Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP engineer's testimony contradicted by e-mail released by congressional investigators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 08:47 AM
Original message
BP engineer's testimony contradicted by e-mail released by congressional investigators
Source: NOLA

BP engineer's testimony contradicted by e-mail released by congressional investigators
Published: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 10:30 PM Updated: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 8:36 AM
David Hammer, The Times-Picayune David Hammer, The Times-Picayune


Last month, Mark Hafle, BP's senior drilling engineer for the oil well that's now spewing millions of gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico, testified in Kenner that he and his team believed they had worked in concert with a contractor to come up with the safest possible design for encasing the well with cement and steel tubing so that "all the concerns had been addressed."

But now, e-mail messages released by congressional investigators paint a different picture of Hafle's confidence in the troubled well.

They show Hafle expressed concerns in the week before the April 20 disaster on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, calling the Macondo well 5,000 feet below that rig "a crazy well."

And contrary to Hafle's testimony that his team worked with the cementing contractor, Halliburton, to analyze models and design a plan "to give us the best chance to have a successful cement job," the internal e-mail messages now show that BP actually rejected a safer plan that required installing more components because, as well team leader John Guide wrote on April 16, "it will take 10 hours to install them."



Read more: http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/bp_engineers_testimony_contrad.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, 10 hours AND $10 million saved. That means...
...THEY DESTROYED THE GULF OF MEXICO TO GIVE THEIR STOCKHOLDERS ANOTHER 2 CENTS A SHARE!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It would be less than 2 cents per share
If they had to take the additional $10 million expense, they likely could have deducted that from their taxable earnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then throw his ass in jail.
Until this nation starts treating corporate criminals like criminals, this shit will never stop.

HOLD. HIM. ACCOUNTABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1 here we have some actual people with actual asses to kick---DO IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. 'Him' who?
Guide, or others, those pressuring him to speed things up? We really should think this thru to be certain we're 'after' the correct culprits, NOT the 'workers,' imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I read about these mails several days ago.
I realize investigations still need to be conducted but it seems to me that these mails pretty well prove willful negligence and malfeasance on BPs part and maybe others ( I can't remember all the emails well enough) so indict already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. How wide was the distribution list?
Because everyone who was on it should do time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. there was no mention of the distro list but the mail was directed to
BP HQ so............. I agree with you though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. From the start it's an insane well -- evidently the oil is under three states . . .
and because BP didn't want to pay royalties -- they drilled down diagonally to

the edge of the oil source --

As long as we allow the dollar bill to drive our values and decision making we are

behaving suicidally --

Nature is all --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Isn't that what Saddam Hussein did to Kuwait?
Which started the OTHER Gulf War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Never heard that -- wow!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC