Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former U-Tenn. student guilty of hacking Palin's e-mail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:22 PM
Original message
Former U-Tenn. student guilty of hacking Palin's e-mail
Source: USAtoday

Kernell was found guilty of felony destruction of records to hamper a federal investigation and of misdemeanor unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer. He was acquitted of wire fraud, and jurors are deadlocked on felony identify theft.

Read more: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/04/former-univ-of-tenn-student-guilty-of-hacking-palins-emails/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can he join the army to stay out of jail?
Sister Sarah should be good with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You're 20 years behind the times
The army would never take him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. They took Palin's oldest.
And the Army is so strapped for recruits they're taking ex-convicts.

Scary thought for anyone whose young son/daughter is thinking of enlisting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. So - three years after the alleged crime
Track Palin joins the Army. That's a pretty big gap don't you think? And you really believe that juvenile courts can force a child to join the military? I don't think so.

Oh, and by the way, it is against against military regulations:

The Army addresses this issue in the Army Recruiting Regulation, Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 4-8b: "Applicant who, as a condition for any civil conviction or adverse disposition or any other reason through a civil or criminal court, is ordered or subjected to a sentence that implies or imposes enlistment into the Armed Forces of the United States is not eligible for enlistment.."

The Air Force Recruiting Regulation, AETCI 36-2002, table 1-1, lines 7 and 8, makes an applicant ineligible for enlistment if they are "released from restraint, or civil suit, or charges on the condition of entering military service, if the restraint, civil suit, or criminal charges would be reinstated if the applicant does not enter military service."

The Marine Corps Recruiting Regulation, MCO P1100.72B, Chapter 3, Section 2, Part H, Paragraph 12 states: "Applicants may not enlist as an alternative to criminal prosecution, indictment, incarceration, parole, probation, or other punitive sentence. They are ineligible for enlistment until the original assigned sentence would have been completed."


http://www.army.mil/-news/2009/10/14/28745-army-meets-recruiting-goals-for-quantity-quality/

and this:

A New York judge gave Michael Guerra the chance to join the Army to avoid a jail sentence. On those terms, the Army doesn’t want him. When Guerra’s attorney told the judge in the case that his client wanted to join the military, the judge gave Guerra a choice, Murphy said.

But Army regulations say that people facing pending charges are ineligible to enlist, said Army spokesman Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty.

“Army policy reflected in Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 4-32a states ‘waiver is not authorized if a criminal or juvenile court charge is pending or if such a charge was dismissed or dropped at any stage of the court proceedings on condition that the offender enlists in a military service,’ ” Hilferty said in an e-mail response to questions.

Army recruiters are also banned from helping someone get out of pending charges by joining the Army, Hilferty said.


http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=33904&archive=true

And the military is not hurting for recruits - they actually had their best year in history in both numbers and quality. They are not taking ex-convicts - that is an internet myth.

The Army and other services met their recruiting goals in fiscal year 2009, many exceeding both numeric goals and quality benchmarks for new recruits.

"We are pleased to report that for the first time, since the advent of the all-volunteer force, all of the military components -- active and reserve -- met their number as well as their quality goals," said Bill Carr, the deputy under secretary of Defense for military personnel policy during an Oct. 13 press conference at the Pentagon. "That's the first time that's been achieved for every component since the start of the all-volunteer force in 1973."

All branches of the service, as well as their respective Guard and Reserve components, met or exceeded recruiting numbers for the period between Oct. 1, 2008 and Sept. 30, 2009. For the active Army, that meant 70,045 accessions in that time period -- or 108 percent of its goal of 65,000 new Soldiers.
The "quality" component of last year's recruiting success refers to both the education level of new recruits and their performance on the Armed Forces Qualification Test, a subset of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, or ASVAB.

The Department of Defense set a benchmark for services, stating that 90 percent or greater of new recruits should have a high-school diploma. Last year, some 95 percent of Army active-duty recruits had a high-school diploma or greater. The reserve components of the Army also exceeded that standard.

Additionally, in FY 2009, 66 percent of new Soldiers in the Army scored at the 50th percentile or higher on the AFQT -- the DoD benchmark being 60 percent. Again, both reserve components, like the active Army, exceeded that goal.


http://www.army.mil/-news/2009/10/14/28745-army-meets-recruiting-goals-for-quantity-quality/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xsquid Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Exactly, even those with a GED need a waiver to get in.
Edited on Sat May-01-10 09:41 PM by xsquid
Enlisting with a GED
The Army is not accepting people with a GED in most areas of the country, however, the Army reserves the right to waive certain disqualifications and allow enlistment if deemed in the best interest of the individual and the service. If you will only need a waiver for the GED, it is highly likely that you will be accepted. Please note that when the Army did accept a GED, they were required to score at least 50 on the ASVAB.

There are some drawbacks to enlisting with a GED, such as not being eligible for bonuses. If you have 15 college credit hours under your belt, you will be eligible for bonuses. Also, upon reaching 30 college semester hours, no waiver is needed for the GED.


http://www.us-army-info.com/pages/enlist.html#ged

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xsquid Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. More than twenty years, I spent 12 years in starting just before the
end of vietnam and that could not be done then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Terrible misjudgement by Kernell.
He should get community service for the 'crimes.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. It's always the coverup that get folks in trouble
The email hacking is a minor charge, but obstruction of justice is much more serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. his handy work revealed,allegedly, that Palin had emailed that Blacks were genetically inferior..
she has recently expressed deep regret that she had said that.. according to the news i saw today on TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Real Sorry
Sorry she got caught like all republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. No kidding?
I don't watch M$M but that comment should be plastered all over and I've only read about it just now from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. you are confusing palin's emails with the email sent by the Harvard Law student
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Palin had emailed that Blacks were genetically inferior
Sounds like "Presidential Timber"

</Sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You're confused - she never did that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. His sentence will be....
one month to watch Fox news, with no guns or razor blades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergie321 Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I thought Obama
Reinstated the 8th Amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That would violate 8th Amendment
Cruel and unusual punishment I tell you!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Amazing hypocrisy
What happened to that repig wannabe pimp who lied about ACORN? He was caught trying to wiretap a US Senator!

Oh, wait a minute. He's a repig. Laws & rules are for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. lost in all of this is the fact that she was using a private email addy to conduct state business..
reminds me of the dan rather/bush TANG incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Stupidity is not a crime - hacking is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC