Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Caught Lying, Yet Again, On "Face the Nation." ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:55 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld Caught Lying, Yet Again, On "Face the Nation." ...
full title--Rumsfeld Caught Lying, Yet Again, On "Face the Nation."
But This Time, a Journalist Actually Threw It In His Face.

snip

SCHIEFFER: Well, let me just ask you this. If they did not have these
weapons of mass destruction, though, granted all of that is true, why then
did they pose an immediate threat to us, to this country?

Sec. RUMSFELD: Well, you're the--you and a few other critics are the only
people I've heard use the phrase `immediate threat.' I didn't. The president
didn't. And it's become kind of folklore that that's--that's what's
happened. The president went...

snip

Mr. FRIEDMAN: We have one here. It says `some have argued that the nu'--this
is you speaking--`that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent, that
Saddam is at least five to seven years away from having nuclear weapons. I
would not be so certain.'

snip

Sec. RUMSFELD: Mm-hmm. It--my view of--of the situation was that he--he
had--we--we believe, the best intelligence that we had and other countries
had and that--that we believed and we still do not know--we will know.

http://www.buzzflash.com/buzzscripts/buzz.dll/content

Put these bastards under oath and then interview them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG! This was his ACTUAL reply? Is he losing his mind or did he ever
have one? It doesn't even make sense!

<snip>
Sec. RUMSFELD: Mm-hmm. It--my view of--of the situation was that he--he
had--we--we believe, the best intelligence that we had and other countries
had and that--that we believed and we still do not know--we will know.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol... lots of words in there
but still not even a sentence, much less an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He's lied so often that he doesn't know what to say at this point...
...couldn't happen to a better NeoCon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Whoppers of Mass Distraction-Related Program Activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Whoppers of Mass Distraction
Sums up the bu$h misadministration to a "T"
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Who said that he is just NOW losing his mind??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. well there are known knowns
known unknowns, unknown unknows...ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. that one has been set to music
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1761585

Check out the audio link for the musical version of this classic:

The Unknown

As we know,
There are known knowns.
There are things we know we know.
We also know
There are known unknowns.
That is to say
We know there are some things
We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns,
The ones we don't know
We don't know.

Department of Defense news briefing
Feb. 12, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoa, what was that???
Please don't tell me that these are the people running our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yeah, I can't wait until the grownups are back in charge again....
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 12:13 AM by DemoVet
I think I'd give Madeleine Albright another shot at Sec of State, maybe bring Sam Nunn out of retirement for Sec of Defense...damn, my 6-year old can lie better than that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I watched the show this AM
He was playing word games. He did not say "immediate", he said adjacent, at hand, continuous, hasty, imminent, instantaneous, nearest, present, prompt, straightforward and a few others not listed in a thesaurus. But he nor the President said "immediate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. So immediate is not the same or more threatening than...
continuous? imminent? instantaneous? nearest? present? prompt?

For crying out loud why would anyone use continuous, nearest or prompt in that context?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. It may be the same thing.
But it is not the exact word he used. That is the game that Rumsfeld was playing today. That is the game the WH has played on a few different occasions. If a woman is a luscious goddess, according to Rumsfeld that does not say, mean or even imply that she is beautiful. Maybe he has a command of the English language that I can not compete with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. They are experts at "parsing" in order to avoid,...
,...the technical legal terminology which would demonstrate blatant (rather than audacious) deception.

They make me wanna :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. On MTP...
Condi was dancing around the "immediate threat" words not actually having been spoken. This is from the hairballs who pilloried the Big Dog for parsing his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rumfool at work
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. So is that a "known known" an "unknown known" or an "unknown unknown"?
Edited on Sun Mar-14-04 11:36 PM by arikara
Honestly, he just about tops the chimp for the idiocy of his bushisms. the guy is such a foul moran!

More rumdums...


<snip>
"There are things we know that we know," Rumsfeld said. "There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — things we do not know we don't know."
Feeling fuzzy? Don't worry. Secretary Rumsfeld had a firm grasp on the situation. The amazing orator proceeded to explain everything.
"So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say, 'Well, that's basically what we see as the situation,' that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns," Rumsfeld said. "And each year we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns."
Well, that's certainly comforting. I'm glad the top dog at the Department of Defense is an open, honest man. If only we could figure out what he was saying. I sense a true willingness to be helpful on Rumsfeld's part: he sincerely tried to convey his meaning to the press. He even tried a little more elaboration.
"There is another way to phrase that and that is that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence," Rumsfeld said.

<snip>

http://www.ksusentinel.com/news/2002/06/12/Viewpoints/Rumsfeld.Up.To.Semantics-255540.shtml

(edited for typo)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh, I nearly forgot...
Time to haul out my favorite portrait of Rummy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh my...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. MY EYES! MY EYES! ROFLMAO!
:evilgrin: :toast: I wonder if Drudge will run that one? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Oh. My. GOD.
That one made my night. Wow, but that was funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudmouth_liberal Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. we should scream from the mountain tops!!!!!
the sad thing is that the networks, and news channels wont pay any attention to this. the media protects bush to a certain degree, and never raises any serious doubts about the competency of him or his administration. Rumsfeld and Bush lied and screwd us over, why are we surprised.
Also, rumsfeild has never been able to answer a question on his feet, he was bound eventually to expose himself as a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. MSNBC just ran a tape of Rumsfeld denying
...(last summer) that our ground forces in Iraq were confronted by a guerilla war. The reporter quoted the definition right out of an Army manual and Rumsfeld denied it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, Donald,
if you're going to lie, at least do it with some dignity. Don't insult us like this.

Don't just sit there and stammer and stutter. At least give the lies some rehearsal, for God's sake. Do you just show up at these talk shows "cold", not knowing what on earth is going to be said?

Do it with some bravado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Check out the lie later on in the answer:
"He--he didn't say, 'Come in and look and see what we have.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Get that man some Prozac, make it a double..no, triple it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoupdEtat2000 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
20. Unbelieveable that he hangs on to this crap. What we might know later shit
I can't beleive there are people still buying this tripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
26. Watching the tape.He is a fiend.Ghoul.Monster.Ogre.Vampire.He is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. vampire? reminds me of an old song...
Are you a vampire Melvin Laird?
Are you a vampire?
Are you caught in the transylvanian transvestite timetrap Melvin Laird?
Honk honk go the geese of Canada
Quack quack go the ducks of derision............
(Ed Sanders, The ABM Machine, Sanders Truckstop)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Bloodsuckertaries of Defense.Damn thought it was a guy that owned a
truckstop til I googled Sanders Truckstop,Ed Sanders http://home.datacomm.ch/mik/ba/s/sanders_ed/ he should be better known than them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdeca Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. I knew...
I knew he was lying because his mouth was open!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. ..saw it....unbelievable!...he's completely shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvgwinn Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. confused?
When someone dosen't want to give a honest answer, double talk is usually used. He dosen't do it well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Ever wonder why he's careful to try to deny saying "imminent"?
They lied the whole way, made the whole thing up, sent thousands to their death in an illegal war, but they're hung up on semantics. With their case for war, one word didn't make the difference, yet this is the second time I've hear Scumfeld directly deny using the word. Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC