Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Hears Justice for Sale Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:13 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Hears Justice for Sale Case
Source: ABC


West Virginia Case Called One of the Most "Extreme" Bias Cases to Come Before the Supreme Court
By MADDY SAUER and JUSTIN ROOD
March 3, 2009—


A multi-million dollar advertising campaign waged by a controversial mining executive to elect a West Virginia Supreme Court judge to preside over cases his company had before the court may push the U.S. Supreme Court to act. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday called the case one of the most "extreme" of its kind that the high court has ever considered. The situation fit Justice Potter Stuart's infamous definition of obscenity, Stevens said, "I know it when I see it."


The case, an appeal by a small West Virginia mining company, has focused a spotlight on the issue of money and influence in judicial elections.


Don Blankenship, president and CEO of the massive Massey Energy, won successive court appeals in the West Virginia Supreme Court after a jury verdict awarded $50 million to a competitor that claimed Massey had run the smaller mining company out of business. Harman Mining accused Massey of defaulting on contracts and committing fraud.


After Harman won the $50 million verdict in trial court, Massey appealed to the West Virginia Supreme Court. Shortly after, their CEO Blankenship helped to raise a $3.5 million advertising war chest that led to the defeat of one of the Supreme Court justices. The winning candidate in that election was Justice Brent Benjamin who later voted in favor of Massey when Harman's appeal came before the court.


When an ABC News producer caught up with Blankenship last spring to ask him about his financial support of Benjamin, he grabbed the producer's shirt and camera and told him he was "liable to get shot."



Read more: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/ConductUnbecoming/story?id=6998390&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anybody else read John Grisham's "The Appeal"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Staph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A year ago, when the book was released,
Grisham was interviewed on the Today Show. When asked if the plot of the book was far-fetched, he said, "It's already happened. It happened a few years ago in West Virginia. A guy owned a coal company. He got tired of being sued. He elected his guy to the Supreme Court. It switched ... back his way. Now he doesn't worry about getting sued."

This has been big news here in West Virginia since the election in 2004. Benjamin did get elected, but in the 2006 election, Don Blankenship (owner of Massey Coal) spent more millions to get Republicans elected to the state House and Senate. Four of his incumbents lost and none of his challengers won. He won't influence politics here again.

But that doesn't solve the problem of Justice Benjamin. Our Supreme Court has 12-year terms. We're stuck with him and his bias until January of 2017.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 2 of the 7 members of the WI SC are creatures of a lobby group
named Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce (WMC). They poured millions in to pur a conservative face on our SC, with results athat are already proving disastrous for consumers and small litigants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes.
This book needs to be publicized again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet Bob Kincaid is going to talk about this tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. But what's the correct response?
This case is not about direct campaign contributions to Justice Benjamin's campaign, but money spent by a private individual or group that benefitted Benjamin.

Surely the solution can't be to decree that private expenditures of money on political issues may be banned. How would that be in line with the First Amendment?

(Note to the ABC "reporters" who wrote this story: the storied justice who wrote the famous line, "I know it when I see it," was Justice Potter Stewart, not Stuart. Idiots.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVRICK13 Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I Keep Telling You
Louisiana sends their politicians to West Virginia to learn corruption. I also keep telling you we are a third world nation. Rape the land, abuse the people and control the government all for political gain and cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. I was going to post this

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC