Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Camera's first catch gets felony drug charge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:00 AM
Original message
Camera's first catch gets felony drug charge
Edited on Tue Aug-12-03 09:10 AM by chiburb
Chicago recently installed a series of $80,000 remote-controlled cameras, mounted on light poles, in several high crime areas. This is their 1st bust:

Snip:

As Marcus D. Jackson smoked dope in a blue Chevy Caprice, he had no idea anyone was watching, police say.

But about a block away, officers were monitoring his every move on a surveillance camera set up at Augusta and Pulaski to target crimes both serious and minor that bring down the neighborhood's quality of life.

When they swooped in and arrested Jackson, the officers allegedly found $20 worth of pot and Ecstasy, a so-called "club drug," valued at $60.

Snip:

"He is nervous because he is on parole," she said. "He does not know what will happen when he goes back to court. This isn't fair. It's not like he was dealing drugs. I don't see how they could arrest him for just sitting there smoking weed. Most young people do that."

Jackson's mother has seen the cameras and does not like them. "To me, that is an invasion," she said.

Generally, though, the cameras don't violate the constitutional right to privacy if they're trained on public spaces, the American Civil Liberties Union says

Our tax dollars at work...

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-camera12.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. denmark is lookin better and better
highways are a honor system. No sherriffs lookin for speeders, rare speed signs. It is just understood. slow on the right. move over if someone is going faster. better drivers too. I saw NO cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Install them in other high-crime areas
Outside people's homes in gated communities, and in boardrooms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zizzer Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. funny...
here in MD they are getting installed IN the houses of people that live in gated communities...and people are getting in all kinds of trouble for snooping on their nannies private parts.

Fuck Big Brother...it's little brother and The Spies* that worry me.

Zizzer

* a vauge reference to 1984, G. Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Northwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. They tried the cameras in Texas
But the Texas Courts ruled that inside one's car was a private property, and hence protected under privacy laws.

The Texas legislature, never one to miss an opportunity, then declared that if cars were property, the assessed value of any car one owns would be included in one's property taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is tough ...
agree about the privacy issues ... BUT

What about the case where a child disappears, and a video tape provides enough information (quickly) to identify and even locate the the child / abductor.

In this particular case, this guy was smoking weed in a car on a public street. He is breaking the law. I could care less that he is smoking weed. The point is that he is smoking weed while operating a vehicle (or he intended to) on a public street where his actions could harm others (like driving drunk).

If he was in his own living room and a camera caught him pulling off a bong, then I agree that the cameras are an invasion of privacy.

To me this is hardly a black and white issue.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cameras AREN'T a bad idea when....
They are monitoring an area to ensure real crimes such as robbery, rape, etc. are happening and being used to help prevent and solve thes types of crimes

They shouldn't be used for crap like this, even though the guy shouldn't be sitting out somewhere public smoking the stuff in the first place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree
As the poster above mentioned we have two types of camera placement. When placed in the wealthy, gated communities, the purpose is to prevent crime and protect the residents - you know, the guys with friends at city hall and the folks who pay lottsa city taxes. When you place cameras in the inner city its a crack down on the residents.

If a gated community guy was observed on camera doing blow or smoking a joint in his BMW the police would make a copy for him and give to him next Tuesday when they all get together to play poker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Crap like this"?
The goal is to discourage "off-duty criminals" like Jackson from committing more serious offenses than smoking pot, police said. Jackson, 22, was on parole for drug dealing and possession of a stolen vehicle. The 5-foot-tall man, known as "Shorty," admitted he was a Four Corner Hustlers gang member, police said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I forgot to mention...
That this was THE front page story in our Hollinger rag this morning (Chicago SunTimes, print edition).
As for privacy, tax dollars, etc., I would think the CPD would wait for a REAL crime solved or interrupted. $20 of weed, $60 of Ex? I wouldn't be calling a press conference over that. Unless the point was to announce a new Zero Tolerance policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds like one for the good guys.............read the entire article
The unit swarmed into the area at the beginning of August and in a week recovered 11 guns, impounded 87 vehicles and made 284 arrests on charges ranging from gun possession to car theft.

The goal is to discourage "off-duty criminals" like Jackson from committing more serious offenses than smoking pot, police said. Jackson, 22, was on parole for drug dealing and possession of a stolen vehicle. The 5-foot-tall man, known as "Shorty," admitted he was a Four Corner Hustlers gang member, police said.

So much for the portayal of this man as just a good son who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. He is a car thieving drug dealer out on parole making the least of a second, or even third, chance.

IN A WEEK they took 11 guns out of the hands of criminals and off the streets.


I have personally taken the risk of running drug dealer out of my neighborhood. As they get bolder they hang around and do drugs in public. I have seen the effects.... a decline in property value, unsafe environment for my children to play and even used hypo kits tossed inside my dogs kennel. This isn't about busting four friends who drink and smoke playing cards on the front porch.


Do the footwork. They said 284 arrests. Instead of hypotheticals find out what the arrests were and how much of that activity do you want in your nieghborhood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC