Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Justice Dept. Official Violated Ethics Rules in Grant-Making

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 04:26 PM
Original message
Report: Justice Dept. Official Violated Ethics Rules in Grant-Making
Source: Washington Post

A former Justice Department grant-making administrator violated federal ethics and procurement rules in awarding hundreds of thousands of dollars in sole source contracts to ideologically favored companies and individuals, the department's inspector general concluded today.

The administrator, J. Robert Flores, was a political appointee during former president George Bush's administration who left his post after the inauguration in January. The department's public integrity section declined to pursue civil or criminal charges against Flores after ethics watchdogs forwarded their findings, investigators said.

The report issued this morning culminates a nearly two-year investigation into alleged irregularities with grants awarded by the Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention during the Bush administration.

Investigators focused in part on the hiring of Hector Rene Fonseca, a former Colombian military official who worked as a contractor to the office between November 2004 and July 2007, when he collected about $281,000 for his work on anti-gang programs.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/30/AR2009043002302.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. So? Are we planning to do anything about it?
Or is just knowing we were ripped off enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's a good question.
What's going to be the line when it emerges--as I fully expect it will--that there was a person like this deliberately placed in every department and independent office in the executive branch? I know for sure the same games were played all over the Department of the Interior, and others tell me that EPA, HHS, and others were equally unethical and corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Naming isn't dealing. No dealing, no healing.
Happy karma to whoever is making these decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. The headline writers will need to add to their style manual
While this headline is technically correct, it is becoming increasingly important that headline writers distinguish between the current government and bush's criminal regime much as German papers did after Hitler.

This headline should have read, "Report: Bush-Era Justice Dept. Official Violated Ethics Rules in Grant-Making"

But then, I suppose that wouldn't entice a potential reader to read the piece. They'd just shrug it off like a "sun is rising" headline and turn the page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. if the department won't press charges, how can we?
It was our taxes that were misused. We should be able to file at least civil charges against the bastard, with all of the money to be paid back into government coffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do they even bother...
2 years to come up with nothing?

Investigators said they could not conclude based on all the evidence and 30 witness interviews, however, that Fonseca's contract amounted to a "misuse" of Justice Department funds.

---------------------------------------

Investigators ultimately said that they could not determine whether the awards were appropriate because there weren't enough documents to reflect department decision-making at the time.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) decried the "abuses, ethical lapses and cronyism" that he said the report detailed and called the findings "consistent with what we have seen in so many parts of the Department of Justice under the past administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC