Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Siegelman attorney asks Holder to intervene

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:21 PM
Original message
Siegelman attorney asks Holder to intervene
Source: Salon

Siegelman attorney asks Holder to intervene
By BOB JOHNSON Associated Press Writer

Apr 3rd, 2009 | MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- The chief attorney for former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman is urging U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to ask a federal judge to throw out Siegelman's corruption conviction.

Attorney Vince Kilborn mailed a four-page letter to Holder on Friday, saying Siegelman's prosecution was filled with misconduct.

Kilborn says he wants Holder to treat Siegelman's case like he did the case of former U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska. Holder on Wednesday asked a judge to toss out Stevens' corruption conviction because prosecutors withheld evidence from his defense team during the trial.

Siegelman, a Democrat, and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy were convicted in 2006 of bribery and corruption charges.


Read more: http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/us/2009/04/03/D97B9LT00_siegelman_trial_holder/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd~ I hope this is
possible to happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. A Surprise Recusal and Promising Result in Paul Minor Appeal Hearing by Brendan DeMelle
Another political case likely under review now, Paul Minor:

Surprise Recusal and Promising Result in Paul Minor Appeal Hearing
by Brendan DeMelle - http://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Surprise-Recusal-and-Pro-by-Brendan-DeMelle-090402-249.html

End of the day, pardons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
48. Thanks for posting that tidbit, L. Coyote. That is very good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Siegelman should not have to beg.
It shows Rove still has power and media credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Exactly. That slime Stevens gets off and Don has to BEG?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. To be fair,
Do we know that Stevens' lawyers DIDN'T ask AG Holder to review the case? I am under the impression that cases are reviewed the the United States Attorney General when he is requested to do so, not automatically.

I am sure Holder will review the case now that he has been asked to do so. A petition to review by a defense attorney is not BEGGING. It is PROTOCOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. Damn Right! Why No Action NOW!
Yesterday in fact! No sarcasm here; what's the fucking hold up????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernest Partridge Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
55. Can Holder or Obama intervene with Siegelman case?
My guess (and it's only that) is that the Stevens trial was a federal case, and the Siegleman trial was a state case. Thus the AG Holder can't intervene. Likewise, Obama can't pardon.

I hope I'm wrong, and that Holder and/or Obama will do the right thing.

Any lawyers out there who can help me with this?

Ernest Partridge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #55
65. It was a problem stemming from the DOJ
under the Bush administration.

Rove is implicated and supposed to be testifying, but only when he gets time out from his WSJ and Newsweek and FOX media jobs.

Sorry, no excuses on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yay!! I hope that happens
:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I love the kitty ani's!!!
I wish I could do that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. It will be very telling
whether or not Holder does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Definitely agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. yup, since he proclaimed 'principle'
as the reasoning behind dismissing the other cases charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. Indeed.
We're watching and waiting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Perhaps we should also ask Sarah Palin if Don Siegelman should get a "do-over" too!
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 07:50 PM by cascadiance
And ask why not if she says no. Is it because only Republicans should get "doovers"?

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/04/03/Palin-state-GOP-want-election-do-over/UPI-46121238801560/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. You really think Sarah Palin knows who Don Siegelman is?
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 08:37 PM by tritsofme
Way up there in Alaska?

I think you're deluding yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. All the more reason to trap her with such a question!
Would serve her well to have to answer it if she's running for re-election any time soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. You really think Sarah Palin knows who Don Siegelman is?
Why not....after all Sarah reads ALL the magazines and newspapers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
44. She'd better. They've both spent time in the "governor's club" after all.
She came in a few years after he left his job, but still, you don't think she "noticed" when someone in her peer group got sent to jail? You don't think it was a topic of gossipy conversation at those governors' meetings that are held periodically?

Come on. She's no Rhodes Scholar, but she's sufficiently politically aware to pay attention to what's happening in her own sphere of influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. I would have said the same thing, until I saw her in action last year.
Between those interviews and the debates, I think she really is as stupid as her worst critic makes her out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R!
Make it so, AG Holder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. timing is everything..
and the timing for this could not be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. that would rock! anyway it's only right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ro1942 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. senate
stevens got a standing ovation from his peers after his conviction, i'm sure he's got dirt on them. they are just protecting the status quo. dems. repukes. and corp. america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. I believe that Stevens was just the first.
Holder did say he was reviewing Justice Department policies and practices under the previous administration...perhaps there is a list of cases where prosecutorial misconduct is at play and the fact that Stevens case was the first to be overturned was a political decision and just preparing the way for the Siegelman case. And, there may be many others. The Bush Justice Department was an Orwellian misnomer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Bush Justice remains an oxymoran.
The Rs are obstructing Obama's OLC nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Bush's Justice Dept. relocating....
April 3, 2009
ODNI(Nat'l Intelligence) APPOINTS NEW INSPECTOR GENERAL
Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair has appointed Ms. Roslyn A. Mazer, a Justice Department Official, as Inspector General (IG) of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Since 2002, Ms. Mazer has served as Investigative Counsel in the Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, where she has led teams of attorneys, inspectors, and auditors in conducting complex review of the FBI’s compliance with Attorney General Guidelines, congressionally-mandated review of National Security Letter authorities, and allegations of misconduct by Department personnel. She has served in the Department of Justice for more than 14 years, including as Associate Deputy Attorney General. Prior to her federal service, Ms. Mazer was in private practice.

http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/20090403_release.pdf

Yesterday, April 2, 2009:

REPORT BLASTS THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

<<The I.G. 'blaster'/whistleblower is replaced. New IG worked for BushCo's Just-Us Dept. ran by Albert Gonzales>> xxx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'm confused. If she's been in D of J over 14 years, wouldn't that make her a Clinton appointee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
46. She also worked for Clinton. She's a career civil servant.
If you do the math based on her resume, it looks like she was a CLINTON appointee.

She has served in the Department of Justice for more than 14 years, including as Associate Deputy Attorney General. Prior to her federal service, Ms. Mazer was in private practice.


Pesky, pesky facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
58. Thank you for the clarification
Relief! Glad to hear she's from the Clinton era. This investigative Intelligence agency needs to be watched closely now that Obama is in and so many changes coming (albeit too slow for me). Contacting military I.G.'s might be more helpful for now than beating the dead horses in Congress.

Office of the Director of National Intelligence - 703-733-8600
*Edward Maguire* oops, ousted for blasting, replaced by Ms. Roslyn A. Mazer (above).
Inspector General
Washington, DC 20511
http://www.dni.gov /


Department of Defense - Pentagon switchboard 703-545-6700
Gordon S. Heddell
Acting Inspector General
1400 Defense Pentagon
Washington DC 20301-1400
www.Defenselink.mil


National Security Agency Public Affairs: 301-688-6524
George Ellard
Inspector General
9800 Savage Rd.
Ft. Meade, Maryland 20755
http://www.nsa.gov /


Central Intelligence Agency - main: 703-482-0623
John L. Helgerson
Inspector General
Washington DC 20515
www.cia.gov


U.S. Department of Justice
Glenn Fine - useless
Inspector General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
66. Ms. Roslyn Mazer
Found more info, she sounds Hopeful and impressive actually..... xxx

Full article: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/04/mazer_odni_ig.html

Article excerpts:

...from 1996 to 2000 Ms. Mazer was the first chair of the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP), which is among the most successful classification reform initiatives of the last half century. At a time when agency Inspectors General may be asked to assume greater oversight over classification policy, she brings an exceptional depth of knowledge and experience to the subject.

...Under Ms. Mazer’s leadership from 1996 to 2000, the ISCAP declassified information in an astounding 80% of the documents that were presented for its review.

...In fact, Ms. Mazer’s ISCAP was so successful in overturning spurious classification claims that the Central Intelligence Agency begged for relief from ISCAP jurisdiction.

...Ms. Mazer will succeed Edward Maguire, the outgoing ODNI Inspector General who presented his own critique of the ODNI in testimony before a hearing (pdf) of Rep. Anna Eshoo’s House Intelligence subcommittee last week (“IG Report Blasts the Director of National Intelligence,” Secrecy News, April 2, 2009).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Got my fingers crossed
:kick: for justice


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think this attorney is getting ready to claim some of the credit
when Holder does what he was about to do anyway -- having defused the reaction by first tossing out the Stevens case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. It was apparently in process as soon as Stevens was announced, however
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 09:39 AM by L. Coyote
that remains conjecture from broad statements.

The lead attorney likely acts on Siegelman's instructions,
and a request in writing is an official act that creates
a minimal expectation of response to the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. The attorney is Seiglman's lawyer
and as such this is his job. If Seiglman gets freed, his attornies deserve the credit, they have been defending him for ages now. Until Holder acts, this is the only thing this attorney could or should be doing. He can not afford to rest on assumptions of the future actions of the DOJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm waiting to see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
26. The root of the problem
is Ku Klux Karl Rove. The sooner the U.S. Attorney issue is exposed the better. It's not only about those who were fired for not engaging in political prosecutions at Rove's bidding, it's more about those who kept their jobs like Chris Christie who started a bogus investigation into Senator Robert Menendez just prior to his election for Senate. Christie is now poised to run for governor of New Jersey as a reward for malicious prosecution of New Jersey Democrats. And in the Menendez case he violated Justice Department guidelines in regard to launching investigations of candidates 60 days prior to an election.
The criminal Rove must be prosecuted, convicted and incarcerated before the Justice Department can do the people's work as opposed to working for political scoundrels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OakCliffDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. K and R'ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OakCliffDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. This stinks of a deal cut with the Bush Administration to dish out pardons.
If Attorney General Holder is handing out what equates to Bush pardons after the little chimp has left office, what benefit does Bush get from this. I smell a deal cut to preclude prosecution of Bush Administration people in exchange for pardons not granted upon his exit. Rove and Cheney are probably giving themselves high fives right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. The way I heard it,
the prosecution was so inept that an honest person would have no choice but to do what he did. I take it as the *Bush* administration set it up. (Not that I have all the details, so my current opinion is subject to revision.)

I can't believe they addressed this before Seigelman, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. This is a response required in a criminal prosecution sentencing a US Senator
for his conviction on seven felony counts related to
hiding illegal quid pro quo gifts from corrupt businessmen
whose interests he represented in government.

Needless to say, this is not a minor matter easily ignored,
especially when the court schedule is a matter of rights,
and a motion for a retrial is pending and must be dealt with.
This matter had to be attended to now on the court's schedule!

Rove and Cheney should be sweating right now
along with every high official in the Bush Junta,
especially those who knew it was a Junta beforehand.
Torture and murder have no statute of limitations.

Stealing a state governor's election and locking up
a state's Democratic political leader is small worries
relative to the crimes they are really worried about.
Torture and murder have no statute of limitations.

Siegleman's case may be a weak point in the conspiracy
because a low-level operative bailed out and testified.
Why the considerable effort to disassociate from the Junta?
Torture and murder have no statute of limitations.

Did I mention, "Torture and murder have no statute of limitations."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmac3 Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
31. Request for AG intervention . . . .
I firmly believe Holder's reaction and/or inaction on this request will be a truly huge measure of what we can expect from this newly appointed head of justice. Do we get a man of law with great intelligence and integrity exercising law "by the book" or do we get a political chess piece that judges on political views and sways under political power.
I can only hope that we finally have a true man of law in this extremely powerful position.
:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. This travesty needs to be fully exposed not JUST dismissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Many travesties of Justice in just Siegelman's case alone
Abramoff-Rove-Reed-Falwell illegal campaign financing of 2002 Republican Riley.
Stolen 2002 election after losing by a few votes, politicization of AL Justice.
To win the 2006 re-election, charging Siegelman with crimes.
Fixing the trial, improper prosecutorial conduct.
Improper political relationships with faux recusals.
Everyday dirty tricks in Alabama politics, like fixing judges.
Jailing Siegelman during appeal.

So many co-conspirators, it's Titanic. I'm not surprised one jumped this ship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
road2000 Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. I fully agree, mod mom.
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 12:15 PM by road2000
All the dirty work by Rove and minions should see the light of day. Alabama was not the only state in which they corrupted the justice system and initiated political witch hunts. And, before going after Siegelman, Rove fixed a judicial election in Alabama. That's documented.

"Little Florida" in the Baldwin County seat of Bay Minette was a travesty (when the vote count favoring Siegelman was mysteriously overturned in the dead of night to Riley's favor, thus throwing the election to him).

A dismissal would merely bury skeletons that must be brought out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
37. Why Do We Have So MAny More Recs For This Than Responses?
C'mon people, chime in!!! It's the patriotic thing to do!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. Because sometimes the obvious gets neglected in all the fuss.
That the Stevens case be overturned for prosecutorial misconduct, yet this case be allowed to stand on the verdict by the appellate court (that only dismissed what, three charges/convictions and let the others stand?),is even to the numbest-from-the-neck-up a miscarriage of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
56. Many of us have chimed in on this issue
And if Holder does not act I'm afraid to say it but I will no longer have any confidence in the Obama Administration. I don't want to feel that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. I think you should do yourself a favor.
and declare that you have no faith in the Obama Administration. Believe me, things will not be done on your time table. Can you imagine if 1% of the population called their representatives and demanded investigation? Who knows what would happen? It's never been done before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. If they let Ted Steves of they shoudl as fuck had better help Siegelman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
45. K&R!! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
47. Alabama Madam dead by hanging in federal jail cell
I would like to know why the madam from Alabama was found hanging in a jail cell in Tom Delay's Brazoria County Texas after she supposedly had escaped from a Federal trusty camp in Bastrop, Texas - at the same time I, myself, was being approached by the FBI and other LE to Sextort-to-blackmail "State and Political officials".

Why was this Alabama madam selected for prosecution from all the yellow escort page ads?

Recall CIA madams DC Deborah Palfrey and Brandi Britton of (CIA) Maryland were both found dead by hanging also. I imagine there are others as well and globally.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/robin_head.html

xxxMadMadam

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XXXMADAM Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. 1993 CIA PIMPS
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 02:05 PM by XXXMADAM
This was also the exact same time when DC madam Palfrey, while on Federal parole for 'Extortion' in her 1st escort service, opened her 2nd escort service in Wash. DC while living across the nation in California.
Time vicinity that the Waco Davidian babies burned. Still smoldering from the ash heap they came to my house in Houston. Both Bush's running for political office, totally hostile towards Clinton.
I wonder whatever became of my co-workers who were tricked-n-trafficed into jails abroad, Bangkok, etc... One madam from Dallas got a Life sentence abroad.

WASHINGTON TERRORIST PIMPS
Predatory PIMPS

Stop them before they PIMP and HANG again!

xxxMadMadam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mark D. Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
51. President Obama - Please Pardon Don Siegelman
President Obama - Please Pardon Don Siegelman. This might deserve it's own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. I prefer he is acquitted of
all wrong doing. He doesn't need pardoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
52. Stevens made it possible for the Holder DOJ to intervene. They better do it quick
before people forget about Stevens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Any chance it was timed
exactly this way on purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
57. And this is what happens when a prosecutor's integrity is called into question.
I just work for a local, yokel county prosecutor. Nevertheless, we would NEVER engage in the conduct that happened in the Steven's case. We have never fabricated evidence and we give Brady material to the defense routinely.

Obviously we don't want to create a miscarriage of justice, reversible error or an ethics violation. Just as important, we don't want a reputation for misconduct, either. If we did, then this is what happens. Defendants would claim everything we did was suspicious either out of legitimate concern or else just to play the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
60. Rec #83
The truth has been out there for some time.
God, so many people belong in jail...so many leftover Bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
63. Rec'd! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
64. Anyone know when the US Attorneys hired under Bush
are going to tender their resignations? Isn't that customary when a new administration comes in? Is this just another way to seed the Obama administration with holdovers who will undermine the work to clean up the huge mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC