|
Edited on Fri Apr-10-09 08:41 PM by Peace Patriot
Well, here's some food for thought for those interested: Lula da Silva, president of Brazil, said the following about Chavez, last year: "They can invent a lot of things to criticize Chavez, but not on democracy!"
He should know. He's neighbors with Chavez and meets with him monthly on economic planning and other issues. And Barack Obama recently said, of da Silva, that he is the most popular politician in the world.
Actually, Chavez and some of his other allies--Evo Morales, of Bolivia, Rafael Correa, of Ecuador, and Fernando Lugo, of Paraguay--arguably the most leftist leaders in South America--have higher approval ratings than da Silva, I think. Lugo had a 92% (!) approval rating just after his inauguration last year. Chavez, Morales and Correa run in the 60% to 70% range. Da Silva is certainly popular--but I don't know if he's that popular (the most popular in the world--that would be Lugo in Paraguay).
In any case, would any of these democratically elected presidents be so enthusiastically and happily and closely allied with a "dictator"?
The "dictators" are those who slander Chavez with this epithet--Bushwhacks, our corpo/fascist 'news' monopolies, the rich and the corporate, the Miami mafia. You are in exceedingly disreputable company if you repeat their bullshit lines about Chavez or any of the new leftist leaders of Latin America.
-------------------------
The second part of this Associated Pukes article is interesting:
The Venezuelan leader also said he was encouraged by U.S. authorities' cooperation in a large drug bust aboard a Venezuelan boat off South America. Chavez said the U.S. Coast Guard detected the Venezuelan-flagged boat in international waters and 'called and asked permission to board.'
"'Now they're going to turn over to us the boat, the drugs, the prisoners. Those are good signals because that didn't used to happen, Chavez said.
"U.S. Coast Guard spokesman Lt. Matt Moorlag in Miami said the Coast Guard located the Venezuela-flagged fishing boat 500 miles (800 kilometers) east of Brazil, boarded the vessel Wednesday and found about 2,500 pounds (1,135 kilograms) of cocaine."
Would the U.S. Coast Guard turn "the boat, the drugs, the prisoners" over to a "dictator"? No, clearly under "new management," the U.S. Coast Guard is going to turn these items over to the legitimate, elected government of Venezuela, as it should.
But what is truly remarkable about this article is that it was published at all. It's the second article in two days, by the Associated Pukes, with positive news about Chavez. And they don't even say, "Hugo Chavez, friend of Fidel Castro." After eight years of lies, disinformation, black holes where information should be, slander, propaganda, highly selective facts, bias, spin, mistranslation and god knows what all journalistic crimes by AP against this perfectly good leader of Venezuela, the Associated Pukes have changed their tune, and are coming on all fair and reasonable and objective and everything. No snide remarks. No scurrilous characterizations. No planted quotes dissing Chavez. It is very revealing. The Associated Pukes (AP) = CIA. You can always tell what's in and what's out, at Langley, on Latin America, by following AP's newswire. So, this is quite encouraging news. It may mean that Obama has finally taken charge of Latin American foreign policy--after a really rocky period of transition (with a lot of Bushwhack holdovers in the State Dept., the CIA and other agencies, apparently trying to sabotage potential good relations between Obama and Chavez).
This doesn't necessarily means the war's off. There are plenty of billionaire Bushwhacks with lots of stolen funds, armies and operatives, who could still try to pull it off (--the civil wars they had planned for Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia, to gain control of the oil by creating secessionist, fascist mini-states). But it appears--and I stress, appears, because Obama Latin America policy is still a great unknown--that it will have to be done without U.S. support, or will have to be delayed until they can Diebold Obama out of office, or will possibly have to be abandoned, and other strategies used.
AP would not be fair to Chavez unless they had been told to do so, by insiders. AP is a tool of the U.S. government--i.e., a tool of U.S. corporate interests. And this is a rather clear signal that our government, and the corporate interests that it serves, have a new strategy in Latin America of making nice. The obvious thing to me is that they have found that "divide and conquer" doesn't work. They found that out this last September, when the Bushwhacks tried their fascist coup in Bolivia. The continent pulled together like never before. And they have found it out over the last year, when every effort to "isolate" Chavez, and to demonize him and his closest allies, has failed. The other leaders of South America will not have it. They will not take this crap any more.
We who have been following Latin American events knew this. But it was rather a big question whether or not Latin America would go its own way, with UNASUR and their own currency, driven by Washington's arrogance, greed and insult (and possibly continued attempted gross interference), or whether the new Obama administration would make peace, and end our bullying, disrespectful, obnoxious, greed-driven policies toward our nearest neighbors. Obama is simply not strong enough, politically, to defy our corporate masters--not yet, anyway. So, I think it's fair to assume that he is in accord with them, on the failure of Bushwhack policy, and trying a new strategy, that is more realistic, and more likely to win favor for our corporate interests in Latin America.
This turnabout by the Associated Pukes rather points that way. The subject matter doesn't matter much--it could have been anything, and they could have ignored this particular story (as they have ignored many positive stories about Chavez and his government). They didn't. And they had a similar story yesterday.
Anybody else struck by this?
|