasons"?
That makes no sense. The closer one is to the ground the less time the crew has to recover from any difficulty. No sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's because the planes are made from bamboo
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Test flights are very incremental
You don't go straight to cruising altitude, or anything like it. You start at the lower ends of its performance, you use short, low flights to put more cockpit time per flight into seeing how the plane handles during takeoffs and landings, etc., and you start going beyond those into normal flights, building up data on how the plane operates as you do so.

It makes perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'll pass thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. This plane is a McDonnell Douglas DC-9 "NG"
McDonnell Douglas sold the Chinese a complete DC-9 assembly line to build the MD-80 and MD-90, after the merger with Boeing the venture in China fell apart and the Chinese diverted the equipment to other purposes after having only built a few planes.

This thing is a DC-9NG or 717 if you wish - and the Chinese didn't steal it, we sold it to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. "NG" - abbreviation for "No Go"? Like the Chevy Nova in Mexico or Spain,
NG won't sell in America.

Why the arcane reference?

Because "Nova", as pronounced, translates to "No go" in Spanish. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Next Generation....
.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. Holy Fuck!!!!
Are stupid or what?!




'Tis a 'pretty little' plane....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hope they used up as much of their melamine supply as possible.
Edited on Tue Dec-02-08 06:31 AM by Jamastiene
I'm sick of hearing about their melamine supply poisoning animals and small children.

And while we are on the topic of China, it's NOT an addiction. It's a lifeline. Got that, China? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. What isn't 'an addiction'? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, it can't be made out of lead...
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. hahaha, you never know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. Lovely lead paint finish....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Good. Now the government needs to stop subsidies to Boeing, and make them "compete"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scisyhp1 Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
31. That should say "first home-made passanger jet".
They've been flying home-made fighter-jets for a while now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC