Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wolfram Research’s new product Alpha to compete with Google and Wikipedia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 03:59 PM
Original message
Wolfram Research’s new product Alpha to compete with Google and Wikipedia
Source: Wikinews

Wolfram Research Inc., makers of Mathematica and A New Kind of Science, have released a limited alpha of their new web service Wolfram Alpha. Wolfram Alpha is described by Stephen Wolfram (CEO of Wolfram Research Inc.) as a “computational knowledge engine”. Unlike Google, Yahoo and other traditional web search engines that rely on statistical methods for retrieving online documents, Wolfram Alpha answers factual questions in the way that Wikipedia does, except it relies on analytical methods instead of human-generated documents.

Although the product is still in a limited release some details about its operation and design have been revealed by Wolfram on his blog, and by Nova Spivack who recently interviewed Wolfram about Wolfram Alpha. The product is available on the Web as a single search box reminiscent of Google’s main search page. The search queries can be entered in natural language and the natural language system will parse the query and use models of knowledge (ontologies) and human-curated data to return an answer including graphs and other representations. The ontologies and data are managed by Wolfram employees who must input new ontologies and data by hand or, occasionally, with the assistance of programmatic tools. It is expected that an Application Programming Interface (API) will eventually be available, although it is not known what the API will be used for.

Unlike traditional search engines Wolfram Alpha does not search online documents, and thus does not return answers to “fuzzy” questions, such as opinion or advice. Instead, the scope of answers is limited to the knowledge that has already been modeled and encoded in the ontologies and the associated data. In this way the system can generate knowledge that was previously unknown. It is thought that while Wolfram will concentrate on scientific and technical information the system may eventually be able to answer questions in other domains, such as stock information, geography and history. In theory, any question with a factual answer can be answered by Wolfram Alpha.

Read more: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wolfram_Research%E2%80%99s_new_product_Alpha_to_compete_with_Google_and_Wikipedia?curid=122154
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eggplant Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like what we were doing in the late 90s
at a company called Intelligenesis. More can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Goertzel

The idea that Wolfram employees have to manually teach the system is the absurd part. We were spidering the web and doing natural language parsing to absorb our data way back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You need humans
Edited on Mon Mar-09-09 04:59 PM by bananas
If you were trying to do it without humans, you were doomed to failure.

edit to add: I think it was von Neumann who first realized this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Will it dream when they turn it off? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If Wolfram employees input some dreams. lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ...Of electric sheep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like Google searches as they are
If you do an intelligent search, you get the links you need. The key is using the "inurl" (if you're looking for something specific) or judicious use of the "-" to EXCLUDE terms you don't want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. It'll be nice to get actual data on certain issues that have been google bombed
or simply spun and twisted to the point of absolute frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC