Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Imus Affair is About Apartheid in Media (Brent Budowsky)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:55 AM
Original message
The Imus Affair is About Apartheid in Media (Brent Budowsky)
http://pundits.thehill.com/2007/04/11/the-imus-affair-is-about-apartheid-in-media/

The Imus Affair is About Apartheid in Media (Brent Budowsky)

snip//



There is, far too often, a race-based apartheid, and a gender-based apartheid, that plagues both our mainstream media and our corporate conglomerates, at the ownership, management and host levels.

Even Air America — which I have urged repeatedly to build major alliances with African-American and Hispanic hosts, networks and audiences — is far too much white bread for my taste, which is significantly accountable for its troubles.

It’s not enough, if Air America wants to speak for progressives, to have one or two black or Hispanic hosts, or management and ownership that is so heavily dominated by white males to the exclusion of blacks, Hispanics and women in positions of true power.

I single out Air America because it seeks to stand for progressivism and could do better, should do better, and will never succeed until it actually does better.

There is a political apartheid, too, even among Democrats. Why has such little support been given to voter registration, get-out-the-vote drives, and policing honest elections in African-American and Hispanic precincts? The reason is the Democratic consultariat class makes its money not from registering or protecting the franchise of minority voters, but in its piece of the action for giant television ad buys.

There is apartheid on war and peace. One can watch the reruns from 2002, 2003, and 2004, reread the newspapers, or review the insider guests on cable television shows. What got America into the Iraq war without serious debate was not only misrepresentation by the administration, on matters that were well known to insiders but never stated publicly; it was an insider apartheid.


more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very important point. It is about racism on the airwaves,
not about the story of one man, but if we mean it that we want to challenge white privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Definition: Colorblind - If it affects only people of color, we are blind to it!
I remember reading the Black Commentator after the theft of the 2004 election - one article said it perfectly: White progressive only care about the Black Vote if the candidate the white's like lost because Black voters were treated unfairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's still a white man's world in most media
And minorities are shuffled off to "special programming", usually on Sunday afternoons or 3:00 in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Boy, he HE nailed it. Excellent insights. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC