"A Fetish of Candor" - Brooks in the NYT in another puff piece

[GCP]

for the squatter.
Read it and vomit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/13/opinion/13BROO.html

[Cocoa]

1. Bush is too honest

I'm speechless.

Why is this appearing in the NYT?

[Old and In the Way]

2. Nothing objective about his perspective.

He supports the Repubican cause irregardless of the facts.

He is an apologist of the 1st magnitude.

[buycitgo]

3. you're both right

also, mark shields called him on that "too honest" fatuousity last night on Lehrer, saying that he was giving the admin too much credit.

he said it was merely campaign season rhetoric, appealing to those who want red meat; those who want to see our unwilling non-coalitioners be humiliated, not allowed to share in the spoils of occupation

[The Zanti Regent]

4. Who still believes the SCREW YORK TIMES is a liberal paper?

With shit like this on the editorial page?

[AlabamaYankee]

5. Brooks is starting to sound like Maureen Dowd

He's become an oh-so-smart Upper West Side twit on the right to match MoDo on the left. "Smarmy" also comes to mind.

[The Zanti Regent]

7. You can tell the difference between Brooks and WHOREEN?

I can't!

[Manix]

6. Pure crap!!!!!

nt