Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court rejects limits on drug lawsuits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:29 AM
Original message
Supreme Court rejects limits on drug lawsuits
Source: Washington Post

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a $6.7 million jury award to a musician who lost her arm because of a botched injection of an anti-nausea medication. The court brushed away a plea that it limit lawsuits against drug makers.

In a 6-3 decision, the court rejected Wyeth Pharmaceuticals' claim that federal approval of its Phenergan anti-nausea drug should have shielded the company from lawsuits like the one filed by Diana Levine of Vermont.

The decision is the second this term to reject business groups' arguments that federal regulation effectively pre-empts consumer complaints under state law.

A Vermont jury agreed with Levine's claim that Wyeth failed to provide a strong and clear warning about the risks of quickly injecting the drug into a vein. Gangrene is likely if the injection accidentally hits an artery _ precisely what happened to Levine.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/04/AR2009030401407.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dialing back on corporate power
Great news! K&R! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Stevens wrote the majority opinion.
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 10:47 AM by blueclown
Thomas and Breyer wrote seperate concurring opinions. Alito wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Roberts and Scalia.

I am surprised that Justice Thomas wrote an opinion in favor of the victim. I'll have to read his opinion later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow...thanks for the vote record
I was looking online for it. I really thought this would be a 5-4 vote with Thomas dissenting. I KNEW who those other three Nazis were dissenting without even looking it up.

Talk about legislating from the bench. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rec'd. Nice to see big pharm not always winning. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Stunned! Stunned I tells ya
I need a fainting smilie

<--- mine died
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byeya Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. In spite of this decision, we still need to expand the court to 11
and have a special counsel begin investigating what are, to many, the conflicts of interest of Scalia and Thomas in the immediate aftermath of the 2000 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC