Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There are No Republicans in Science Fiction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:34 AM
Original message
There are No Republicans in Science Fiction

There are No Republicans in Science Fiction
By David Glenn Cox



Only in America can you win the Nobel Peace Prize and then be condemned in the media. Rather than taking pride that an American won a prestigious award right wing pundits have reignited the whole there’s no global warming shtick. You would thing that they would begin to tire of being wrong, but no. When you never have to admit your wrong it becomes easier to be wrong even when the non-perfected disagree

The party that voted against Social Security, Civil rights, seat belts and air bags is running the cigarette smoking campaign redux with global warming. For years they contended there was no definitive proof that cigarettes caused cancer. Study after study proved the connection and Republicans with their tobacco lobby allies would claim the study defective or the scientist’s partisan. Then the tobacco lobby would produce their own study disputing the original facts.

I have always been a fan of science fiction films of the 1950’s and 1960’s it’s fun to look back and see how they envisioned our future. With picture telephones the size of car spare tires and robots with spinning antenna on top of their heads. But usually the crux of their movie plot involved some dire crises facing planet Earth. In the Japanese classic Godzilla the monster rose out of the sea because of mankind’s careless use of nuclear power.

No one thought to dispute the issue of the monsters intent, so as I’ve said there are no Republicans in science fiction. Were it real, Republican legislators would have stood in the well Congress, “Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak in support of our friends in Japan. Their Capital City in ruins because of this horrible monster from the deep, but Mr. Speaker let us not be too quick to assume that the monsters motivation was nuclear energy. This monster also attacked bridges and commuter trains so it is just as plausible that the monster was opposing public transportation.

Mr. Speaker I stand today to defend America from horrible sea monsters and encourage my fellow members to vote against the mass transit appropriation bill, to which I would like to add an amendment that I call the Godzilla protection act.

In the classic film “The Day The Earth Stood Still” an Alien space craft lands in Washington D.C. The alien has been sent on a mission to convince mankind to pursue the paths of peace. In a speech before the United Nations the visitor asserts that if mankind will only renounce war that assistance will be granted to our planet. But if we continue in our warlike ways then the Earth will be destroyed.

Bush and Cheney would have had a bill before Congress quadrupling the military defense budget as soon as the nuclear cloud had dissipated from where the alien spacecraft had landed. “And our Fox News poll tonight, Should the world’s leaders be dictated to by horrible alien space mutants and their nine foot tall robots?”

It just doesn’t matter; every American who has ever won the Nobel Peace Prize is attacked. Jimmy Carter was attacked Martin Luther King was attacked until the day he died. Maybe it’s because Republicans don’t win the Nobel Peace Prize or maybe it’s because they don’t deserve to. But I ask you, if Al Gore shouldn’t have won the prize who should have?

The pundits contend it was political as if the Nobel Committee stays up late at night in Sweden thinking of ways to sabotage the Republicans. It goes to show their self obsessed myopic view of the world. While living in Montgomery we had some visitors from Switzerland and the only thing they wanted to see was Martin Luther Kings church. We pulled on the door but it was locked, a caretaker came out from a side door and explained that the church was closed. We explained that they were from Switzerland and that they really wanted to see the church and he quickly guided us in.

Our guest stood before the pulpit and was visibly moved he hadn’t ever heard the pundit’s calling King a communist and a subversive. He had only heard King’s words unfiltered and I realized that even with all the admiration that King received we as Americans still took him for granted and didn’t realize the impact he had on the world. But it was a slow year for peace; Al Gore made a film about global warming and brought the issue to the forefront. Martin Luther King led millions through non-violent peaceful action to change the world. But it was a slow year for peace, who would you have picked?

Chairman Hu in China? Bush? Not hardly, Tony Blair? Ohlmert? Merkle? You see it really has been a slow year for peace. Perhaps the Buddhist monks in Myanmar will be eligible next year provided any of them are still left alive. But the candidates for this year have been slim pickins, I think Mr. Gore was the best choice available. I think his work is laudable and commendable but I fear for our future when the best we can do is to raise awareness.

Green house gas emissions have risen 25% since the Kyoto treaty was signed. The leaders of the countries most responsible have argued it should be left to the individual countries. Or it is an internal matter and we are doing the best we can all while making huge profits. Calling all Aliens! If you’re out their fellas the time to land is now. Like King we don’t see Al Gore as the Nobel committee sees him.

We see him through the chaff of political punditry the same people who assured us civil rights were best left to the states. That automobiles didn’t need seatbelts or airbags or café standards and that cigarette smoking was actually good for us. That peace is weakness and war is strength. Reflecting badly on us all the dirth of candidates promoting peace and the attacking of those who only dare to point out our problems.

Were this science fiction it might be funny but it’s not fiction it’s fact. Were the aliens to land in Washington I doubt the promise to make a film to raise awareness would suffice with the visitors. I’m glad Al Gore won the Nobel Prize I only wish that someone would had deserved it more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can think of one example off the top of my head
Dr. Edward Morbius in Forbidden Planet.

He's the keeper of forbidden knowledge that is so powerful that it can only be used for good or evil (apologies to the Firesign Theatre). He believes only he is competent to control that power, but fails to understand that his own internal conflicts and primitive desires are channeling the energy in a destructive way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't get me started on The Firesign
"You get the guards attention by urinating out the cell door window"
"I didn't breastfeed you for 14 years for this!"
"That's Bob's Bizerko Lounge located by the statue of the square round poet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Palpatine in "Star Wars"? Darth Vader, Jabba the Hut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Gul' Dukat from DS9.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bradbury is an R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's unfortunate - he's one of my favorite writers
He's a fantastic writer, but his politics suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Heinlein Had Some Libertarian, if not GOP Leanings, Too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Bradbury is just a senile old man
How is it possible that a man who wrote something as farsighted and brilliant as that could go over to the very ones he wrote about in Farenheit 451, the Beatty's and such.

Maybe he had his own "David Brock" moment and never came back. We all know how the Bushie False Reality Bubble is seductive and soothing because it eliminates the need of it's partakers to think for themselves.

And if there is one thing we Imperial Subjects of Amerika find boringly tedious, it's thinking about heavy stuff. Maybe Bradbury succumbed. It could happen to anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. He was just as crazy when I met him ten years ago.
Can't explain it, but some people equate social progress with a kind of totalitarianism. He also thinks that the Berlin Wall fell just because Reagan told the Soviets to do it. He thinks "Star Wars" made them do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Wow, astonishing. How could a man like that write Farenheit 451?
And then basically embrace everything the villains in Farenheit 451 stood for.

I say again: human beings are amazing ceatures capable of everythign. Shame aboutthe pending dark Ahes and extiction, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. bradbury was pissed that michael moore
used the title fahrenheit 9/11. he objected just before the movie's release even though the title had been made public for nearly a year before that
his objection was based on his claim that fahrenheit 451 was not a political book
has he ever read it? - of course it was political
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is
this asshole.

Thanks for posting the speech, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I took a science fiction writing course in college. My professor HATED Orson Scott Card...
with the heat of a thousand supernovas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Enders game is among the top 10 SF books of all time.
Thus sayeth Jeff the axe-wielder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Agreed, Ender's Game is a great book
But that doesn't mean OSC isn't also an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I actually liked his original short story better ... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Michael Crichton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Tom Clancy (who is sort of sci-fi) is an Alan Keyes Republicker.
Edited on Wed Oct-17-07 10:01 AM by IanDB1
But that's not really the point of the essay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Clancy doesn't write science fiction
He writes adventure stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomfodw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. You're right. He writes fantasy.
Actually, Tom Clancy writes Mary Sue wish-fulfillment fantasies. Jack Ryan is the purest Mary Sue I have ever encountered in a lifetime of reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. There's one republican science writer who is a bush ass kisser
Michael Criteon, he doesn't believe in global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I never log in from work as a policy...

...but when I read it during lunch I was severely tempted to in order to :kick: this. You wrote it?

This is a moving essay. You shouldn't let it just languish here in high-churn land... post it around a bit. I think it would go over well on dkos. I'd be glad to proxy post it there if you don't have an account.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adnelson60087 Donating Member (661 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. In the Star Trek Universe
whatever becomes of the Conservative movement? In DS9 and other shows, there is very little mention of God, Allah, taxes, guns and insurance companies. I wonder if they finally went extinct, or there is a separatist movement of them living somewhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Most sfi fi is idealized
as far as understanding that the people who go INTO space, are NOT going to be the religious nut bags. What we send into space needs to be the BEST of mankind, and that does not include religious nutters...

However I think that DS9 took a GREAT view on religion and there was even one episode where it was discussed among the 'non humans' on the command deck. They discussed what a pity it is that the humans don't have any gods they pray to.

I would also point out that religion IS talked about extensively in many Sci-Fi stories, etc, B5 was WONDERFUL about dealing with alien religions. Star Wars has the Force!

In Battlestar Galactica their entire religion was that of the ancient Greeks!

But the reason that MAJOR characters in Sci Fi are not religious, is because there comes a point in rationality, where that kind of thinking is Sunday school, it's not for the big bad, real world, especially when you are dealing with hard numbers and physics.

you can NOT be a righty AND an explorer, the two are mutually exclusive. Name one R E A L scientist who is a right wing nut job. Its possible you can name one, but in general, (and by you I mean anybody) the two just can NOT go together, because science REQUIRES flexibility of mind and righties just aren't that way - ESPECIALLY the current breed of gopers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
23. A lot of Repub's and Libertarians WRITE SF, though.
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 10:27 AM by tomreedtoon
You ever sit and listen to Jerry Pournelle? I once heard him bitching about the fact that he couldn't eat peanuts on an airplane, and had to eat pretzels instead. He sluffed off all arguments that peanut allergies could kill other people on the airplane. He didn't give a damn; he wanted his goddamned peanuts! The best example of Libertarian philosophy I've ever heard.

Also, don't forget that the first mainstream magazine to review science fiction seriously was National Review.

There are some remarkably liberal SF writers - one of my personal favorites is Peter David. But there's a lot of SF writers who glory in military conquest, killing the evil enemy, basking in the glow reflected from super-weapon planes and spaceships, and enough weapon fetishry to make the NRA seem tame. Look at the covers of science fiction books (if you can find them among all the vampire and monster novels that are currently dominating the field) and you'll see uniforms, shining spacecraft, and warfare fetishism. David Drake is more fascistic than Soldier of Fortune Magazine.

And thanks to the bad example of the irascible but loveable Harlan Ellison, telling a disagreeing questioner "F*** you" is considered polite discourse in the world of science fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. good post, but...
gore didn't just make a movie - he has been working on this for decades - finally people are waking up to it - but he promoted it for years when it was an extremely unpopular view
you say he made a movie
it's actually his life's work

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0Nnph3zkHNw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. the Ferengi on Star Trek?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. What about this Philip K. Dick book?
Vulcan's Hammer by Philip K. Dick

Book Description


Objective, unbiased and hyperrational, the Vulcan 3 should have been the perfect ruler. The omnipotent computer dictates policy that is in the best interests of all citizens—or at least, that is the idea. But when the machine, whose rule evolved out of chaos and war, begins to lose control of the “Healer” movement of religious fanatics and the mysterious force behind their rebellion, all hell breaks loose.

Written in 1960, Philip K. Dick’s paranoid novel imagines a totalitarian state in which hammer-headed robots terrorize citizens and freedom is an absurd joke. William Barrios, the morally conflicted hero, may be the only person who can prevent the battle for control from destroying the world—if, that is, he can decide which side he’s on.

http://www.amazon.com/Vulcans-Hammer-Philip-K-Dick/dp/1400030129


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. What about
1984? Fahrenheit 451? Isaac Asimov's The Gods Themselves? And don't forget Babylon 5. I watch those shows and I am absolutely spooked by how similar the situation on Earth was to our current one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. This column is nothing but a back handed slap to Al Gore in it self.
"But the candidates for this year have been slim pickins, I think Mr. Gore was the best choice available."

So Al Gore is the best of slim pickins, I believe Al Gore is the best choice in decades. Even the monks whom I highly support are working to bring peace to one nation, global warming threatens humanity as a whole, with the potential of causing wars everywhere. Some believe it's already contributed to war in Sudan.

Slim Pickens rode on the back of a nuclear bomb in Dr. Strangelove, or how I learned to love the bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC