Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congresswoman With Ties to Bank Helped Seek Funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:38 PM
Original message
Congresswoman With Ties to Bank Helped Seek Funds
Source: NYT

WASHINGTON — Top banking regulators were taken aback late last year when a California congresswoman helped set up a meeting in which the chief executive of a bank with financial ties to her family asked them for up to $50 million in special bailout funds, Treasury officials said.

Representative Maxine Waters, Democrat of California, requested the September meeting on behalf of executives at OneUnited, one of the nation’s largest black-owned banks. Ms. Water’s husband, Sidney Williams, had served on the bank’s board of directors until early last year and has owned at least $250,000 in stock in the institution. Treasury officials said the session with nearly a dozen senior banking regulators had been intended to allow minority-owned banks and their trade association to discuss the losses they had incurred from the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But Kevin Cohee, OneUnited’s chief executive, instead seized the opportunity to plead for special assistance for his bank, federal officials said.

...Ms. Waters declined on Tuesday to comment on the meeting, or to say if her husband still owns OneUnited shares. Her staff released two letters that showed the meeting was initially called to discuss industry concerns broadly, not matters related just to OneUnited.

The congresswoman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, did not disclose her ties to OneUnited to Treasury officials, who said they learned of them only later.

...While OneUnited did not get the $50 million it requested, the bank did become among the first minority-owned institutions to receive a cash infusion — $12 million — in December through the Treasury’s bank bailout effort, called the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The aid surprised some bank analysts because the bailout was intended for healthy banks, and OneUnited was then considered to be in precarious condition. In addition, it had been harshly criticized by regulators in 2007 for failing to give a sufficient number of loans to lower income residents in Miami, while favoring wealthier customers there. And the F.D.I.C. sanctioned the institution in October 2008 for “unsafe or unsound banking practices,” including excessive compensation for Mr. Cohee. The bank had provided him with a 2008 Porsche SUV and maintained his $6.4 million beachfront compound in Santa Monica. Calif., with views of the Pacific and a spa and pool.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/13/us/politics/13waters.html?hp



More from LA Weekly: The WSJ quotes financial-services committee chair Barney Frank as urging Waters to "stay out of it" when he was trying to assist OneUnited last year. Waters' intercession on behalf of OneUnited at various points in its history has not been unappreciated: According to the NYT, bank executives have contributed $12,500 to Waters' election campaigns.

Against the larger mural of mega-bank failures and investment-house failures, the matter of OneUnited and its L.A. congressional advocate probably amounts to a mere footnote. However, Waters' open intervention on behalf of the bank, along with her racializing the debate over the banking system (she has referred to at least one large lending institution as a "white bank") can only harm the cause of both minority-owned banks and of banking reform in general. Does she really want the public to view OneUnited as the King-Drew of lending institutions?


http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/maxine-in-hot-waters-over-bank/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Greed knows no party....
Hard to figure out who the good guys are these days. Kucinich is probably one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Greed knows certain Parties and parties a lot better than others, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I wouldn't say that...
Congress is pretty evenly split as far as their millionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. And? You're not implying that only the greedy become millionaires, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Belial Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. It will be soon forgotten..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well she is a Democrat,
this should be interesting. Only Republicans can do that and get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. THIS is why term limits are appropriate...the longer one is in the government
the more power they accrue..of course the argument is that the long term staff would become more powerful than the reps/senators... but I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed
3 terms in the Senate, 9 in the House should be sufficient for any public servant to gain and keep experince and seniority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Would you like to see Sen. Kennedy with a Term Limit?
Think of all he's accomplished because of his tenure and influence. I'm just saying - there are two sides to everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. How Is It They Can Find One Democrat
But when the S&L went down, nobody was fingered except the Keating 5, and Neil Bush still walks free, and....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Wasn't John McCain revealed to have been involved with the Keating 5?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes, He Was
and it didn't make any difference, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True. I also know that McCain was deeper involved in the S&L mess than what Rep. Waters is accused
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 05:09 PM by 4lbs
of with this bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. The MSM smearing an African American progressive
what else is new? I'm extremely skeptical of the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackywaggin Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hang em' high!!

Along with Bernie Madoff and his clan if they are found guilty, Democrat or Republican!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What's progressive about kickbacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. About as progressive as the slots in Reno, if true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that's just it, we don't know that it's true. Funny how with all the
criminality in the financial system, they singled out a small minority owned bank for special attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sounds like the story came out of Treasury
...rather than any work by NYT. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. An ex-Treasury official is quoted, so we can safely assume the Republicans are pushing this story
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 04:41 PM by BeyondGeography
to smear liberal Democrats, black Americans, to discredit all things governmental and bailout related. It will soon take its place at the center of the echo chamber, there to inflame the anti-gubmint, intolerant masses.

Problem is, Waters handed them the material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. She needs to step down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dehaiti Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. No Surprise
Another nail in her political coffin. I lost respect for her when she became a lobbyist for the narco-dictator Aristide in Haiti. She's an embarrassment. We should hold her and all Democrats to high standards, lest we be perceived as hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. High Standards: something the GoP would absolutely refuse to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I agree, I think, but I doubt she will. If not, she needs to be "primaried." Then again, I
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 06:58 AM by No Elephants
wonder how much worse she is than other Reps.

Is there any indication that she helped this bank only because her husband had stock in it? Did she vote against any other banks, or did she vote for all of them? Wouldn't Frank have helped this bank anyway? And so on.


Congress acts on almost everything in America. In a long career, there are going to be issues that look like conflicts of interest.

I'm torn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermeerLives Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. Maxine Waters
Waters also adamantely and denied there was anything wrong with Fannie and Freddie during Congressional hearings back in, I think, 2004. C-Span coverage of the hearings is available to see her (and others') denials. IMO, she's part of the problem in the whole mortgage meltdown, which could have been almost entirely prevented, IMO. Instead, she supported those bad policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC