Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: Bush diverted U.S. to Iraq, allowing Al Qaeda to get "back in business"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:03 AM
Original message
NYT editorial: Bush diverted U.S. to Iraq, allowing Al Qaeda to get "back in business"
Editorial
Al Qaeda Resurgent
Published: February 25, 2007

Almost five and a half years ago, America — united by the shock of 9/11 — understood exactly what it needed to do. It had to find, thwart and take down the command structure of Al Qaeda, which was responsible for the deaths of 3,000 innocent people on American soil. Despite years of costly warfare in Afghanistan and Iraq, America today is not significantly closer to that essential goal.

At a crucial moment, the Bush administration diverted America’s military strength, political attention and foreign aid dollars from a necessary, winnable war in Afghanistan to an unnecessary, and by now unwinnable, war in Iraq. Al Qaeda took full advantage of these blunders to survive and rebuild. Now it seems to be back in business.

As our colleagues Mark Mazzetti and David Rohde reported last week, American intelligence and counterterrorism officials believe that Al Qaeda has rebuilt its notorious training camps, this time in Pakistan’s loosely governed tribal regions near the Afghan border. Camp graduates are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq — and may well be plotting new terrorist strikes in the West.

The same officials point to more frequent and more current videos as evidence that Al Qaeda’s top leaders, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri — once on the run for their lives and unable to maintain timely communications with their followers — now feel more secure. Al Qaeda is not as strong as it was when its Taliban allies ruled Afghanistan. But, the officials warn, it is getting there....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/25/opinion/25sun1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. thanks, MSM, for your part in this tragic diversion (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah? What? Er, excuse me?
I thought Iraq was the diversion from going after Al Qaeda all this time, now you're telling me Al Qaeda is itself a diversion of no importance? Ah, do I have this right?

Not like it has anything to do with Iran granted but, this is not computing, except in a contrarian sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think grasswire means the diversion to Iraq
(is what the MSM helped support).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ah ok!
Came off weird to me in that context. I stand corrected and clarified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. This was OBVIOUS years ago.
The fact that the neocons left the Taliban and al-Qaeda til last in the campaign and let Bin Laden skip over the border to our "ally" Pakistan then left Karzai in the lurch with a fraction of the troops and funds promised was a bit of a giveaway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. By design....
BushCo and Al-Qaeda need each other like peanut butter needs jelly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC