Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Surprise Recusal in Paul Minor Appeal Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:07 PM
Original message
Surprise Recusal in Paul Minor Appeal Hearing
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 10:10 PM by Hissyspit
Source: Huffington Post

Posted April 1, 2009 | 02:17 PM (EST)

A Surprise Recusal and Promising Result in Paul Minor Appeal Hearing

Paul Minor's appeal hearing in front of the 5th Circuit court this morning started off with an unexpected surprise. Shortly before the proceedings began, Priscilla Owen, one of the three judges hearing the appeal, announced her recusal.

Owen, whom the New York Times has described as "guided by the hand of Karl Rove," apparently took to heart Minor attorney Hiram Eastland's letter asking Owen to recuse herself since Rove is being investigated by Congress and the Justice Department for his possible role in targeting Minor for indictment. Owen was replaced immediately by Judge Fortunato Benavides, a Clinton appointee, adding a measure of balance to the panel, which would've been an all-Republican panel with Owen present. The appeal hearing lasted just 30 minutes but produced several key indicators that appeared to favor Paul Minor's appeal.

- snip -

The toughest questions came from Catharina Haynes, President Bush's sixth and final nominee to the Fifth Circuit who was confirmed by the Senate last April. Haynes repeatedly asked Collery, the government attorney, to specifically explain "what is the deal" that the government alleges Paul Minor had with the judges whom he was accused of bribing. Haynes pointed out that, in order to qualify as an explicit quid pro quo bribe, there had to be an agreement between Minor and the judges on a specific result, and also pointed out that Judge Teel wasn't even a judge yet, he was simply running for the judgeship at the time Minor contributed to his campaign, so how could there be a specific official action offered by Teel to Minor in return when Minor couldn't possibly have had any cases pending before Teel.

Asked again and again to supply a concrete example of what that crucial quid pro quo was, the DOJ attorney seemed to waffle badly, arguing (again, with "vague" charges as the New York Times described this case originally) that Minor's campaign contributions must've been meant as bribes for some "future decisions" in his favor from the Judges. Haynes, clearly understanding the requirement that there must be a specific official act in return for the contribution in order to constitute bribery, asked the DOJ attorney, "Don't you have to be able to articulate the deal?"

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/a-surprise-recusal-and-pr_b_181864.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Astonishing ...........
A judge recusing herself is always news. That it's a Rove-connected judge makes it newsworthy, especially in a politically-charged matter.

Interesting.

It seems to me that things are changing so fast, almost daily. And they're changing in the proper way..............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She should NEVER have been on that panel!
Hope I NEVER have to go to Mississippi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. She was one of the judges that were blocked
until the "gang of 14" made their deal. Their deal was that they would stay together as a block and would limit severely when they would filibuster to save the right to filibuster - but, in Alito's case, which was as clear an example of when the gang should have moved en masse to filibuster - they of course didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Paul Minor finally got a break

It is hard to believe he finally gets a chance at a real court hearing.

Great news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. We are still far from addressing how corrupt appointments to the bench have been for 8 yrs
Who got on the bench during the Bush Junta, and in particular under what screening criteria,
remains to be properly addressed. This sort of action may offer some ray of hope, but it is
very far from real attention to the real problem of the past 8 years, junta politicization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's Larisa's RawStory article on it:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm posting that in GD
:)

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good job,
you. :hi:

:batusismilie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. it has fallen like a stone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC