Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Admin. Rejects GOA's Ruling on 'Covert Propaganda'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:27 AM
Original message
Bush Admin. Rejects GOA's Ruling on 'Covert Propaganda'
Administration Rejects Ruling On PR Videos

GAO Called Tapes Illegal Propaganda

The Bush administration, rejecting an opinion from the Government Accountability Office, said last week that it is legal for federal agencies to feed TV stations prepackaged news stories that do not disclose the government's role in producing them.

That message, in memos sent Friday to federal agency heads and general counsels, contradicts a Feb. 17 memo from Comptroller General David M. Walker. Walker wrote that such stories -- designed to resemble independently reported broadcast news stories so that TV stations can run them without editing -- violate provisions in annual appropriations laws that ban covert propaganda.

But Joshua B. Bolten, director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Steven G. Bradbury, principal deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department, said in memos last week that the administration disagrees with the GAO's ruling. And, in any case, they wrote, the department's Office of Legal Counsel, not the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, provides binding legal interpretations for federal agencies to follow.

The legal counsel's office "does not agree with GAO that the covert propaganda prohibition applies simply because an agency's role in producing and disseminating information is undisclosed or 'covert,' regardless of whether the content of the message is 'propaganda,' " Bradbury wrote. "Our view is that the prohibition does not apply where there is no advocacy of a particular viewpoint, and therefore it does not apply to the legitimate provision of information concerning the programs administered by an agency."

more@link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is just how bold November made this fascist pigs
They think that now they can and will do anything they desire.
They own the media, they own the agencies and they will soon own the courts.
We are so fucked in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. "It's like a new watergate every day with these people"
I forget who said that, but it's so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goathead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. The government doing prepackaged news stories is a wonderful idea
The Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told me so:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. That Would Be "Justice Department" of....
....the Inquisitor General?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. They always release, uh, UN-positive memos and info on Friday--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. "The prohibition does not apply where there is no advocacy
of a particular viewpoint"??? How can they claim that their faux news meets that criteria, when it's all slanted to bring the American people to their way of thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. clip about that from the NYTimes story:
"Few stations acknowledge the military's role in the segments. ''Just tune in and you'll see a minute-and-a-half news piece and it looks just like they went out and did the story,'' Mr. Gilliam said. The unit, though, makes no attempt to advance any particular political or policy agenda, he said.

''We don't editorialize at all,'' he said.

Yet sometimes the ''good news'' approach carries political meaning, intended or not. Such was the case after the Abu Ghraib prison scandal surfaced last spring. Although White House officials depicted the abuse of Iraqi detainees as the work of a few rogue soldiers, the case raised serious questions about the training of military police officers.

A short while later, Mr. Gilliam's unit distributed a news segment, sent to 34 stations, that examined the training of prison guards at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri, where some of the military police officers implicated at Abu Ghraib had been trained.

''One of the most important lessons they learn is to treat prisoners strictly but fairly,'' the reporter said in the segment, which depicted a regimen emphasizing respect for detainees. A trainer told the reporter that military police officers were taught to ''treat others as they would want to be treated.'' The account made no mention of Abu Ghraib or how the scandal had prompted changes in training at Fort Leonard Wood."

----

"Everything is wonderful in Iraq" seems to be message of these things.

War is Peace

etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dear God in heaven. Imperial Amerika is now indistunguishable
from Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, in this matter.

Government Propaganda is OK, even if it is covert and pretending to be...say...SOVIET PRAVDA? NAZI DER STURMER?

It is with the greatest sadness that I say that I am not surprised in the least.

No, check that. This actually did surprise me just a little bit because of the openness of the Soviet attitudes.

Yes, these Totalitarian Monsters feel empowered and the people of Imperial Amerika are to them as toilet paper is to my rectum.

Sad. Disgusted. Words simply cannot do justice to the level of disgrace Imperial Amerika has heaped on itself and it's Imperial Subjects.

And the disgust at which we all take it with a smile is...well...let us just say that Amerikans have NOTHING in common with Americans.

Not a damned thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's time we the people came to grips with the fact that GWB can do what--
ever he likes or wants whenever he wants or likes. Haven't the Congress and Supreme Court really become just so much window dressing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC