Source:
The Guardian (UK)Fortisgate, the growing scandal over the future of Belgian rump insurer Fortis, brought down the country's government soon after the justice minister resigned over suspected state meddling in legal decisions.
Jo Vandeurzen stood down after the court of cassation, Belgium's supreme court, said it had found "significant signs" but no hard evidence that the government had tried to influence judges ruling on the bail-out and sale of Fortis.
Within hours, prime minister Yves Leterme won a cabinet vote that the government should resign. King Albert now has to decide whether to accept the resignation.
Observers said the likely outcome would be a general election, an option few parties want amid deepening economic crisis.
Read more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/20/belgium-europe
So the economic crisis claims it's first government - mine.
I chose this article as it's headline is most accurate, but more background can be found in this Times article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5371351.ece"Fortis was hastily dismantled in October as its shares nose-dived, with the Dutch state taking over its Dutch banking and insurance assets and the Belgian government taking over its Belgian banking business. In an attempt to secure the long-term viability of Fortis and the Belgian banking system, Mr Leterme orchestrated the sale of most of the group's Belgian assets to BNP Paribas."
BNP Paribas being FRENCH - the majority of Fortis was sold out to BNP at a knockdown price, you wouldn't say from this article.
Fortis, the world's second largest bank, was dismantled in two weekend sessions, where both the shareholder input and democratic input were not sought. This already disturbed me and many belgians. Then, the court rules in favour of freezing the deal, giving time for shareholders to ratify, modify or nullify the deal. I saw this as a victory over the backroom weekend dealings.
We have now learned that upon receiving news of the court's ruling (PRIOR to the ruling), the government sought to influence the outcome in a multitude of ways. Once again, outcry as this is a blatant violation of separation between executive and judicial branches.
And so the government fell, it's position untenable and the it's confidence lost.
So when the rights of shareholders were ignored, the court system worked. When the separation of powers was in dire straits, the court system worked. Sadly, the end result will likely be an increase in political power of both the extreme right (Vlaams Belang) and a person-centered rightwing liberal party (LDD).
regards
bmc
(socialist, flemish, green)
PS: this entire charade has to be seen in the light of divisions between the dutch and french speaking parts of Belgium - but that is actually to idiotic to try and explain. Just important to consider Leterme's government was held hostage by the Walloon (french-speaking) political parties.