Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reports: Christie made loan to top aide, failed to report it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:11 PM
Original message
Reports: Christie made loan to top aide, failed to report it
Source: Gannett New Jersey

As U.S. Attorney in 2007, Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie did not report a $46,000 loan he gave to an aide, according to published reports and the Christie campaign.

Christie did not disclose the amount on his income tax return or elsewhere as required under federal and state ethics rules, said reports in The New York Times and the Star-Ledger. Both papers said the information was first broadcast on NJN Monday

Michele A. Brown, his executive assistant and counsel while he was U.S. Attorney, borrowed the money from Christie during his tenure as the state's top federal prosecutor, according to mortgage records in Morris County, the report said.

The failure to disclose the loan on ethics filings and in his tax returns was essentially an oversight, his aides, according to the report.


Read more: http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20090818/NEWS01/90818027/1006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Political prosecutions, entrapment, now this.
This is just short of bribery. How are we losing to this prick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because 46 thousand is an inconsequential amount to him.
The thing to find out is how he can afford to consider 46 thousand as pocket change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, this is new and I think it will hurt
Edited on Wed Aug-19-09 07:36 AM by karynnj
It is something that is easily understood on many levels. The easiest may be simple income tax evasion. I really don't see how he can claim he just "forgot" That. If we're lucky, he risked not reporting income - a pretty serious thing to do, because there were reasons that he wanted to hide the relationship.

This should hurt him because he is running as a "clean" reformer of corruption. On the issues, he loses and this makes it hard to see him as "cleaner" than the governor -- or even as clean. I had been dreading doing phone banking and canvasing because I know from the past that so many people would spontaneously bring up corruption - so, a real reformer, personally clean - no matter how out of step politically could have a real chance. (In fact, I loved doing some phone banking in MA last year. In about 50 calls, not one said all politicians were crooks or mentioned corruption. They were much nicer on average than the NJ phone banking I did. )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. another bribe for a mistress or what?
God these people are so predictable. We've been saying "you can't make this stuff up", but from now on, this book looks like it's rewriting itself over and over and over again.

Finally, Republicans, have you no decency? No shame? No values? What exactly is it that you would say you DO stand for, other than corruption, lies, philandering, and trying to overtake the government to create a theocracy based on your crazy Third Wave religious beliefs, which just by chance happen to have crowned you entitled kings and queens of the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. "essentially an oversight" ....... RIIIIIIIIGHT
Translation: "Non-essentially a bribe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC