Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shanna Moakler Slams Miss California with NO H8 Campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:08 AM
Original message
Shanna Moakler Slams Miss California with NO H8 Campaign
Source: softpedia

The campaign is, according to Us Magazine, aimed at slamming Proposition 8 and eliminating discrimination on the grounds of orientation, which is precisely what Prejean did on the Miss USA finale, it is being said. Because Moakler has already spoken her mind about Miss California’s answer regarding marriage, it is believed the campaign is her way of showing the younger beauty queen just how wrong she was when she said that only a man and a woman should be free to legally wed. The fact that two other former California beauty queens are also featured in the new ads only comes to reinforce this.

The shots feature Moakler surrounded by beauty queens, with tape on their mouth and the words NO H8 (No Hate) scribbled on their cheeks in bright colors. The American flag can be seen in the background, while the girls, although not in their pageant attires, are wearing their tiaras proudly. And posing is not all Moakler does, as she’s also more than willing to speak to the media about her involvement in the latest campaign and about how it’s supposed to at least educate the public about current legislation.

“I believe Prop 8 lead a campaign of confusion and never made clear what was being asked of the people.” Moakler says for the mag. “I find most people have a problem with the word marriage. What I hope for is helping others understand ‘civil union’ and then one day helping people learn ‘marriage’ is something not God, not the state or country can solidify, but between two people who love each other.” the former beauty queen further explains.

Her and the other girls’ involvement has been nothing short of a surprise, and a very pleasant one while we’re at it. “We never expected to have so many beauty queens participate. The whole campaign, obviously, is not a direct message to Miss California, but now she happened to have put herself in the line of fire. If Carrie is going to go out there with her message, then we have to go out there and make sure the voices of these girls are heard. And that they are what Miss USA should stand for, too.” Adam Bouska of NO H8 tells the media.

Read more: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Shanna-Moakler-Slams-Miss-California-with-NO-H8-Campaign-110592.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Mokler is a mentsch. GO, HONEY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why hasn't Prejean's title been taken
and given to the next in line to represent CA? Isn't there some kind of clause which says they are supposed to stay away from unnecessary controversy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That may not apply when it's the judges who introduce the controversy
She should have just given some rambling nonsensical answer like most of the other contestants do. That is the real affront here--beauty queens aren't supposed to think that deeply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, but she chose to go on her little tour of hate.
But I bet they don't want to strip her title because the fundies would freak out. They want her to step down on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theblasmo Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Fake Boobs
The Miss CA people bought her fake boobs, so I doubt they'll do anything to her. Loss of revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Fake boobs, fake smile, fake brain, and fake religion -- she's got it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, coming from the same woman who helped Miss California get fake boobs
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni0767658/

Miss California's Fake Boobs Exposed1 May 2009 12:55 AM, PDT | From wenn.com | See recent WENN news

The beauty queen at the centre of a same sex marriage fuss in America has been exposed as a fake - Miss California pageant bosses paid for her breast augmentation.

Pretty Carrie Prejean hit headlines around the world last month when she spoke out against gay marriage onstage at the Miss USA pageant - and she has since been defending her right to voice an opinion.

And, after weeks of speculation, Miss USA California co-executive director Shanna Moakler - a former Miss America - has admitted she was among pageant bosses who agreed to help Prejean get a boob job.

Speaking to U.S. news show Access Hollywood on Thursday, Moakler said, "It was something that we all spoke about together and she wanted it and we supported that decision."

Asked if the pageant bosses paid for the surgery, Moakler said, "Yes, we did... Breast implants in pageants today is not a rarity... It's very common."

_______________________________________________

I'm glad Ms Moakler sees our side of the story but personally I think NONE of them are a good spokesperson when it comes to equality anywhere in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. So no longer are beauty pageants about someone's NATURAL
attractiveness, body dimensions, and talents. It's all FAKE!!!

Why did I think it was otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DollyM Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Gosh, what a role model for little girls . . .
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:15 AM by DollyM
I find it disturbing that Miss California feels that being surgically enhanced sends a good message to our little girls. That alone would turn me off on her winning. (So it's okay to have fake boobs but not okay to give a politically correct (fake) answer in order to win the crown? It sounds like the correct person won after all!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's bad enough that the contestant got the fake boobs - but in this case...
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:20 AM by LynneSin
Ms. Moakler and the California Pagent officials helped buy them for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trocadero Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Shanna has been in the news lately in a gossip item with Gerard Butler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. hehe.
“We never expected to have so many beauty queens participate."

I guess they only expected ordinary queens. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC