|
Change has become a big talking point in the Democratic campaigns, as it rightly should.
I work in HIV and Hep C prevention programs. We view change as part of a broader objective. The role of Public Health is to improve the well being of the community as a whole. While we mainly work with individuals, our first client is really the community, so our focus is on change in a bigger social context.
Truth be told, our job is to encourage individuals to help meet a big picture goal. Keeping that in mind, here’s my take on change and how it may relate to a similar political process.
Change is incremental. For most people, it’s two steps forward, one step back. Repeat as necessary. Some have that “Aha! moment”, but generally it’s a process:
1st unconsidered; 2nd considered; 3rd possible; 4th probable; 5th accomplished; 6th maintained.
Change isn’t always linear or permanent. Individuals, and communities, sometimes cycle through the process.
Change is rooted in social networks first. Professional, political and legal systems follow.
Change isn’t always easy. It involves realistic compromises between the end goals and the ways to get there.
Take infections from sharing injection equipment, for instance.
While the *ideal* may be that all injectors stop using, Public Health realizes that some people may not want to quit, some may not be able to today, right now, yet some can and will.
Keeping in mind the big picture goal of limiting blood borne infections, though, we know that many along that spectrum will be willing to use safe shooting practices. Thus, we support needle exchange programs.
Say we meet with 100 folks. 30 will likely walk away. 20 may “think about it”. And 50 of them will make some kind of change. We accept that, no strings attached.
And the success is that those 50 – 70 people lay the groundwork for change in the broader community. Each in their own way, each to the point they can accomplish.
Do those numbers sound familiar?
Put it in political terms. Out of 100 people, we may never motivate those hard core 30 right wingers to see our point of view. There may be another 20 on the fence. Yet 50 will respond to our agenda and help lay the foundation for change. Each in their own way, each to the point they can accomplish.
I think the process has been reflected in most of the major political changes we’ve seen in America over the years.
From our original founding as a country, through the abolishment of slavery, legalization of womens’ suffrage to the codification of civil rights – all were once unthinkable, then considered. They became possible, eventually probable and were finally accomplished.
Change is the twinkle in the eye of history.
When our grandchildren look back and wonder – “what the hell was the big deal about?” – we’ll all be able to grin and know we have done them, and history, well. :thumbsup:
pinto
|