Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek/Isikoff: Gonzales: Did He Help Bush Keep His DUI Quiet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:01 PM
Original message
Newsweek/Isikoff: Gonzales: Did He Help Bush Keep His DUI Quiet?
Jan. 31 issue - Senate Democrats put off a vote on White House counsel Alberto Gonzales's nomination to be attorney general, complaining he had provided evasive answers to questions about torture and the mistreatment of prisoners. But Gonzales's most surprising answer may have come on a different subject: his role in helping President Bush escape jury duty in a drunken-driving case involving a dancer at an Austin strip club in 1996. The judge and other lawyers in the case last week disputed a written account of the matter provided by Gonzales to the Senate Judiciary Committee. "It's a complete misrepresentation," said David Wahlberg, lawyer for the dancer, about Gonzales's account.

Bush's summons to serve as a juror in the drunken-driving case was, in retrospect, a fateful moment in his political career: by getting excused from jury duty he was able to avoid questions that would have required him to disclose his own 1976 arrest and conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in Kennebunkport, Maine—an incident that didn't become public until the closing days of the 2000 campaign. (Bush, who had publicly declared his willingness to serve, had left blank on his jury questionnaire whether he had ever been "accused" in a criminal case.) Asked by Sen. Patrick Leahy to describe "in detail" the only court appearance he ever made on behalf of Bush, Gonzales—who was then chief counsel to the Texas governor—wrote that he had accompanied Bush the day he went to court "prepared to serve on a jury." While there, Gonzales wrote, he "observed" the defense lawyer make a motion to strike Bush from the jury panel "to which the prosecutor did not object." Asked by the judge whether he had "any views on this," Gonzales recalled, he said he did not.

While Gonzales's account tracks with the official court transcript, it leaves out a key part of what happened that day, according to Travis County Judge David Crain. In separate interviews, Crain—along with Wahlberg and prosecutor John Lastovica—told NEWSWEEK that, before the case began, Gonzales asked to have an off-the-record conference in the judge's chambers.

(snip) … Wahlberg said he agreed to make the motion striking Bush because he didn't want the hard-line governor on his jury anyway. But there was little doubt among the participants as to what was going on. "In public, they were making a big show of how he was prepared to serve," said Crain. "In the back room, they were trying to get him off."

more…
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6857224/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broadslidin Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So What.......! Not everyone lives on this forum.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Well it is a duplicate.
This one will get locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. First I've seen of it - Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ummm, Mr. Gonzales, do you know the penalty for lying to
members of Congress? :shrug: I just wish someone, anyone would have the stones to ask him that and ask that he be charged with at least this one crime. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Perjurer: another tick on his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryban Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. First I saw of it, too. Thanks for posting.
It brought this Florida tort reform proposal to mind. Look at the last line:

. . . The Associated Industries of Florida, sent to the Florida legislature a massive (111-page) proposed revision to Florida's tort system which would abolish punitive damages, cap attorney fees and noneconomic damages in all tort cases and grant immunity from malpractice lawsuits to emergency room doctors. Other provisions of the legislation would repeal the Sunshine in Litigation Act, which bars state court judges from sealing judgments that conceal public hazards, further cap damages in patient abuse and neglect lawsuits against nursing homes and allow jail time for those who duck jury duty. . . .

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/healthlawprof_blog/2005/01/florida_busines.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. In hindsight, it's probably good * wasn't on that jury ...
He'd have probably voted for the death penalty for the poor woman.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Could this be the lighting of the fuse?
Political scandals have a way of starting with largely innocuous stories about largely unimportant issues. In this case, Chimpus Khan's DUI (now a known and undisputed fact) is the largely unimportant issue. The story of Gonzo's running interference for his boss is the innocuous story. The ducking of full disclosure to the Senate is the start of the scandal. From this could well come a whole host of things.

It isn't going to get King Khan out of office, but it could be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If it keeps Gonzales out of AG's office, not only could it be fun to
watch, it could be very productive! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I sincerely hope this is the lighting of the fuse.
Also, I would like this article to get more publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey Sissy Issy, why were YOU silent in 2000 about this?
I guess you were still counting the $600,000 you got from Scaife for going after Bill Clinton's Penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. "In public, they were making a big show..." just like his antigay campaign
After the Christian rightwingers came out and voted, then Bush says he no intention of pushing a gay marriage amendment as he said he would BEFORE they voted. It was ALL for show.

Same with abortion. Bush doesn't WANT abortion to be made illegal. His wife, mother and daughters are prochoice, and his spokespeople are very careful to say he does not want abortion to be illegal.

The rightwingers are SUCH dupes. Would they have voted for Bush if they knew the ONLY priority he has is to push this country into MORE wars? To strip this country of its goodwill and social programs while installing fascism as the new ruling philosophy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It doesn't matter to them
The sad truth is we have 59 million pinheads in this country brainwashed by Jesus into thinking that they are gonna get raptured any day now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC