Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State board will count missing Minneapolis ballots in Coleman-Franken Senate race (Updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 11:55 AM
Original message
State board will count missing Minneapolis ballots in Coleman-Franken Senate race (Updated)
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 12:10 PM by MN Against Bush
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press

The state Canvassing Board has voted to count 133 missing ballots from a Dinkytown precinct, despite the objections of Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman.

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson told the board this morning that the ballots could be included, the second big victory for Democratic challenger Al Franken in his effort to unseat Coleman. "I believe there is authority ... to include the election night returns," Swanson said. The board seemed more than willing to accept the results, despite a 2002 case cited by Coleman where a court threw out 17 ballots that were tossed in a fireplace during a statewide recount.

snip

A separate but crucial opinion from Swanson's office says improperly rejected absentee ballots can be counted as part of a statewide recount. There are 638 of those ballots thus far identified by local elections officials in 49 of Minnesota's 87 counties.

Franken has argued that all properly cast ballots be counted, even if they weren't included in Election Day totals because of an election judge error. Coleman has objected to the counting of improperly rejected absentee ballots, saying they should be dealt with in an election challenge overseen by a court. Coleman held a 215-vote lead over Franken prior to a statewide hand recount getting underway. Just who is ahead at this point is unclear because the candidates challenged the validity of 6,655 ballots. More than 2,000 of those challenges have been withdrawn.

Read more: http://www.twincities.com/ci_11205362?nclick_check=1



State official: Wrongfully rejected absentee ballots could total nearly 1,600

By PAUL WALSH and BOB VON STERNBERG, Star Tribune Staff Writers

Last update: December 12, 2008 - 11:02 AM


Several hundred absentee ballots have been wrongfully rejected in the Nov. 4 election and that total could more than double by the time all Minnesota counties turn in their reviews, the secretary of state's office told a panel charged with overseeing the recount in the overtime U.S. Senate contest between Republican incumbent Norm Coleman and Democratic rival Al Franken this morning.

The state Canvassing Board is methodically pushing Minnesota another step closer toward deciding who it elected last month to the Senate.

The board was told this morning that 49 of the state's 87 counties have examined 4,823 rejected absentee ballots and 638 of those were determined by local officials to have been wrongfully rejected.

Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann also reported that if that trend holds -- with more than 13 percent of the rejected absentee ballots tossed improperly -- there would end up being nearly 1,600 wrongfully set aside.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/36043514.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUs

While it looks like this will be going to court there is no doubt that this was a great day for Franken, and it is going to make it a lot more difficult for Coleman to disenfranchise the voters who legally cast ballots on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't care who the people vote for
If somebody casts a discernible vote it should be counted. Period. Republicans are always trying to disenfranchise voters, let people vote, it's our right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, the Senate gets the last word on this according to the
Constitution. No matter what a court may decide, the authority to judge the elections of senators and the qualifications of senators is vested in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If it goes to the Senate...
If the Senate were to intervene then you are right, but I don't think the Senate will intervene unless it becomes an absolute necessity. If there are counties that refuse to count their wrongfully rejected absentee ballots then I could see the Senate order that they be counted, but that is as far as I see the Senate going. They don't want to make it appear as if the candidate was chosen by politicians rather than the voters, so I think they will be very hesitant to get involved in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I agree. They will not select the candidate. They may, however,
judge the election. The Constitution gives them that right without conditions. Therefore a court should under the Constitution recuse itself and allow the Senate to decide -- the procedures for counting the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. A judge can overrule the senate if it's deemed unconstitutional.
Separation of powers and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the update. It's good to hope a Democrat might take Wellstone's chair. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. So Rove ordered, "Let in be done in some small 'dinkytown',
where no one will notice or suspect." :rofl:

Thank the heavens for those that diligently watch. :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Dinkytown" is a neighborhood area in Minneapolis that is encompasses the U of M.
It's a very progressive area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Hi Myrna! I realize it's a suburb, just made a very bad 'pun'.
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dinky town on one side of the U of M, Stadium Village on the other
You can almost take it to the bank, these were Franken votes. Is Vescios still in Dinkytown? (Any twin citians passing through?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. It's been a little while since I passed through Dinkytown, but I'll keep
my eyes open for Vescio's. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks!!... Vescios is a place my hubby and I used to go all the time
back in the day. Valli Pizza next door(which I know has been gone for years) was where we went on our first date. But Vescios kept hanging in there. Live in Iowa now, so if Vesicos is still up and running, time for a road trip!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. There is no guessing about it. The missing ballots broke for Franken by 46 votes.
Since they were already counted, they know EXACTLY how many votes each candidate received.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Excellent!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC