Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What people are saying about the hunting accident:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:41 PM
Original message
What people are saying about the hunting accident:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20060217/cm_usatoday/cheneyaccidentdrawsunfriendlyfire;_ylt=Ap35hrRbnGIb95bSPhnDOIWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3YWFzYnA2BHNlYwM3NDI-
Cheney accident draws unfriendly fire

Fri Feb 17, 6:59 AM ET

What people are saying about the hunting accident:


Las Vegas Review-Journal, in an editorial: "The behavior of the attack dogs of the Washington press corps in response to this news ... confirmed many of the worst impressions of that profession long held among those who live outside the Boston-to-Washington Amtrak corridor. 'Has the vice president resigned or is he planning to resign?' one reporter asked. 'Does the vice president plan to stop hunting?' Others compared the one-day delay before they were advised of the accident to famous coverups of the past. It was a weekend. Should the vice president have dialed the home numbers of various New York Times columnists before an ambulance was summoned? ... One component in the overreaction of the Washington press corps is doubtless attributable to the fact that few in that profession today any longer belong to a culture in which hunting and fishing are considered normal pastimes for adults. ... The impression the press corps gave was not that they were concerned for all involved. ... The scene more closely resembled a tank full of sharks smelling blood."

The Capital Times,

Madison, Wis., in an editorial: "Sure, it's been fun joking about the fact that Dick Cheney obtained ... five deferments to avoid serving in the military. ... Now that the vice president has accidentally shot and wounded a companion on a quail hunt at an elite Texas ranch where rich men play with guns, spraying his 78-year-old victim, er, friend, in the face and chest with shotgun pellets and sending the man to the intensive care unit of a Corpus Christi (Texas) hospital, it has become clear that Cheney was doing the country a service when he avoided service. ... U.S. troops had enough problems in Vietnam without letting a trigger-happy incompetent like Dick Cheney start shooting things up from behind the lines. Those deferments were well and wisely issued."

The Times,

Trenton, N.J., editorial: "The Bush administration and Vice President Dick Cheney's pals say Cheney wasn't to blame for accidentally shooting a quail-hunting companion in Texas Saturday afternoon. The fault, they say, lay with the victim, who, fortunately, was not gravely wounded, although he suffered what was described as a mild heart attack. But who's surprised? This administration, with its vice president calling the shots much of the time, has probably made more bad decisions than any White House team in U.S. history - and never admitted to any of them. It is one of the delicious ironies of the case that Cheney's pose as victim, not perpetrator, has been shot down by the very gun lobby to which this administration and its Republican allies in Congress have been subservient for five years."....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did Not Like The Vegas Editorial - The Others Rocked Though
I like these tidbits

it has become clear that Cheney was doing the country a service when he avoided service. ... U.S. troops had enough problems in Vietnam without letting a trigger-happy incompetent like Dick Cheney start shooting things up from behind the lines.

This administration, with its vice president calling the shots much of the time, has probably made more bad decisions than any White House team in U.S. history - and never admitted to any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, note how they try and change the subject
oooh... it's that darn 'liberal' media again. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC