Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Govt working for Hicks guilty verdict: Fraser (former PM)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:19 PM
Original message
Govt working for Hicks guilty verdict: Fraser (former PM)
Former prime minister Malcolm Fraser says the United States and Australian governments are working to ensure Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks is found guilty.

Mr Fraser has addressed eminent Australians, academics and teachers at a human rights education conference at the University of Melbourne.

He says the Howard Government has done nothing to stop the delays and torturous conditions at Guantanamo Bay.

"After five years of quite inhumane and degrading treatment, a verdict of innocence would be extraordinarily embarrassing to both governments, perhaps enough to defeat a government as more and more Australians really come to understand the nature of government's betrayal of the rights of an Australian citizen," he said.

"On this analysis, the United States cannot and clearly will not allow a fair trial."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1849401.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure Howard wishes Malcolm Fraser would just fade away.
It's hard to believe that this man, once so hated by Labor supporters, is now one of the good guys.

On Human Rights issues though, he is very much in the forefront, and puts Howard and his cohorts to
shame. Or he would if they had any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bear down under Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're right
but don't forget who Fraser's Treasurer was. And (with hindsight) much of what was wrong with the Fraser years was poor economic policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was thinking of The Dismissal.
It was a shabby affair - had Fraser waited just a little longer, Whitlam was going to be voted out
anyhow - there were just too many incompetents in his Cabinet.

But now he's closer to Whitlam than he is to Howard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC