Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Civilians to Take U.S. Lead After Military Leaves Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:10 PM
Original message
Civilians to Take U.S. Lead After Military Leaves Iraq
Source: NY Times

Published: August 18, 2010

WASHINGTON — As the United States military prepares to leave Iraq by the end of 2011, the Obama administration is planning a remarkable civilian effort, buttressed by a small army of contractors, to fill the void.
...

By October 2011, the State Department will assume responsibility for training the Iraqi police, a task that will largely be carried out by contractors. With no American soldiers to defuse sectarian tensions in northern Iraq, it will be up to American diplomats in two new $100 million outposts to head off potential confrontations between the Iraqi Army and Kurdish pesh merga forces.

To protect the civilians in a country that is still home to insurgents with Al Qaeda and Iranian-backed militias, the State Department is planning to more than double its private security guards, up to as many as 7,000, according to administration officials who disclosed new details of the plan.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/world/middleeast/19withdrawal.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "race to the top" of the war profiteers for cash pile. blackwater's wet dream nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm. doesn't this mean that Hillary is in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watajob Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, we withdraw soldiers ...
... at $35K @ year and replace them with mercenaries making $100K? What's this say about the Iraqi's "standing up"? And, I voted for this fool. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Its just Disgusting
Football season is about to bring its annual circus to the SHEEP,

THERE'S PLENTY OF BREAD STILL FOR MOST

Its amazing how the churches are still vacuuming the pockets of the lower class.

And patriotism has never been higher.

USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA

</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rome was more Respectful.
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 03:40 AM by TheWatcher
It is utterly unbelievable the Delusional, Weak, Soft, Brainwashed, Cowed, and utterly ignorant country we have become.

Rome was a Renaissance of Reason compared to this.

What else is there to say.

We Suck.

And we can't even be bothered to care.

Bret Favre demands our full and undivided attention.

Just a build a Roman Colosseum in every major Metropolitan City and be done with it.

We LIKE being Conquered.

It's almost like we fetishize it now.

Welcome To Hell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. With 50,000 'non-combat' troops remaining stationed there indefinitely, why does State need
as many as 14,000 'private security' forces?

Oh wait, change...
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't believe the 14000 'private security' forces' figure
Two years ago there were 190000 there :

As of early 2008, at least 190,000 private personnel were working on US-funded projects in the Iraq theater, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) survey found. That means that for each uniformed member of the US military in the region, there was also a contract employee – a ratio of 1 to 1.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2008/0818/p02s01-usmi.html

I'm sure they haven't retired and the majority remaining lurking there.

The 50000 are not totally non combat : of those 4000 are special forces. If the balance are non combat then how come they remain armed exactly as before in every single respect.

Not really change - just a fresh coat of paint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC