Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sideshows on Iran's frogmarch to the UN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 10:04 AM
Original message
Sideshows on Iran's frogmarch to the UN
Early last week, Europe instantly rejected, without pause for breath, an Iranian offer of a two-year moratorium on uranium enrichment, thus setting its seal on a major international crisis.

Iran's "six-point" proposal was submitted by the Iranian delegation headed by Javad Veidi to the EU-3 (Germany, France and Britain) in Brussels on January 30. Instead of giving it careful consideration, the EU-3 diplomats rejected it as old news, devoid of anything new, and then, rather disingenuously, went on to blame Iran for "lack of progress".

---

These diplomats, so adept at "leaking" their own highly-publicized proposal to Iran last summer, kept a tight lid on Iran's proposal and, what is more, there is no evidence that any respected member of the Western media made any attempt to get their hands on Iran's proposal.

That aside, the following is the nub of Iran's six-point proposal:
# Iran pledges that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, not nuclear bombs.
# Iran pledges that it will get the legislative approval in its majlis (parliament) of the Additional Protocol to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and will continue with IAEA inspections.
# Iran pledges to stay within the NPT.
# Iran pledges that it will not resume enrichment prior to the next IAEA meeting.
# Iran pledges that its nuclear research will be under monitoring by the IAEA.
# Iran will continue negotiating with the EU-3 regarding enrichment issues for two years, and after two years, if the negotiations fail, will resume enrichment activities.

Asia Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I find it remarkable (and quite insane)
That a signatory nation under the NNPA, with the expressed GUARANTEED RIGHT to pursue a peaceful nuclear energy program is being scapegoated like this.

It'a quite amazing that everyone forgets that Israel NEVER signed the NNPA and possesses between 200 and 500 nuclear armaments, in DIRECT VIOLATION of COUNTLESS UN resolutions. Iran has not attacked Israel. Israel HAS attacked Iran, however, MANY TIMES.

Curiouser and curiouser.

I hate waiting for this war. I hate the lies, the hyperbolic rhetoric, the mendacious hypocrisy and the corporate media morons CONSTANTLY bullshitting about Ahmedinajad, Iran, the IAEA and the UN.

The USA / Israel coalition IS GOING TO WAR with Iran, so why don't they JUST DO IT and get it the fuck over with. Who the fuck in their right mind believes the back story (especially after 9-11, Afghanistan Iraq), anyway???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not sure we are going to war.
We are definitely working on fabricating a new global threat, after all Iraq just won't do for that at this point, but that can serve many purposes, esp. domestic political ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC