Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After Cancer, Lawmaker Urges Tests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:54 AM
Original message
After Cancer, Lawmaker Urges Tests
Source: Washington Post

By Richard Leiby
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 24, 2009; C01

She didn't cry on "Good Morning America." She didn't cry when she talked to the local press. But yesterday, surrounded by a sisterhood of other breast cancer survivors, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz stood looking so vulnerable and human -- so unlike a typical member of Congress -- at a lectern in a small Capitol dining room, and broke down repeatedly. How could she not? She was telling a roomful of reporters and other strangers about having her breasts and ovaries removed. It's a remarkable story that hardly anyone in Washington knew about until a few days ago.

(snip)

Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), a rising star in her party, was there to announce legislation for a national campaign to educate the public, particularly young women and their doctors, about the need for a much earlier approach to breast cancer detection. The accepted standard of mammograms at age 40, advocacy groups say, creates a false sense of security for younger women. Other cancer survivors, some in their 30s, came to the Hill to ring the alarm, to applaud Wasserman Schultz for going public and to cry with her.

Now 42, the mother of three said she discovered a lump in December 2007 while doing a self-examination, and has since undergone seven major surgeries. She kept the illness private while campaigning for reelection and stumping nationwide for presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, then Barack Obama. She didn't want the illness to "define" her, Wasserman Schultz said. Most of her staff didn't know about her condition, according to a spokesman. Wasserman Schultz said that after learning she was at greater risk for the cancer to spread because of her Ashkenazi Jewish descent, she elected to have a double mastectomy, as well as the removal of her ovaries.

Her legislation, which seeks $9 million annually, has one of those memorable acronyms only members of Congress can invent: the EARLY (Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young) Act... The legislation would direct the Department of Health and Human Services to begin educational campaigns in high schools and universities. It has a particular focus on ethnic minorities such as young African American and Jewish women, who are at higher genetic risk.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/contehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032302801.htmlnt/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032302801.html



She found out that she carried the BRCA gene, and this prompted her for the double mastectomy and the removal of the ovaries. Not every breast cancer patient needs to take these drastic measures.

This is from the National Cancer Institute

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/brca
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I really admire that woman! Didn't her husband dump her during this time?
Real stand-up guy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know. None of this was discussed on either MSNBC
yesterday, or on GMA this morning. Apparently, only this past weekend she told her kids that her health problems from the previous years was cancer..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually, she appeared for 5 minutes on MSNBC yesterday, talking to Norah O'Donnell about it
right around noon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I know. I saw her. This was where she discussed her genetic mutation
and that she underwent double mastectomy.

But there was never any discussion about her husband..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does the national education campaign include money for tests and treatments?
Education won't do a damn thing for you if you still can't afford to go to the doctor.

I always wonder about these outfits that offer free screening mammograms to women who are not insured. They never tell us what they'll do if the mammogram indicates a problem. It can cost thousands, just to find out that weird area on the film is benign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thank you!
You get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. She is a tough woman and deserves great respect. How long before the slime media
at Fox "News", CNN , MSNBC start trashing her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. She certainly knows how to handle Fox
ep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz appeared on Hannity & Colmes last night (10/2/08) to discuss the preceding debate between Joe Biden and Sarah Palin. Sean Hannity did his best to trap her with his gotcha questions but his best was not good enough. She flat out refused to answer them and insisted on reframing the discussion. The result? She won Hannity's obvious admiration and respect.

http://www.newshounds.us/2008/10/03/debbie_wasserman_schultz_refuses_to_let_sean_hannity_frame_the_debate.php

and

I'm not a fan of Democrats appearing on FOXNews. I think it legitimizes a propaganda outlet stacked against Democrats and allows them to frame the issues. However, if Democrats who agree to appear on FOX do what Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida does here, then more power to them. Brit Hume desperately wants to paint the jam the Florida delegates are in as the fault of Florida State Legislature, despite the fact that it was really pushed by the Republican-led majority. So Hume tries to paint Wasserman-Schultz into a corner and she brooks no quarter from him and refuses to let him control the framing. Go Debbie!

http://crooksandliars.com/2008/03/09/foxnews-sunday-debbie-wasserman-schultz-rejects-brit-humes-framing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree that Democrats should not go on Fox "News" programs. They help
Fox to claim "fair and balanced" when it is really just a republican propaganda channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somewhere Sarah Palin is laughing at her

Just like she laughed at the female Alaskan legislator who had cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. She's actually a very lucky woman.. I hope she knows it..
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 03:15 PM by SoCalDem
She said yesterday she's had SEVEN operations in a year or so..

She "could" be a cashier at Walmart, and would probably not even know she HAD cancer at this point..

She has "Cadillac" insurance, at a price she could well afford, and she has a job where she can afford to take enough time off to HAVE seven surgeries, keep her job, and maintain the secrecy she wanted, about her situation..

Around here, people have to go public..hold car washes, bake sales, and beg in the newspapers.. that is, when they are not on hold on their phone, pressing "6" and then "4", holding for hours, until finally hearing from "Duane, the $10 hr benefit coordinator", that the procedure their doctor ordered, is not covered..oh and "have a nice day"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. And what about prostate cancer, which kills more men than breast cancer kills women?
A Gender Gap in Cancer

This year (2007) 218,890 men in the U.S. will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, according to the American Cancer Society. By comparison, 178,480 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in women. Not a huge difference, but a new report finds that for every prostate cancer drug on the market, there are seven used to treat breast cancer, and federal spending on breast cancer research outpaces prostate cancer spending by a ratio of nearly two to one.

The National Prostate Cancer Coalition, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Washington, released the report, titled "The Prostate Cancer Gap: A Crisis in Men's Health." It examines what the group calls "glaring disparities" in awareness, funding, media coverage, and research between prostate and breast cancer, even though prostate cancer is the second-deadliest cancer in men after lung cancer. "Year after year, the prostate cancer community has received less attention and less funding than many other diseases," says Dr. Richard Adkins, chief executive office and vice-chairman of the prostate cancer coalition.


The article continues here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Do you really want to discuss disparity between the genders in health care funding, etc.? I would,
but this is not the thread for it. No one should die of cancer, but in that discussion, men are not going to come out the victims, trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. CORRECT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Let's
Breast cancer: How much money is taken in by high profile fundraisers and events? How much funding does breast cancer research receive from the US federal government? How many medicines have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of breast cancer? Out of the total number of people diagnosed with breast cancer in a given year, what percentage will die of breast cancer within ten years? How many people diagnosed with breast cancer are diagnosed in the early stages when it is eminently treatable, thanks to massive public health campaigns financed by private and public sources?

Prostate cancer: How much money is taken in by high profile fundraisers and events? How much funding does prostate cancer research receive from the US federal government? How many medicines have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of prostate cancer? Out of the total number of people diagnosed with prostate cancer in a given year, what percentage will die of prostate cancer within ten years? How many people diagnosed with prostate cancer are diagnosed in the early stages when it is eminently treatable, thanks to massive public health campaigns financed by private and public sources?

Please keep the discussion on topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. As I said in my prior post, this is not the thread for that discussion.
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 07:54 PM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Just last week there have been reports that PSA test does not do anything
In most men, especially older ones, if there is a prostate cancer, it is a slow growing which will not kill them. Yet, many get tested and undergo painful biopsy and then surgery.

A medical correspondent on CNN actually said that men would be better off not getting tested for PSA since if there is a cancer they will have hard time, later on, getting an insurance.

My jaw dropped and yet I realized how right she is.

Still, some talk about a gender gap, comparing prostate cancer to cervical cancer which is almost always deadly. Apparently it can be detected with CA125 yet most insurance will not pay for it, unless there is a family member diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. This woman did a great job supporting Hillary, then immediately did a great job
supporting the nominee of her Party, with no half heartedness in either case. And all while she was going through this and maybe a separation.

Respect.

Best wishes.

Blessings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC