Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Cites Hussein's Potential Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:50 PM
Original message
Bush Cites Hussein's Potential Weapons
Officials Echo Draft Of Iraq Survey Group

By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 18, 2004; Page A03

President Bush and other senior administration officials yesterday defended their decision to invade Iraq despite errors in prewar intelligence, echoing findings in a draft report by the top U.S. weapons inspector, who concludes that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction but hoped to someday reconstitute programs to develop them.

"We didn't find the stockpiles we thought would be there -- that we all thought would be there," Bush said at a campaign rally in Washington. "But Saddam Hussein had the capability of making weapons, and he could have passed that capability on to the enemy. And that is a risk we could not afford to take after September 11, 2001. Knowing what I know today, I would have made the same decision."

The 1,300-page draft report by Charles Duelfer, the CIA's top adviser on Iraqi weapons and the leader of the Iraq Survey Group, has been reviewed by acting CIA Director John E. McLaughlin, according to one U.S. intelligence official. McLaughlin asked the team to answer questions not addressed in the report and has sent it back for further work. The official said the team has thousands of boxes of documents that it has yet to read, so changes are possible. The draft conclusion of Hussein's intent was based largely on documents written by senior Iraqi leaders and on interviews with former Iraqi scientists and top officials, the official said.

U.S. officials familiar with the classified draft report, whose contents were first reported by the Associated Press Thursday night, said it broadly mirrors the findings of Duelfer's predecessor, David Kay. He told the Senate Armed Services Committee in January that the U.S. intelligence community was "all wrong" in concluding Iraq possessed banned weapons, a finding that the administration had used as a primary public justification for the invasion.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29996-2004Sep17.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Man, I knew these creeps would be all over this "dormant weapon program"..
crap line.

Someday we can only hope these criminals are brought to justice for their crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kitsune cites B*sh's potential brain *nt*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Changes are possible"
McLaughlin asked the team to answer questions not addressed in the report and has sent it back for further work. The official said the team has thousands of boxes of documents that it has yet to read, so changes are possible.

Yeah, as soon as CHENEY makes them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Out of what? Sewer pipe?
You couldn't even make a good cannon out of the materials they've been proposing as WMD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Those conservatives sure like their 'potentials'.
'Potential' weapons. I like how CNN spun the story about there being absolutely no WMD's in Iraq. Oh, but Saddam Hussein was 'thinking' about a weapons program. He could 'potentially' have made dangerous weapons. I suppose that is enough to massacre a people over and send more than 1,000 men and women to their untimely deaths for.

And then there's the 'potential' humans (i.e. 'fetuses') so revered by right wingers. In the meantime, real human beings are dying, real children are flooding social services and real people with families to support are standing behind the wealthiest 2% when it comes to their share of the public treasury. Somebody needs to shake the 'pubs out of their self-induced oblivion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Linking Saddam Hussein and 9/11, as usual
So Bush would have still invaded if he knew what he knows now. Do you think ANYONE would have supported him? Besides Cheney and Chalibi, that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. We hold our children to higher standards than this,...
,...bullshit. Bottom line: Did the country of Iraq threaten our country?

Bottom line: Iraq was the easiest wealth-producing (oil) country to defeat per (not only billions of tax-payer supported intelligence) the neocon assessment towards their NWO,...which NO American or other citizen would approve,....hence,...

THEY DECEIVED AND MANIPULATED THE GOOD-WILL OF HUMANITY,...in order to serve their megalomaniac evil weaknesses.

They deserve a prolonged suffering and I, for one, will not wait for them to admit their "sins" before they die. I am way too busy trying to compensate!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. The report said he had no capacity to make WMD!
All he had were dormant programs he hoped to revive someday!

Can you tell me why we had to invade in a big fricking hurry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. What should be done with potential liars?
Tell us, Georgie, and seal your own fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. That does it! I am making a preemptive strike on my neighbor. He
bought a bag of nitrogen fertilizer and with that can of fuel he keeps in his shed he has a potential bomb. No way am I going to wait until there is a mushroom cloud where my house used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Without this bush's case for war doesn't exist
He now says he would have done it anyway. Which is what he really did do. However, nobody would have go along with it. This should be enough to at least impeach the bastard. I'm afraid however, that this will happen only after another couple of years of the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. There is no point in hearing anything he says
Its all lies. all lies. lies.
This is all he has to prop up a criminal folly of gigantic proportions.
We've been stampeded, robbed and hoodwinked.
I look forward to when this second rate dick-tater is held accountalbe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. DON'T buy or argue with the "stockpiles" thing
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 12:03 AM by shockingelk
That's letting them frame the issue.

The real argument for war with Iraq was that they were constantly building more WMD including nuclear bombs and they must be stopped.

It was not about what happened to materials that existed in 1991, it was about nuclear bombs being built in 2003. Here is a PHOTO of a "CURRENTLY ACTIVE" alleged uranium refinery:

... more here http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2002/g021008-D-6570C.html transcript of briefing: http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2002/t10082002_t1008dia.html

This "stockpiles" stuff is a lie on top of a lie on top of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Wow, Iran is practicing the same kind of nasty deception
What a coincidence! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Lying SOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. bush's digestive system operates in reverse. it's just like being behind
a cow when a pie is being delivered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. So when do we go after
Iran
Pakistan
India
Israel
North Korea
France
Germany
China
Russia
England
Many more...

Afterall, these countries could also give nuclear secrets to anyone they want to have them. If this is the NEW standard then we better start drafting people for WW III, and soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. "Memo sent back for further work"
Sounds like the Kean Commission Report.

"Get back to me after November."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. Any country in the world has a potential of making WMD's, if they
have a water treatment plant and have Chlorine you could say that. Hell I have some Clorox and Drano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. We all have the potential
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 10:34 AM by screembloodymurder
to choose reconcilliation not revenge, peace not war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. air WMDs....
(Makes gun with fingers) Pshewww, Pshewww! Gotcha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC