Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new science of happiness needs some historical perspective - Scientific American

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 02:34 PM
Original message
The new science of happiness needs some historical perspective - Scientific American
February 18, 2007
(Can't Get No) Satisfaction
The new science of happiness needs some historical perspective
By Michael Shermer
The Scientific American



"Imagine you have a choice between earning $50,000 a year while other people make $25,000 or earning $100,000 a year while other people get $250,000. Prices of goods and services are the same. Which would you prefer? Surprisingly, studies show that the majority of people select the first option. As H. L. Mencken is said to have quipped, "A wealthy man is one who earns $100 a year more than his wife's sister's husband."
This seemingly illogical preference is just one of the puzzles that science is trying to solve about why happiness can be so elusive in today's world. Several recent books by researchers address the topic, but my skeptic's eye found a historian's long-view analysis to be ultimately the most enlightening.

Consider a paradox outlined by London School of Economics economist Richard Lay­ard in Happiness (Penguin, 2005), in which he shows that we are no happier even though average incomes have more than doubled since 1950 and "we have more food, more clothes, more cars, bigger houses, more central heating, more foreign holidays, a shorter working week, nicer work and, above all, better health." Once average annual income is above $20,000 a head, higher pay brings no greater happiness. Why? One, our genes account for roughly half of our predisposition to be happy or unhappy, and two, our wants are relative to what other people have, not to some absolute measure.

Happiness is better equated with satisfaction than pleasure, says Emory University psychiatrist Gregory Berns in Satisfaction (Henry Holt, 2005), because the pursuit of pleasure lands us on a never-ending hedonic treadmill that paradoxically leads to misery. "Satisfaction is an emotion that captures the uniquely human need to impart meaning to one's activities," Berns concludes. "While you might find pleasure by happenstance--winning the lottery, possessing the genes for a sunny temperament, or having the luck not to live in poverty--satisfaction can arise only by the conscious decision to do something. And this makes all the difference in the world, because it is only your own actions for which you may take responsibility and credit."

.......... SNIP"

http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=C73C7109-E7F2-99DF-31EB094AF750C3C3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dems are more worried about the future. And I guess the first paragraph
helps explain how some people (ones who enjoy huge tax cuts) could still like *. That must be his 30% base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That and those who don't understand luck vs action. They don't consider luck as a factor
in their success, they believe that it was their actions that lead to their success. When presented with the fact that others did everything exactly the same as they did and failed, they claim those people didn't try hard enough or some internal failure that made them fail. For some it's beyond their ability to admit luck plays a factor in ones life. It's the same when they run into a person thats happy with their lot in life, they believe that obtaining more and being paid more leads one on the road to happiness, so one can not be truely happy unless they are chasing the having more game, so these poor people are unable to be happy because they are not gaining material wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then there are the democrats who believe that working for the betterment
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 03:23 PM by applegrove
of all but especially those who are vulnerable is the only way to be happy. They do see "luck - no luck" in why some families are poor or some people get sick and need health care. We were happy under Clinton for the most part because the lot of many was improved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think people are happiest when they feel small - like in their childhood.
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 05:59 PM by applegrove
Or connected to the world through good works and in other ways. When you feel little..you don't expect everything to always turn out for you..but are happy and content with working towards goals ahead. And happy to work for goals for those around you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC