Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US backs Afghan plan to ditch security contractors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 05:27 AM
Original message
US backs Afghan plan to ditch security contractors
Source: AP

US backs Afghan plan to ditch security contractors
By HEIDI VOGT (AP) – 15 minutes ago

KABUL, Afghanistan — The U.S. military supports the Afghan government's plan to dissolve private security companies and is tightening oversight of its own armed contractors in the interim, an official said Monday.

~snip~

A presidential spokesman said last week a deadline to abolish private security contractors was imminent. In his inauguration speech in November, Karzai said he wanted to close down both foreign and domestic security contractors within two years.

As in Iraq, the conduct of security contractors in Afghanistan — particularly those working with U.S. forces — has been a source of tension, with complaints that they are poorly regulated and effectively operate outside local law.

"Certainly we understand President Karzai's statements that he is determined to dissolve private security companies. We are committed to partnering with the government in meeting that intent," said Brig. Gen. Margaret Boor, head of a new task force to better regulate and oversee private security operations. The group, called Task Force Spotlight, started work in June.



Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iNFTCCDUQmsI1SV67vO0WCd8EcOwD9HKGTBO0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R According to this report, "as of March 2010, there were 112,092 DOD contractors in Afghanistan"


"...as of March 2010, there were 112,092 DOD contractors in Afghanistan, compared to approximately 79,100 uniformed personnel. Contractors made up 59% of DOD’s workforce in Afghanistan. In December 2008, contractors represented 69% of DOD’s workforce in Afghanistan, which apparently represented the highest recorded percentage of contractors used by DOD in any conflict in the history of the United States." http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40764.pdf">Department of Defense Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Background and Analysis (PDF), Congressional Research Service, July 2010



From: http://www.afghanconflictmonitor.org/securityforces.html#docs3


How much money is that going to save?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The fuckers can afford to fund this stuff but they can't repair America?
They want to put the retirement age up to 70 so they can afford to accommodate the neoCon's private war machine. Fighting wars take troops and our smart leaders in the distant past knew if you were going to fight wars you had to draft soldiers. This type of covering the political cowards ass in Washington needs to stop. If we're going to war have the balls to start up the draft boards. It's not fair to the taxpayers and it's sure as hell not fair the the troops who wear the uniform and who make a fraction of what those killers for hire make.

These high dollar Scab soldiers, are a product of the GOP/neoCON insanity! Worried about the deficit your ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYMdaveNYI Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. the day Blackwater (Xe) is out of business...
will be a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Overcoming a giant step in the wrong direction. Recommending.
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. " is tightening oversight of its own armed contractors in the interim, "
About damned time!

Imprisoning people for profit, warring for profit--what could possibly go wrong?


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC