|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:01 AM Original message |
Vanity Fair: Time to face an inconvenient truth: Bill Clinton is running for a third term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
1. I knew it. I knew it. Think he figured that out a long time ago and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. "De Facto end-run around the 22nd amendment"--yep. So, so tired of these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
3. Wretched, freeperish garbage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Spot-on true. Hits a nerve, perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Yes, it hits a nerve when a poster to an allegedly Democratic site posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Wretched may be in the eye of the beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yes, Vanity Fair is full of freeper writers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Does the name Christopher Hitchens ring a bell? He's their ace writer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Oooh, you got me. One for you! My head is sagging in shame. He's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. hitchens is a drunk, who usually takes positions of the extreme left wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
38. hitchens, the "drink-sotted popinjay"--does occasionally write for Vanity Fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Its an opinion that resulted from the actions of Bill Clinton himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. You have an Edwards photo up and you make this comment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Edwards would smash Clinton one on one. YOU wise up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Time to wake up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. They've done a pretty fine job of keeping him irrelevant. John is a good candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
7. A very succint and correct analysis of the sad situation the dem party finds itself in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Very thoughful post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
9. "We'll never know who's calling the shots" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
13. These two sentences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
16. Obama dissed Bill Clinton unfairly and unnecessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Boy, you bought it all hook line and sinker didnt you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I read the whole interview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. "but it's a contest over Bill Clinton's record." Don't you see how pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MBS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
19. thanks for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. The Reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
24. Seems HRC has always wanted the title First Woman President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Scare Tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Speaking of Montana, it is not talking heads I hear hatred of all things Clinton from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Agree, that Bill's emotional response is hurting Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Yep, Obama's veiled attack on the Clintons by dis-ing the Boomers was BIG mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
31. I would think the people who would be most upset at a 3rd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:11 AM Response to Reply #31 |
37. why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. "We are not Argentina...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
33. WOW! Great article! And Bill doesn't support gay marriages either!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Great article! And I thought Clintons supported "don't ask, don't tell" for gay marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. No, they didn't support marriages between gays at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
36. Good. I'd gladly vote for Bill Clinton again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC