Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP blocks Obama pick for Interior deputy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:22 PM
Original message
GOP blocks Obama pick for Interior deputy
Source: MSNBC.com

WASHINGTON - Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's pick for the No. 2 job at the Interior Department Wednesday in a dispute over oil and gas leases, but Democrats signaled they would soon make a second attempt to win confirmation.

The 57-39 vote was three short of the 60 needed to advance David Hayes past Republican objections, and made him the first of Obama's top-level nominees to be sidetracked on the Senate floor.

Hayes, an environmental lawyer picked by Obama to serve as deputy secretary of the Interior Department, held the same post during the last three years of the Clinton administration. He also led Obama's natural resources transition team, responsible for naming a new Interior Department head.

Republican opposition to Hayes' nomination was led by Utah Sen. Bob Bennett, who was angered by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's recent decision to revoke 77 oil and gas leases in Bennett's home state. He was joined by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who raised questions about the administration's plans for oil and gas development and objected to recent reversals of several Bush-era rules on endangered species and mountaintop mining.



Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30722867/



Drill, baby, drill!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well look at that. All 39 Republicans were there that day.
Bet they won't all be there next week, as many of them will take off early to go on extended vacations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah, a lot of them (the ones that are STILL there)................
........got fat & lazy after the first 6 yrs of Bush. How many days did they work, 30, 40??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. This 60 vote shit
Is ridiculous. Bush didn't need 60 did he? Why do we again bow down to these asshole Repukes. We almost had a 20 vote lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How are we bowing down?
it takes 60 votes to invoke cloture that's the rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They are obstructing to a totally unprecedented degree. Democrats did nowhere near as much of this
Edited on Wed May-13-09 04:09 PM by No Elephants
when the Republicans controlled under Clinton or from 2000 to 2006.

The technical rules of the game has not changed, but the Republicans are re-writing the unspoken rules. If this is how it is going to be, the Democrats should threaten he nuclear option and, if necessary, use it. Elections have consequences. If it's going to be winner take all from now on, so be it. Let's surface that, just so we all know very clearly what's at stake at election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, it's retaliation & spite, nothing more. Not the qualifications of the nominee. Take note. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. exactly
and it'll be the same way with the SCOTUS nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC