Source:
ABCWest Virginia Case Called One of the Most "Extreme" Bias Cases to Come Before the Supreme Court
By MADDY SAUER and JUSTIN ROOD
March 3, 2009—
A multi-million dollar advertising campaign waged by a controversial mining executive to elect a West Virginia Supreme Court judge to preside over cases his company had before the court may push the U.S. Supreme Court to act. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday called the case one of the most "extreme" of its kind that the high court has ever considered. The situation fit Justice Potter Stuart's infamous definition of obscenity, Stevens said, "I know it when I see it."
The case, an appeal by a small West Virginia mining company, has focused a spotlight on the issue of money and influence in judicial elections.
Don Blankenship, president and CEO of the massive Massey Energy, won successive court appeals in the West Virginia Supreme Court after a jury verdict awarded $50 million to a competitor that claimed Massey had run the smaller mining company out of business. Harman Mining accused Massey of defaulting on contracts and committing fraud.
After Harman won the $50 million verdict in trial court, Massey appealed to the West Virginia Supreme Court. Shortly after, their CEO Blankenship helped to raise a $3.5 million advertising war chest that led to the defeat of one of the Supreme Court justices. The winning candidate in that election was Justice Brent Benjamin who later voted in favor of Massey when Harman's appeal came before the court.
When an ABC News producer caught up with Blankenship last spring to ask him about his financial support of Benjamin, he grabbed the producer's shirt and camera and told him he was "liable to get shot."
Read more:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/ConductUnbecoming/story?id=6998390&page=1