Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Rep. Maxine Waters accused of three ethics violations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:28 PM
Original message
California Rep. Maxine Waters accused of three ethics violations
Source: Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Washington —
Even as Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California was warned by a colleague against interceding on behalf of a troubled bank with ties to her husband, her chief of staff, who also is her grandson, was "actively involved" in working to help the bank, according to a House Ethics Committee report released Monday that accuses the longtime Los Angeles political figure of three ethics violations.

Around the same time that Waters set up a September 2008 meeting between U.S. Treasury Department officials and representatives of minority-owned banks, her chief of staff, Mikael Moore, sent an e-mail to the staff of Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. According to the report, the subject of the e-mail was: "O U is in trouble.'"

Three months later, Boston-based OneUnited, with branches in Massachusetts, Florida and Los Angeles County, received $12 million in bailout funds.

If OneUnited had not received the aid from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Waters' husband's financial interest in the bank would have been worthless, according to the House Ethics Committee's 10-page statement of alleged violations.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-maxine-waters-20100810,0,6980293.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Think she'll cut a deal or go to trial?
"Unless a settlement is reached, Waters will face a trial, probably this fall, before an eight-member panel of fellow House members evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She'll cut a deal and end up being "censured"
Then go back to business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. And you thought no one would be punished for the banking frauds....
$12 million down, $699 billion, 988 million to go....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a load of horseshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like the same ole crap . . . I happen to be a fan of Maxine Waters . . .
Edited on Mon Aug-09-10 04:42 PM by defendandprotect
so guess there's a bias there -- but I don't see this as anything but

a restatement --

Let's start with reinvestigating ALL THE BANKS that got bail-outs . . .

In fact, let's go back and look at Silverado and the thefts and embezzlements of that

time which cost taxpayers near a trillion? Who knows how much it actually cost?


IMO, crimes of so many others have been brushed aside -- Stevens/Di Francesco??

Neal Bush -- gang that has tried to destroy Don Siegelman --

Not to mention the crimes of the FED in handling this bail out money!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. ditto
I agree with what you said....Silverado....for a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why
is Jane Harman getting a pass when it come to ethics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC