Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Georgia, South Dakota banks bring failures to 55 in '09

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:10 PM
Original message
Georgia, South Dakota banks bring failures to 55 in '09
Source: CBS Marketwatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Winder, Ga.-based First Piedmont Bank and Sioux Falls, S.D.-based BankFirst were closed by regulators Friday, bringing the number of U.S. bank failures in 2009 to 55 as the credit crisis continues to claim victims.

First Piedmont Bank the 10th to fail in Georgia this year. Athens, Ga.-based First American Bank and Trust Company has agreed to assume the failed bank's deposits, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

First Piedmont had $115 million in assets and $109 million in deposits as of July 6, the FDIC said. Its failure should cost the deposit insurance fund $29 million.

BankFirst is the first South Dakota-based bank to fail since 1992, according to the FDIC.

Grand Forks, N.D.-based Alerus Financial, National Association has agreed to assume the failed bank's deposits.

Read more: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/georgia-bank-is-54th-us-failure-of-2009-2009717183600?siteid=bnbh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. South Dakota bank failed due to home loans made out of state...


..."BankFirst's failure is an isolated incident that arose from risky out-of-state loans, Ness said."

""By and large, South Dakota banks are very secure."

Sioux Falls ArgusLeader:Bank closure first in decades
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Living in South Dakota, I would have to agree with that.
Our banks are, for the most part, quite secure, and we haven't had a lot of the "bankster" issues in this state that too many others have had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There were also 2 CA bank failures yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC