Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A parent's right to decide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 05:47 AM
Original message
A parent's right to decide
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/commentary/wb/wb/xp-104782

...

If the history of medicine in the last century teaches us anything, it is that women's health remains a dimly understood topic. I have grown, I think, justifiably cautious when hearing that a new medicine promises to transform women's sexual and reproductive lives. I thank God that I have the perfect right to reflect on the facts, consult my personal values and make my own decisions about my body. I want my daughter and granddaughters to enjoy that same right. Truth is, both the incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer have fallen approximately 50 percent in the last 30 years. Safer sexual practices and routine Pap tests, which can be largely credited for this decrease, will remain our most important weapons. That's because the new vaccine is not universally effective against the full spectrum of agents that produce cancer. ...

Mind you, these were my objections before we learned that the current race to vaccinate is being bankrolled by the makers of Gardasil. The Associated Press reported recently that Merck & Co. has donated millions of dollars to state candidates and political action committees. At present, 18 states are debating the merits of having all girls vaccinated before the sixth grade. In Virginia, there are two bills moving through the General Assembly, and Gov. Tim Kaine has already expressed his support.

HPV, in addition to producing genital warts, has been implicated in penile cancer. If state-mandated vaccination is about protecting the public health and not about rushing Merck's new product to the gate before competitor GlaxoSmithKline has its own vaccine on the market, why not commit our resources to ensuring that the product be further tested and approved for both genders?

Merck & Co. can hardly afford another failure like that of its pain reliever Vioxx; and neither, I would argue, can we. To date, there have been more than 10,000 cases and 190 class actions filed against the company over issues ranging from data manipulation to the adequacy of its warnings about adverse cardiovascular events associated with the drug. And so, dear daughter, here is my response: Everyone does not wear pajama bottoms to school, and Everyone is not getting in line for Gardasil. Everyone must choose for herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. THANK YOU, for a bit of reason.
I got my kids off the push to vaccinate bandwagon years ago when Merck pushed the Chix Pox vaccine on everyone. From a medical standpoint, a wholly unnecessary vaccine and one that may in fact cause a child harm down the road.

Merck made $7 mil. per class of kids entering kindergarten in the state of OH with the CHix Pox vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a take on the situation that
I have not considered. Thanks for bringing it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick for your right to decide. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kickin it! And a recommendation to boot.
:toast:

I applaud your vigorous stance for choice mhatrw! :applause:

The Associated Press reported recently that Merck & Co. has donated millions of dollars to state candidates and political action committees. At present, 18 states are debating the merits of having all girls vaccinated before the sixth grade. In Virginia, there are two bills moving through the General Assembly, and Gov. Tim Kaine has already expressed his support.

HPV, in addition to producing genital warts, has been implicated in penile cancer. If state-mandated vaccination is about protecting the public health and not about rushing Merck's new product to the gate before competitor GlaxoSmithKline has its own vaccine on the market, why not commit our resources to ensuring that the product be further tested and approved for both genders?

Merck & Co. can hardly afford another failure like that of its pain reliever Vioxx; and neither, I would argue, can we. To date, there have been more than 10,000 cases and 190 class actions filed against the company over issues ranging from data manipulation to the adequacy of its warnings about adverse cardiovascular events associated with the drug.


Anyone who says that Vioxx is not related to Gardasil should consider the letters in bold above. This company has a history of MANIPULATING DATA and people here are defending Merck as though they're on the payroll along with politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks, mhatrw! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC